[Call to Order] [00:00:11] CITY OF COACHELLA CITY COUNCIL CONVENES FOR ITS REGULAR AND CLOSED SESSION MEETING. THE TIME IS 5:01 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS MAY BE RECEIVED EITHER IN PERSON, VIA EMAIL OR VIA ZOOM. IN PERSON, THEY CAN ACQUIRE SPEAKER FORM IN THE BACK AND ON ZOOM. THEY CAN RAISE THEIR HAND WHEN CALLED UPON TO DO. SPEAKING ON THE ZOOM AND VIA WRITING SHOULD HAVE BEEN RECEIVED NO LATER THAN 12 P.M. FOR IT TO BE GIVEN. THOSE. A PUBLIC RECORD THAT ARE EMAILED COMMENTS WILL BE PUT INTO THE RECORD AS WELL, AND THEY WILL BE NOTATED IN THE APPROPRIATE TIME LATER ON THIS EVENING. CAN WE DO A ROLL CALL, PLEASE? COUNCIL MEMBER PEREZ HERE. COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ HERE. MAYOR FIGUEROA PRESENT FOR THE RECORD, COUNCILMEMBER DELGADO AND COUNCILMEMBER VIVIAN ARE NOT PRESENT AT THIS TIME. BOTH HAVE IDENTIFIED NOT BEING HERE. SO EXCUSED ABSENCE ON BOTH, SIR. THEY BOTH IDENTIFIED. THEY WANT TO BE HERE, CORRECT? YES. OKAY. SO CAN I DO A MOTION ON SIR? I SHOULD SAY COUNCIL MEMBER VIVIAN IDENTIFIED. SHE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO BE HERE. OKAY. CAN YOU DO A MOTION TO DO AN EXCUSED ABSENCE FOR COUNCIL MEMBER BEATON? A MOTION, A MOTION, A MOTION. SO YOU CAN DO A SECOND IF YOU WANT. SECOND. OKAY. DO A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE AYE. THANK YOU. [Approval of Agenda] WITH THAT, FOR THE RECORD, NEXT WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. AT THIS TIME, THE COUNCIL BOARD CORPORATION AUTHORITY MAY ANNOUNCE ANY ITEMS BEING PULLED FROM THE AGENDA OR CONTINUE TO ANOTHER DATE OR REQUEST THE MOVING OF AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA. AT THIS TIME, I DID RECEIVE A NOTICE FROM CITY STAFF. THEY WILL. WE WILL. WE WILL BE CONTINUING ITEM NUMBER 25 UNTIL SEVEN EIGHT, AND THEN ITEM NUMBER 26 WILL BE MOVED TO A FUTURE AGENDA AS STAFF REQUIRES A BIT MORE TIME ON THAT ITEM BEFORE PRESENTING. WITH THAT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I HAVE A REQUEST. YES. CAN WE GO AHEAD AND PULL ITEM NUMBER 23 AND BRING IT BACK TO DISCUSSION? AS A NEW BUSINESS? I JUST HAVE A COUPLE OF CONCERNS AND QUESTIONS ON IT. OKAY. DO YOU WANT ME TO COME BACK OR DO YOU WANT TO JUST DISCUSS IT AT THAT TIME? YEAH, BRING IT BACK AT THE BUSINESS, THE NEW BUSINESS. SO WHAT YOU CAN DO IS SO ANYTHING ON CONSENT. SO WHEN WE GET TO CONSENT I'LL TALK ABOUT THE CONSENT AND YOU CAN WE CAN PULL ITEMS IN AND WE'LL HAVE IT OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. SO WE'LL NOTE THAT. SO FOR THE RECORD WHEN SOMEONE DOES A CONSENT PEOPLE COUNCIL MEMBERS CAN PULL ANY ITEM AT THAT TIME. SO AT THAT TIME FOR THE RECORD, WE'LL NOTE WE'LL BE PULLING AN ITEM FOR COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ WITHOUT ANY OTHER THING. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED WITH THE TWO MODIFICATIONS. I'LL GO AHEAD. SECOND, A MOTION. AND SECOND, OKAY, WITH THAT ROLL CALL. ROLL CALL PLEASE. COUNCILMEMBER BETTY'S. YES. COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ I MAYOR FIGUEROA I OKAY WITH THAT? GO AHEAD, SIR, I JUST RECEIVED NOTICE FROM COUNCILMEMBER DELGADO. SHE'S RUNNING A TEN MINUTES BEHIND. OKAY. SO SHE WILL BE HERE. OKAY. SOUNDS GOOD. SO SHE'LL BE HERE IN ABOUT TEN MINUTES. OKAY WITH THAT. ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR CLOSED SESSION ITEMS? NONE FOR CLOSED SESSION. NONE IN-PERSON. NONE ONLINE. WITH THAT, THE COUNCIL [Adjourn to Closed Session] WILL CONVENE TO CLOSED S [Reconvene Regular Meeting] COUNCID FROM CLOSED SESSION. WE WERE NOT WATCHING THE MEXICO GAME IN THE BACK. WE PROMISED. IT REALLY STARTED. EL JUEGO. SO. SO WITH THAT, WE RECONVENE. MR. [Closed Session Announcements] CITY ATTORNEY, ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS FROM CLOSED SESSION? YES. THANK YOU. MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. THE CITY COUNCIL MET IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA, AND THERE IS NO REPORTABLE ACTION. THANK YOU. WITH THAT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. IF WE CAN HAVE OUR NEW CITY MANAGER LEADS US IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PLEASE. RAISE YOUR HAND OVER YOUR HEART. READY? BEGIN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. SO WITH THAT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE'LL MOVE ON TO CITY COUNCIL. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE. ANY COUNCIL MEMBER HAVE ANY ITEMS ON THE AGENDA THAT THEY WILL HAVE TO RECUSE THEMSELVES FROM? THIS IS THE TIME FOR THAT TO STATE THAT, FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NONE, WE'LL MOVE ON TO. [Oath of Office] I ACTUALLY DID SKIP SOMETHING. WE HAVE THE OATH OF OFFICE FOR NUMBER FIVE, ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE TO THE NEWLY APPOINTED CITY MANAGER, KELLY. IF IT'S OKAY WITH YOU, I'D LIKE [00:05:01] TO HAVE MY WIFE AND DAUGHTER UP HERE WITH ME, OF COURSE. AND, LIKE, ALSO PLACE MY HAND OVER THE BIBLE. SO THIS IS AN INTRODUCTION. THIS IS MY DAUGHTER AND MY WIFE, ELIZABETH ROMO. AND YOU CAN BRING THE BIBLE. OKAY? OKAY. AND YOU'RE GONNA SAY YOUR NAME. I, I, GUSTAVO ROMO, DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR. DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT I WILL SUPPORT, THAT I WILL SUPPORT AND DEFEND AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC. THAT I WILL BEAR, WILL BEAR, THAT I WILL BEAR TRUE FAITH, TRUE FAITH AND ALLEGIANCE AND ALLEGIANCE TO THE CONSTITUTION, TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THAT I TAKE THIS OBLIGATION FREELY, THAT I TAKE THIS OBLIGATION FREELY, WITHOUT ANY MENTAL RESERVATION, WITHOUT ANY MENTAL RESERVATION OR PURPOSE OF EVASION OR PURPOSE OF EVASION. AND THAT I WILL. WELL, AND THAT I WILL WELL AND FAITHFULLY DISCHARGE, FAITHFULLY DISCHARGE THE DUTIES, THE DUTIES UPON WHICH I AM ABOUT TO ENTER, UPON WHICH I AM ABOUT TO ENTER. OKAY. THANK YOU. FINISH THAT. FINISH THAT OFF. THANK YOU. MR. MR. ROMO, AND WELCOME TO THE CITY OF COACHELLA, AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU AS OUR NEXT CITY MANAGER. THANK YOU. MAYOR. IS THAT CURRENT? YEAH, AS OUR CURRENT CITY MANAGER AS OF LAST WEEK. AND THIS IS YOUR OFFICIAL SWEARING IN. SO THANK YOU AND THANK YOU WITH THAT. AND THEN SO WE DID A CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS, UNLESS YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS THAT YOU WANT TO MAKE MR. ROMO RIGHT NOW OR YOU WANT TO WAIT TILL YOUR END, YOU KNOW, I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY. I LOOK FORWARD TO SERVING THE RESIDENTS AND BUSINESS OWNERS OF THE CITY OF COACHELLA. THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME. THANK YOU. WITH THAT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO. THERE WAS NONE FOR CITY COUNCIL [Public Comments (Non-Agenda Items) (Limited to a maximum of 30 minutes. If additional time is required for public comments, they will be heard after Public Hearing Calendar)] CONFLICT INTEREST DISCLOSURES AT THIS TIME. WE'LL HAVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 30 MINUTES. AN ADDITIONAL TIME IS REQUIRED. PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE HEARD AFTER PUBLIC HEARING CALENDAR. THE PUBLIC MAY ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL BOARD, CORPORATION AUTHORITY OF ANY ON ANY ITEM OF INTEREST TO THE PUBLIC. THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA BUT IS IN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION THEREOF. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE MINUTES. OKAY. WE HAVE ALAN CARVALHO. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, CONGRATULATIONS. THE SON OF JESUS GONZALEZ, WHO WAS ATTEMPTED TO RECALL TWO FEMALE COUNCIL MEMBERS IN COACHELLA, WAS JUST DEFEATED. HIS ATTEMPT TO GAIN RECOGNITION AS A VIABLE CANDIDATE BY DEMONIZING TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO STOOD UP TO FORMER FELONY MAYOR STEVE HERNANDEZ, MAYOR OF COACHELLA, WAS REJECTED WHEN TWO POWERFUL WOMEN, YADIRA AND DENISE, ARE BEING REJECTED BY CORRUPT MEMBERS OF OUR COMMUNITY. YOU KNOW THAT THOSE TWO WOMEN ARE A THREAT TO THEIR CONSISTENT ATTEMPTS TO HIJACK AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY OF HARDWORKING MEN AND WOMEN. HERE IN COACHELLA, OUR CHILDREN ARE AT RISK. HEALTH RISKS FROM DATA CENTERS INSPIRED AND PROMOTED BY OUR FORMER MAYOR, A PROVEN FELON, AND AN EMBARRASSMENT TO OUR CITY, OUR ENTIRE VALLEY TO CONTINUE CLEANING HOUSE. IT'S THE DUTY OF EACH MEMBER OF THIS COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR TO FIND A MORE QUALIFIED CITY ATTORNEY WHO HAS NOT BEEN INFLUENCED BY SPECIAL INTERESTS. THE HIJACKING OF POWER BY THE EAST VALLEY CABAL HAS BEEN DEFEATED ONCE AGAIN. YOU HAVE DONE AN AMAZING JOB. THIS AREA HAS BEEN FILLED WITH THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED AN OUTRAGE OVER DATA CENTERS. THE MISGUIDANCE OF A COUNCIL THAT WAS NOT PROPERLY VETTING THE ISSUE THAT A GOOD CITY ATTORNEY WOULD HAVE DONE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT IN HERE TO SCRUTINIZE THE PAPERS THAT YOU WERE SO UNFORTUNATELY COERCED INTO BELIEVING IT WAS A GOOD THING FOR THE CITY. BUT YOU HAVE NOW THE DUTY AND THE GRACE AND THE PRIVILEGE TO REPRESENT A COMMUNITY THAT IS LOOKING SO FORWARD TO TRUE LEADERSHIP. THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE DOING, AND WE'RE VERY PROUD OF YOU. PROUD OF WHAT? WHAT YOU STAND FOR, THE COMMUNITY THAT HAS BEEN SO MISGUIDED FOR SO MANY YEARS. I MEAN, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT MR. JESUS GONZALEZ, WHOSE FATHER WAS A COUNCIL MEMBER AND A MAYOR, I MEAN, HE WAS HE SCANDALIZED THE CITY AND HIS SON HAS THE NERVE TO COME HERE AND TRY AND ATTEMPT TO UNSEAT TWO WOMEN WHO ARE REPRESENTING THIS CITY BETTER THAN ANYBODY THAT HE'S EVER BEEN, HAS EVER KNOWN OR EXPERIENCED. AND YET HE SOMEHOW THINKS THAT WE'RE NOT AWARE OF HIS PAST AND HIS FATHER'S PAST. I MEAN, IT'S SHOCKING, BUT WE ARE SEEING THINGS IN DAYLIGHT. [00:10:06] WE THEY DON'T HAVE TO HIDE. THEY DON'T HIDE. THEY'RE DOING ALL OF THIS LEVEL OF CORRUPTION OUT IN THE OPEN. BUT WE'VE GOT THEM. IT'S TIME FOR THE CITY TO MOVE FORWARD PROUDLY AND IN AN EXCITING WAY. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. I GUESS THE ONLY OTHER THING I WANTED TO SAY IS HOW COME STEPHANIE WASN'T ON THAT LIST OF PEOPLE THAT SHOULD BE RECALLED? HOW COME SHE AND HER ASSOCIATION WITH THE FORMER MAYOR DIDN'T SORT OF COME UP? THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, MR. CARVALHO. NEXT SPEAKER. YES. JAMES RODRIGUEZ, JAMES RODRIGUEZ. GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, AND WELCOME TO OUR NEW CITY MANAGER AGAIN, JAMES RODRIGUEZ, COACHELLA RESIDENT. JUST NOW, I'VE SUBMITTED TO THE CLERK A REQUEST FOR COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION. THIS IS REGARDING THE RESIDENT ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNITY HERITAGE UPLIFTING POTLUCK THAT I WAS ABLE TO DESCRIBE TO YOU AT OUR LAST CITY COUNCIL MEETING. YOU KNOW, IT WASN'T ON THE RECORD, BUT THIS IS AN OFFICIAL ON THE RECORD ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE ENGAGEMENT. WE DID HAVE OUR INCEPTION EVENT. IT WAS JUNE 13TH. IT WAS ON FRIDAY. WE WERE ABLE TO HAVE SOME COUNCIL MEMBERS COME. AND WE VERY MUCH APPRECIATED THE SUPPORT AND THE ENGAGEMENT THAT THEY PROVIDED. WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THE CITY TO TRY TO GET A FACILITY SO THAT WE CAN HAVE THAT EVENT IN THE AIR CONDITIONING DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS. WE ARE TRYING TO GET IT FOR JULY, BUT UNFORTUNATELY, BECAUSE OF THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE CITY MANAGER THAT WE HAVE ABOUT 45 DAYS FOR REQUESTS LIKE THIS, WE ARE REQUESTING THIS FOR THE FIRST MONTH STARTING AUGUST, THAT IT WOULD BE PART OF THE REQUEST, AND THE REQUEST GOES AS FOLLOWS. I RESPECTFULLY SUBMIT THIS REQUEST FOR THE AGENDA AT THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON JULY 8TH. THAT'S A TYPO THERE. SEEKING A WAIVER OF FACILITY RENTAL FEES AND SECURITY CLEANUP DEPOSITS FOR THE REACH UP MONTHLY GATHERINGS. THAT, AGAIN, IS THE RESIDENT ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNITY HERITAGE UPLIFTING POTLUCK. THE APPLICANT MYSELF HOPES THAT THE STAFF AGREES THAT THE REOCCURRING EVENTS SCHEDULED FOR THE SECOND FRIDAY OF AUGUST, SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER FROM 630 TO 10 P.M. AT THE COACHELLA LIBRARY THIRD ROOM CONSTITUTE A MERITORIOUS PUBLIC BENEFIT. THE BACKGROUND OF THE EVENT, REACH UP, IS A RESIDENT LED EFFORT ESTABLISHED TO BRIDGE THE GAP BETWEEN COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION OF COACHELLA'S HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORANEOUS RECORD. FOLLOWING THE SUCCESSFUL SESSION HELD IN JUNE AND THE UPCOMING JULY EVENT, THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO MAINTAIN THIS VENUE TO ENSURE RESIDENTS HAVE CONSISTENT, ACCESSIBLE SPACE FOR DIALOG REGARDING LOCAL GOVERNANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE. THERE IS MORE INFORMATION ON THIS AS IT IS SUBMITTED, BUT WHAT THE REQUEST IS IS THAT IT'S A A FEE WAIVER FOR THE FACILITY USE OR PERMIT AND THE DEPOSIT. THERE ARE SOME ALTERNATIVES THAT ARE PRESENTED TO YOU. THIS IS WRITTEN PRETTY MUCH LIKE A STAFF REPORT, AND THAT IS SO THAT THE STAFF HAS AN EASIER TIME ASSESSING THE RAMIFICATIONS OF APPROVING AN EVENT LIKE THIS. AGAIN, IT IS RESIDENT LED. IT'S ALL MEANT TO BE COMMUNITY BASED. THERE IS NO, YOU KNOW, LLC OR NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION AS OF YET. WE'RE STILL TRYING TO AGAIN, THIS IS THIS WOULD BE THE SECOND EVENT IN JULY. THE THIRD EVENT WOULD BE THE FIRST ONE THAT, IF APPROVED, THE CITY WOULD WAIVE THE FEES FOR AND ESSENTIALLY BECOME A SPONSOR OF THE EVENT. THERE IS SOME INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THAT ALIGNS WITH THE CITY'S ALREADY DESCRIBED DIRECTIONS, SO THANK YOU. NONE. NO MORE UNDER NON-AGENDA ITEMS. OKAY. ANY ANY NON AGENDIZED PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS ONLINE. YES. PROMOTING CC. HI EVERYONE. CAN YOU HEAR ME? ONE SECOND. GO AHEAD. HI. HELLO CITY STAFF AND COUNCIL. MY NAME IS CECILIA AND I AM THE PROGRAM [00:15:06] COORDINATOR FOR COACHELLA UNINCORPORATED. I AM ALSO A CONCERNED COMMUNITY MEMBER OF THE EAST VALLEY. I AM SPEAKING TO ADDRESS THE DATA CENTER PROJECT PROPOSAL IN THE CITY OF COACHELLA. SPECIFICALLY, I'M IMAGINING DEMANDING THE CITY STAFF AND COUNCIL TO CONTINUE TO USE ALL OF THEIR EFFORTS AND RESOURCES TO DEVELOP A STRONG CITY ORDINANCE TO BAN DATA CENTER PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF COACHELLA. I URGE THE STAFF REPORTING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO BE ETHICAL, HONEST AND TO DO THEIR VERY BEST IN SHOWING THE REAL CONSEQUENCES AND IMPACTS OF DATA CENTERS, DATA CENTERS, SUCH AS THE ONE THAT WAS BEING PROPOSED, OCCUPIES 450 ACRES OF LAND THAT WILL HAVE IRREVERSIBLE DAMAGES TO RESIDENTS HEALTH AND OUR NATURAL RESOURCES. I URGE THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL TO DO EVERYTHING IN THEIR POWER TO ALLOW NOTHING LESS THAN A CITY ORDINANCE BANNING DATA CENTERS IN COACHELLA. ESSENTIALLY, I URGE ALL OF YOU TO NOT BE PRESSURED OR INTIMIDATED INTO CONTINUING AN AGREEMENT WITH STRONGHOLD POWER SYSTEMS OR ANY DATA CENTER DEVELOPER. THE RISKS OF A DATA CENTER, SPECIFICALLY OF THIS SIZE OUTWEIGH ANY COMMUNITY BENEFITS AGREEMENT. PEOPLE WOULD BECOME SICK. OUR SCARCE WATER SUPPLY WILL BE WASTED, AND ELECTRICITY BILLS ARE SURE TO SKYROCKET. SHOULD YOU NOT END THIS PROJECT, PLEASE ACT ACCORDINGLY TO WHAT YOUR POSITIONS ARE INTENDED TO DO AND PROTECT RESIDENTS AND CREATE THRIVING COMMUNITIES. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS ONLINE? IF THERE'S ANYBODY ON ZOOM WHO WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. THERE [Council Organization] ARE NONE. OKAY. WITH THAT? WE WILL MOVE ON TO COUNCIL ORGANIZATION AT THIS TIME. ITEM NUMBER SIX NOMINATION FOR THE POSITION OF THE MAYOR PRO TEM. I KNOW THAT IN THE. WE DON'T HAVE A FORMAL ROTATION PROCESS, BUT I JUST WANTED TO ASK COUNCIL MEMBER PEREZ SHE'D BE INTERESTED IN IN SERVING AS MAYOR PRO TEM. AND IF NOT, THEN MY. MY MOTION DIES. SO JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I SECOND THAT SHE HASN'T SAID YES, THOUGH I ALWAYS. I WANT TO ASK. SO UNLESS NOT. BUT THEN I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE BECAUSE THERE'S A THERE'S NEVER BEEN A FORMAL ROTATION. SO JUST WANTED TO ASK HER IF SHE'S NOT INTERESTED IN. TOTALLY UNDERSTAND. YES. YES. OKAY. NOT SECOND. SO SHE ACCEPTS MY MOTION. SO WE HAVE A MOTION BY THE MAYOR. SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ. YEAH. UNLESS THERE IS ANY OTHER SUBSEQUENT MOTION ON THE FLOOR. SEEING NONE. OKAY. ROLL CALL, COUNCIL MEMBER. PEREZ. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. DELGADO. YES. COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ AND MAYOR FIGUEROA, I CONGRATULATIONS. MAYOR PRO TEM PEREZ. WITH THAT, WE WILL MOVE ON TO. THERE IS NO [Written Communications] PROCLAMATIONS PRESENTATIONS AT THIS TIME IN WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. I CAN READ THEM. THE ONES THAT WE RECEIVED. SO WE RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS FROM CLAUDIA SERRANO FOR ITEM NUMBER 29 OPPOSING CECILIA. A NON AGENDA ITEM ON DATA CENTER OPPOSITION. CLAUDIA ESCOBAR ITEM 29 OPPOSING ITEM 29. AND CECILIA LLAMAS, ITEM NUMBER 13 IN FAVOR. AND WITH THAT, THOSE WERE ALL THE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS THAT [Consent Calendar] CAME IN BEFORE 12 P.M. CORRECT. WITH THAT, MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND IT IS RECOMMENDED THE CONSENT ITEMS BE ACTED UPON SIMULTANEOUSLY UNLESS SEPARATE DISCUSSIONS AND INTERACTIONS IS REQUESTED BY A COUNCIL MEMBER. WHAT ARE THE MOTIONS? AND THEN FOR THE RECORD, WORKING WITH OUR NEW COUNCIL MEMBER HERE FOR THIS IS THE TIME YOU CAN PULL THEM. YEAH. OKAY, SO I'D LIKE TO PULL UP ITEM NUMBER 23 FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION. JUST A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS IN THERE AND CONCERNS. START WITH THAT ONE. AND I WANT TO PULL ITEMS. 15, 16, 18 AND 19. AND IT'S JUST A GENERAL QUESTION ABOUT SCHEDULE OF CLEANING FOR THOSE ITEMS. SO THOSE SERVICE CONTRACTS 15, 16, 15, 17, 18 AND 19. SO. ANY OTHER ITEMS BEING REQUESTED TO BE PULLED FOR DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS FROM STAFF. SEEING NONE, WE CAN START WITH. [00:20:04] COUNCILMEMBER. I'D SUGGEST THAT WE LOOK AT THE THE WHAT'S LEFT ON CONSENT. OKAY. SO THEN APPROVE EVERYTHING BUT THOSE. SO MOTION. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEMS 15, 17, 18 AND 19 AND ITEM NUMBER 23, AS STATED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ. THE MOTION A MOTION TO APPROVE. YEAH. SECOND, I'LL GO AHEAD AND SECOND. OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER. PEREZ. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. DELGADO. YES. COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ AND MAYOR FIGUEROA, I OKAY WITH THAT? WELL, WE'LL START WITH ANDREW. I THINK [Items 15 & 17] ANDREW'S FOR THE FIRST ITEM. SO. I GUESS WE CAN TAKE THEM ONE AT A TIME. SO ITEM NUMBER 15 IS, OH, I JUST PULLED OUT. I THINK MY MY QUESTION THOUGH IS BECAUSE THEY ALL WENT TO RFP PROCESS. RIGHT. THE PACKET MY QUESTION IS VINTAGE WAS DOING ALREADY SOME OF THE PARKS. RIGHT. SO I THINK JUST MY QUESTION IS IN THIS NEW CONTRACT, IS IT STIPULATED LIKE THE THE PARK CLEANING OR KIND OF WHAT HOW DO THEY LIKE INFORM? LIKE, HOW DOES THAT WORK REALLY? BECAUSE I'VE GOTTEN COMMENTS ABOUT LIKE CLEANLINESS, WHEN IS THE. YES. SO WITH THE NEW CONTRACT WITH RFP, WE DID SPECIFICALLY PUT IN THERE THAT THEY NEED TO BE CLEANING THE PARKS AND EMPTYING THE TRASH A MINIMUM OF TWICE PER DAY ON WEEKENDS, WHICH IS AN INCREASE FROM PREVIOUS BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THAT'S BEEN A CONTINUED COMPLAINT. SO THAT IS IN THE NEW CONTRACT. OKAY. AND THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THEIR SCHEDULE AS WELL. OKAY. SO THAT WOULD INCLUDE FOR ITEMS 15 AND 17. OKAY. AND 18 IS JUST CITY PARKS. AND THAT'S THE RESTROOMS, RIGHT? [18. Maintenance Services Agreement with Vintage Associates, Inc. in the amount of $329,550.00 for Landscape Maintenance Services of City Parks and Facilities Project No. PW 2026-03.] IS THAT WHAT THAT ONE IS? 18. OR IS THAT MORE OF A LARGER OVERLAY? 18 IS ALL OTHER SMALLER PARK FACILITIES. SO LAS FLORES IS A SEPARATE BILL THAT IS A SEPARATE BILL. JUST BECAUSE THOSE ARE ITEMIZED IN OUR BUDGET AS SEPARATE ITEMS. AND THE OTHER ONES ARE ALL THE OTHER PARKS. THAT WOULD BE FIFTH STREET, YOU KNOW, SIERRA VISTA, THE VETERANS PARK, ALL THE OTHER PARKS ARE LUMPED TOGETHER IN THAT ONE CONTRACT, AND THAT'S INCLUDED IN THERE AS WELL WITH THE WITH THE TRASH REMOVAL ON WEEKENDS. SO THEY ARE REQUIRED TO DO TRASH REMOVAL ON SATURDAYS AND SUNDAYS. OKAY. AND THEN MY LAST QUESTION FOR NUMBER 19 WITH THE SOUTHWEST LANDSCAPE, I THINK IT WOULD BE THIS IS FOR THE LANDS, RIGHT? AND I THINK IT WOULD BE IMPORTANT THAT WHEN YOU DO YOUR LMD MEETINGS, THAT YOU BRING THEM OUT WHEN YOU DO THEM. SO THAT THAT WAY, LIKE THEY CAN HEAR LIKE THEIR SUPERVISOR MANAGER FOR THAT, SO THEY CAN HEAR KIND OF QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS ON THE LMD AND JUST HEAR THEM OUT. SO I THINK THAT'S JUST A WAS MORE OF A COMMENT, I DON'T KNOW A SUGGESTION FOR YOU THAT THEY SHOULD COME. THAT'S THAT'S A GOOD SUGGESTION. I APPRECIATE THAT AND WE'LL TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT AS WE MOVE FORWARD. OKAY. AND ANDREW, MY QUESTION IS THE 25 CONTINGENCY. HAS THAT BEEN THE SAME TO PRIOR LANDSCAPING COMPANIES? IT'S ALWAYS BEEN A 25% HAVE ALWAYS INCLUDED THAT 25% CONTINGENCY THAT ALLOWS FOR REPLACEMENT OF LARGER ITEMS TO TREES IF THERE'S DAMAGE DUE TO EROSION, VANDALISM, THOSE KINDS OF THINGS. MY CONCERN IS I KNOW THAT THE COMPANY THAT WAS DOING ONE OF THE LMDS IS NOT ON HERE, SO I DON'T KNOW IF THEY'RE NO LONGER GOING TO BE WORKING WITH THE CITY OR NOT. BUT I SAW THEM PLANT THREE TIMES AND THEY DIED. AND I SAW ACROSS THE STREET, WHICH WAS THE CITY OF INDIO, THEIR PLANTS WERE NEVER BEING REPLANTED. SO MY CONCERN IS JUST THE 25% CONTINGENCY PLAN THAT WE'RE GIVING THEM THAT ALLOWS THEM TO KEEP PLANNING AND CHARGING US FOR THAT WHEN THEY SHOULD BE CARING FOR THOSE PLANTS. I BELIEVE THAT'S ACTUALLY INCLUDED IN THE REGULAR CONTRACT. SO THOSE REPLACEMENT PLANTS AS PART OF THEIR REGULAR CONTRACT, THE CONTINGENCY IS KIND OF WORK THAT'S ABOVE AND BEYOND. SO REPLACEMENT OF DEAD MATERIAL IS IS PART OF THE CONTRACT PRICE. SO IF THESE PLANTS DIE, THERE IS A WARRANTY ON THAT THAT THEY WILL REPLACE THEM AT NO COST OR THERE IS A COST. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. COUNCILMEMBER, ITEM NUMBER 23. THIS IS REGARDING EDWIN TECHNOLOGIES. THANK YOU. YEAH. I HAVE A QUESTION AND ALSO A COMMENT. I KNOW EDWIN TECHNOLOGIES IS GOING TO BE CONNECTING TO OUR PORTALS FROM THE OUTSIDE ACCOUNTS AND INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS, AND I'M PRETTY MUCH SURE WE'RE GOING TO GET THE TRAINING NECESSARY. BUT MY CONCERN IS WHEN OUR BANKING INSTITUTIONS UPDATE THEIR AUTHENTICATORS, ARE WE GOING TO HAVE TO LOG IN BACK IN? ARE WE GOING TO LOSE SOME INFORMATION THERE? AND ALSO, IF WE ARE TRAINED HOW TO DEAL WITH RANSOM, RANSOMWARE AND SOME DATA HOSTAGE THAT WE CAN GET, BE [00:25:11] EXPOSED TO THAT BECAUSE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT BANKING INSTITUTIONS AND INVESTMENTS, AND THEN WE HAVE A CYBER INSURANCE. YEAH, WE, WE DO HAVE CYBER INSURANCE. THEY DO HAVE SINGLE SIGN ON TECHNOLOGY, WHICH IS WHAT OUR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS RUN ON. THERE'S DUAL FACTOR AUTHENTICATION. AND THEY, THEY WORK WITH SEVERAL OF THE BANKS ALREADY WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTS THAT ARE OUT THERE. THE. TO BEGIN WITH, WE COULD ACTUALLY DO, YOU KNOW, MANUAL PULLS FROM THE BANK AND UPLOAD THEM THAT WAY, BUT THEY ARE REQUIRED PER OUR PURCHASING POLICY TO PROVIDE US WITH A SOC2 REPORT, WHICH IS BASICALLY AN AUDIT ON THEIR INTERNAL CONTROLS. AND THAT IS AN EXTERNAL AUDIT THAT THEY WOULD HAVE PERFORMED ON THE SECURITY OF THEIR DATA TRANSMISSION PROTOCOLS. OKAY. YEAH, BECAUSE THAT WAS MY CONCERN BECAUSE I KNOW RECENTLY ON MARCH 2026, THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY, YOU KNOW, THEY GOT PARALYZED BECAUSE THEY GOT ATTACKED. THEY INFILTRATED, INFILTRATED THE, THE CITY, AND THEY HAD TO DECLARE A LOCAL STATE OF EMERGENCY. SO I'M JUST, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, IT'S A GOOD IT'S A GOOD SYSTEM. I DID A LITTLE BIT OF RESEARCH ON IT. AND I'M ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS, WHICH IS UP TO $1,000,002 MILLION ON THEIR SYSTEM. SO WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE PROTECTED. YOU KNOW, IF WE'RE PUTTING ALL THAT INFORMATION INTO THE SYSTEM, CERTAINLY. YEAH. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THOSE ITEMS? IF NOT, WE CAN NOW WE CAN APPROVE THE REMAINING ITEMS FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR, WHICH IS ITEMS 15, FOUR, 15, 17, 18, 19 AND 23. AND NOW MOTION TO APPROVE THOSE ITEMS. SECOND. THERE'S A SECOND. OKAY. AND BROKAW WHO DID? SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ. OH, SORRY. SECOND. YEAH. COUNCILMEMBER DELGADO YES. COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ HI. MAYOR PRO TEM PEREZ YES. AND MAYOR FIGUEROA, I OKAY WITH [New Business Calendar (Legislative and Administrative)] THAT. WE'LL MOVE ON TO NEW BUSINESS. JUST FOR THE RECORD, IF FOLKS WEREN'T HERE EARLIER, WE DID POSTPONE ITEM NUMBER 25 TO THE MEETING OF JULY 8TH. AND WE HAVE ALSO POSTPONED ITEM NUMBER 26. WITH THAT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 27, WHICH IS APPROVAL OF A SOFTWARE LICENSE AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CLEAR GOV INC FOR BUDGETING, FINANCIAL REPORTING AND TRANSPARENCY SOLUTIONS. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF CONVERSATIONS RECENTLY ABOUT INCREASING TRANSPARENCY WITH THE PUBLIC AND ADA COMPLIANCE AND THINGS ALONG THOSE LINES, I'VE BEEN IN CONVERSATIONS WITH CLEAR GOV TECHNOLOGIES. THEY OFFER A SOLUTION THAT I THINK WOULD BENEFIT THE CITY VERY WELL. SO THE CURRENT FINANCE PROCESSES CARRY SOME OPERATIONAL RISK AND AUDIT RISK. SO THERE'S DELAYED FINANCIAL REPORTING. RIGHT NOW. THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS WE'VE ISSUED OUR ACT FOR OR OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS LATE AS APRIL 30TH DUE TO THE MANUAL PRACTICES STAFF TURNOVER. WE HAVE MANUAL SPREADSHEETS AND WORKFLOWS FOR BUDGETING AND REPORTING. AND THERE'S ALWAYS ERRORS OR POSSIBILITY OF ERRORS IN SPREADSHEETS THROUGH FORMULAS AND THINGS THAT GET BROKEN. THIS SOLUTION ALLOWS AUDIT AND VERSION CONTROL. SO WE REDUCE THAT RISK. WE ALLOW IT STOPS THE THE POSSIBILITY FOR BROKEN FORMULAS AND THINGS THAT THREATEN DATA INTEGRITY IN THE BUDGETING AND REPORTING PROCESS. THERE'S ALSO RIGHT NOW LIMITED PUBLIC TRANSPARENCY. WE PROVIDE INVESTMENT REPORTS MONTHLY. WE PROVIDE THE CHECKLIST LISTINGS. EACH MEETING, WE DO A RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS AND FUND BALANCE REPORTING. BUT THIS TOOL WOULD ALLOW US TO ACTUALLY HAVE AN ONLINE PORTAL WHERE PEOPLE COULD GO IN AND SEE REAL TIME, WHERE WE'RE AT BUDGET TO ACTUAL ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE INDIVIDUAL GL ACCOUNT. AT ANY POINT THROUGHOUT THE YEAR, THEY COULD LOOK BACKWARDS, THEY COULD SEE WHAT OUR BUDGET IS FOR THE COMING YEAR AND REALLY DIG IN AND HAVE INCREASED [00:30:02] TRANSPARENCY THAT WE'VE BEEN HEARING. RESIDENTS ARE ARE WANTING. SO WHAT WE WOULD BE PURCHASING IS A SINGLE INTEGRATED PLATFORM SPANNING THE FULL FINANCIAL CYCLE. SO IT INCLUDES BUDGETING AND PLANNING SUITE FOR OPERATIONAL CAPITAL AND PERSONNEL BUDGETING. THE IT HAS MULTI-YEAR FORECASTING AND STRATEGIC PLANNING BUILT IN, AND THERE'S A DIGITAL BUDGET BOOK OUTPUT THAT'S ALIGNED TO GFOA AWARD CRITERIA. I WAS ABLE TO GET THE GFOA AWARD LAST YEAR FOR OUR BUDGET BOOK, AND I'M SUBMITTING IT AGAIN THIS YEAR, BUT IT'S A HIGHLY INTENSIVE, SPREADSHEET DRIVEN PROCESS. THIS SUITE ALONE WOULD PROBABLY SAVE US AT LEAST 160 STAFF HOURS, IF NOT MORE. THE FINANCIAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE, OR THE DISCLOSURE STUDIO AUTOMATES THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION PROCESS, AND IT'S ALIGNED WITH GASB AND GFOA, WHICH ARE THE STANDARD SETTING BOARD AND THE FINANCIAL BOARD OFFICERS ASSOCIATION. THERE'S A ROLE BASED ACCESS WITH FULL VERSION HISTORY, SO YOU CAN SEE WHO MADE CHANGES WHEN, AND YOU CAN UNDO IF IT'S NOT APPROPRIATE. IT IS ADA COMPLIANT AND AUDIT READY REPORT OUTPUTS ON BOTH THE BUDGET AND THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THE TRANSPARENCY SUITE IS A PUBLIC FACING FINANCIAL DASHBOARD. IT'S RESIDENT FRIENDLY AND IT HAS VISUAL STORYTELLING, AND IT SUPPORTS THE CITY'S OPEN GOVERNANCE COMMITMENT. FOR THE PROCUREMENT. WE DID GO THROUGH A COLLECTIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH OMNIA. ACCORDING TO THE CITY PURCHASING POLICY. WE CAN DO THAT IN LIEU OF GOING OUT FOR AN OFFICIAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. BASICALLY, OMNIA DID A NATIONWIDE RFP, AND SO THEY ARE COMPETITIVELY BID. AND THEN USING THAT CLEAR, GOV THEN OFFERED THE CITY PRICING BELOW THE PUBLISHED COOPERATIVE CONTRACT RATES THROUGH A DIRECT NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT. SO OUR SAVINGS, BY DOING A DIRECT NEGOTIATION AFTER THE OMNIA COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT IS SAVING US ABOUT 22,300 OVER THREE YEARS. SO THE INVESTMENT SUMMARY, THE SETUP IS A ONE TIME COST OF 40,200. THE SUBSCRIPTION WOULD BE 78,005 30 IN THE FIRST YEAR, 86, 579 IN THE SECOND YEAR, AND 90,908 IN THE THIRD YEAR FOR A TOTAL ALL IN COST OF 296217. WE FEEL THAT THESE COSTS WILL BE FULLY RECUPERATED BY THE TIME SAVINGS THAT ARE GENERATED, AND SAVING MONTHS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT ISSUANCE AND ALLOWING FOR THE BUDGET TO BE PREPARED IN A IN A EASIER VERSION CONTROL MANNER. SO THE RETURN ON INVESTMENT ACCELERATED FINANCIAL REPORTING, SAVING FOUR MONTHS ON ISSUANCE, RECLAIMING STAFF CAPACITY. EACH YEAR, WE WERE ABLE TO GAIN SAVINGS ON TOP OF WHAT THE COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT IDENTIFIED. THERE'S REDUCED AUDIT AND DATA INTEGRITY RISK. HAVING A SINGLE SOURCE OF TRUTH MAKES IT EASIER TO AVOID COMMON AUDIT PITFALLS. AND THEN IT'S A GFOA AWARD READY REPORTING TOOL. SO OUR RECOMMENDATION IS TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SOFTWARE LICENSE AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH CLEAR GOV INCORPORATED NOT TO EXCEED 296217 OVER THREE YEARS, SECURED THROUGH COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AND NEGOTIATED BELOW COOPERATIVE CONTRACT PRICING. WITH THAT, I DO HAVE SOMEONE FROM CLEAR GOV. HIS NAME IS PAUL FELTON THAT HAS A COUPLE OF SLIDES HE'D LIKE TO GO OVER WITH YOU AS WELL. GOOD EVENING. CAN YOU GUYS HEAR ME OKAY. YES. YOU. YES. GOOD EVENING. STAFF, COACH ELLIS STAFF AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. MY NAME IS PAUL FELTON. I'M ONE OF THE SALES DIRECTORS HERE AT CLEAR GOV. I'VE BEEN IN THE BUDGETING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING SPACE FOR ALMOST TEN YEARS. I HAD THE PLEASURE OF WORKING WITH LINCOLN AT A AT A PRIOR CITY WITH A PREVIOUS VERSION OF THIS SOFTWARE. SO AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING CLOSELY TOGETHER TO TRY TO, YOU KNOW, [00:35:04] PARTNER WITH THE CITY TO, TO BRING A LOT OF EFFICIENCIES WITH A FULL BUDGET SUITE AND, AND ACT FOR REPORTING. I THINK WE JUST HAVE A COUPLE SLIDES HERE TO SHARE WITH YOU. CAN YOU PUT THE SLIDES BACK ON? JASON. YEAH. PERFECT. YEAH. SO JUST A LITTLE BIT ABOUT CLEAR GOV. IF YOU CAN JUST GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. LINCOLN BASICALLY CLEAR GOV HAS BEEN IN THE MARKET FOR OVER TEN YEARS. AND THEY MERGED WITH GRAVITY IN OFFICIALLY IN JANUARY. AND TOGETHER BOTH PLATFORMS OFFERED FULL END TO END BUDGETING AND ALSO WHAT WE CALL NOW DISCLOSURE STUDIO, WHICH IS THE ACT FOR BUDGET BOOK AND ALSO QUARTERLY AND MONTHLY REPORTS AND BASICALLY ALL IN ONE SOFTWARE FOR LINCOLN STAFF TO PRODUCE THE BUDGET TO, YOU KNOW, THROUGHOUT THE WITH ALL DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS AND A COLLABORATIVE ONE STOP SHOP. AND THEN FROM THERE, ALL THAT DATA FLOWS INTO A DIGITAL BUDGET BOOK. AND FROM THERE WE HAVE A FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY PORTAL WHERE ELECTED OFFICIALS, STAFF AND CITIZENS CAN ENGAGE DIRECTLY WITH THE CITY. THERE'S SOME AI TOOLS THAT ALLOWS THEM TO SEARCH THROUGH THE BUDGET BOOK, ASK QUESTIONS WITHIN THE BUDGET BOOK, AND THEN THERE'S A DIRECT FULL CIRCLE COMMUNICATION TOOL FOR THE CITY TO GENERATE QUESTIONS FOR THE PUBLIC AND FOR THE PUBLIC TO ASK THEIR OWN QUESTIONS OF THE CITY TO HAVE A FULL, TRANSPARENT, ENGAGING CONVERSATION WITH YOUR CONSTITUENTS. NEXT SLIDE. AND I THINK YOU CAN JUST CYCLE THROUGH UNTIL ALL THE LOGOS, ALL THE INFORMATION SHOWS UP THERE. SO BASICALLY, LIKE I SAID, FULL BUDGET CYCLE MANAGEMENT SUITE, OPERATING PERSONNEL, CAPITAL BUDGET DEVELOPMENT, CULMINATING WITH A DIGITAL BUDGET BOOK AND THEN POST BUDGET, WE OFFER AN AUTOMATED ACFR SOLUTION, BOTH BOTH THE BUDGET BOOK AND THE ACT FOR OUR ADA COMPLIANT AND HAVE A GFOA AWARD CHECKLIST TO ENSURE THAT THE CITY IS GETTING THOSE AWARDS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. THEN ALSO THE FINANCIAL ENGAGEMENT PIECE, WHICH IS THE TRANSPARENCY PIECE AND THE ENGAGEMENT PIECE FOR RESIDENT CITIZENS, ELECTED OFFICIALS, ETC. TO SEE WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE BUDGET THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. AND THEN WE ALSO THROUGHOUT THE, YOU KNOW, AS, AS THE YEAR PROGRESSES, SEEING ALL THE DIFFERENT CAPITAL PROJECTS ON A MAP AND SEEING PROGRESS OF CAPITAL INFRASTRUCTURE THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. SO AGAIN, FULL CYCLE MANAGEMENT TOOLS AGAIN, WHICH ARE NOT USUALLY OFFERED WITH THE CITIES OR MOST CITIES, ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS. AND THIS ALLOWS FOR, YOU KNOW, GREAT COMMUNICATION. I HEARD SOMEONE SPEAKING ABOUT SOC2 COMPLIANCE. SO FROM A SECURITY STANDPOINT, WE MEET ALL THESE REGULATIONS AS WELL FOR FOR SAFETY AND COMPLIANCE. TWO MORE SLIDES. JUST A HIGH LEVEL UNDERSTANDING OF JUST A FEW LOGOS. WE'VE GOT. WE JUST AS OF THIS WEEK ON A LINKEDIN POST TODAY, WE HAVE 2000 CUSTOMERS ACROSS THE U.S. BETWEEN CITIES, COUNTIES, STATE AGENCIES, K-12, HIGHER ED. THESE ARE JUST A FEW OF THE LOGOS WE HAVE. AND THEN LAST SLIDE. WE ALWAYS TRY TO ALIGN WITH CITIES, COUNTIES, STATE AGENCIES, GOALS, RIGHT? SO FINANCIAL STABILIZATION, DISCIPLINE, HAVING, YOU KNOW, ONE, ONE PLATFORM FOR ALL DEPARTMENTS AND EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP TO COMMUNICATE AND COLLABORATE ON THE BUDGET AS IT'S BEING DEVELOPED, EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT, HAVING, YOU KNOW, LESS SILOS, DEVELOPING EMPLOYEES RETENTION IS REALLY DIFFICULT IN GOVERNMENT. SO HAVING MODERN SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR EMPLOYEES TO USE IS, IS WHERE EVERYONE IS MOVING TODAY AND IT'S GREATLY NEEDED. AND THEN OBVIOUSLY WHERE WE'RE ADDING TRANSPARENCY HERE, KNOWING, YOU KNOW, SPEAKING TO A LOT OF THE GOALS THAT LINCOLN HAS BROUGHT TO THE TABLE IN TERMS OF BEING MORE FINANCIAL, FINANCIALLY TRANSPARENT WITH NOT ONLY INTERNALLY BUT EXTERNALLY WITH THE PUBLIC. IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY. AND THEN ALSO, PAUL, THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION. THIS I SERVE ON THE MOSQUITO VECTOR CONTROL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, AND I SERVE AS THE TREASURER, SO I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THIS SUITE DOES. AND IT'S ALSO POWERED BY GOOGLE TRANSLATE. SO THAT MEANS THE BUDGET BOOK IS RELATIVELY ACCESSIBLE TO COMMUNITY MEMBERS IN THEIR OWN LANGUAGE AS WELL. CORRECT? ABSOLUTELY. SO, YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT BECAUSE THEN IT TRANSLATES EVERYTHING AND PEOPLE CAN SIT DOWN AND READ THAT BUDGET BOOK [00:40:02] ON THE WEB BASED AND AS WELL AS DOWNLOADING IT. CORRECT. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL. SO THIS SYSTEM WILL ALSO CONNECT TO OUR ERP. YES IT WILL. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH. ONE, IT'LL BE A ONE WAY, A ONE WAY INTEGRATION SO THAT YOUR ERP SYSTEM IS STILL YOUR SYSTEM OF TRUTH. AND THEN ONCE THE CITY BUILDS THEIR BUDGET, THEY'LL BE ABLE TO DO A MANUAL UPLOAD, SAME FILE FORMAT RIGHT BACK INTO THE ERP SYSTEM. I NOTICED ON THE AGREEMENT, IT COMES WITH THE TRAINING. HOW LONG IS THE TRAINING FOR FOR OUR STAFF? YEAH, TYPICALLY THE DEPLOYMENTS, BASICALLY THE, THE TYPICAL DEPLOYMENTS FOR LIKE BUDGET CYCLE MANAGEMENT, IT'S ABOUT THREE MONTHS AND ALSO ABOUT A THREE MONTH DEPLOYMENT FOR THE, FOR THE, FOR, FOR THE ACFR. AND THEN PART OF THAT IS ABOUT TEN HOURS OR TWO WEEKS OF, OF HANDS ON TRAINING WITH, WITH THE ADMINISTRATORS AND WITH STAFF. THANK YOU. AND, AND WITH, WITH YOUR CONTRACT, WE HAVE A PRETTY STANDARD TICKETING SUPPORT SYSTEM. AND THEN EACH ENTITY WE SERVE HAS A DEDICATED, A REAL PERSON CUSTOMER SUCCESS MANAGER THAT PERFORMS, YOU KNOW, QUARTERLY BUSINESS REVIEWS WITH THE CITY, MAKE SURE THAT STAFF IS TRAINED. WE DO SEE A LOT OF TURNOVER IN GOVERNMENT. SO WE PROVIDE A LOT OF RESOURCES TO MAKE SURE, YOU KNOW, STAFF IS TRAINED AND ENABLED ON THE SOFTWARE. AND IF THE CONTRACT IS APPROVED, HOW LONG WOULD IT TAKE TO ACTUALLY BE UP AND RUNNING WHERE THE COMMUNITY CAN ACTUALLY LOG ON AND LOOK UP BUDGETS AND SO FORTH, I BELIEVE. YEAH. SO THE TRANSPARENCY WAS GOING TO BE THE FIRST THING THAT THAT I WANTED TO GET OUT THERE WAS TO HAVE THAT PICTURE OUT THERE, BECAUSE WE ALREADY HAVE THE BUDGET BUILT, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO, IT'D PROBABLY BE NEXT YEAR BEFORE THE BUDGET IS ACTUALLY IN THEIR SOFTWARE FORMAT AND PUBLISHED THROUGH THEIR SYSTEM. UNLESS WE BUILD IT NOW, AFTER IT'S DONE TO PUT IT IN THEIR SYSTEM, THE ACFR. WILL PROBABLY GO FIRST, AND THEN WE'LL TRY AND PUBLISH THIS YEAR USING THE ACFR SOFTWARE, AND THEN HAVE THE BUDGET READY FOR THIS NEXT BUDGET CYCLE. OKAY. THANK YOU. I THINK IT'S IT'S A GOOD SYSTEM, ESPECIALLY FOR TRANSPARENCY AND, AND ACCOUNTABILITY, TO ALLOW OUR RESIDENTS TO ACTUALLY LOG ON AND NOT JUST BE IN ENGLISH, BUT ALSO IN SPANISH WHERE THEY CAN UNDERSTAND IT. SO I THINK IT'S GOOD. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? I NOTICED THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT COVERS A THREE YEAR STARTING JULY 1ST. AM I CORRECT? CORRECT. THANK. SEEN OVER THE CONVERSATION. IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM? FOR THAT ONE? NO. OKAY. SEEING NONE. NONE ONLINE. OKAY. I ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I'LL GO AHEAD. MOTION. IS IT FIRST? SECOND, THERE'S THE FIRST AND SECOND. AND THAT'S A MOTION TO APPROVE. CORRECT. COUNCILMEMBER. YES. YES. AGREEMENT. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER DELGADO. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. MARTINEZ. AYE. MAYOR PRO TEM PEREZ. YES. AND MAYOR FIGUEROA. AYE. THANK YOU. WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 28. MAYOR'S APPOINTMENTS TO VARIOUS COUNCILS. SINCE WE DID HAVE SOME VACANCIES, WE DID BRING BACK THIS ITEM. SO THE FIRST ONE IS WE NEED TO THE THERE'S ONE THAT WE DID GET CORRECTION. THE OVERSIGHT BOARD OF SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE COACHELLA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WILL HAVE TO APPOINT OUR NEW CITY MANAGER, MR. GUS ROMO, ON THAT FOR THE RECORD. SO THAT ONE. THANK YOU, RYAN, FOR HELPING US IDENTIFY THAT ON THAT ITEM. THE OTHER VACANCIES ARE THE SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY SUBCOMMITTEE, THE SISTER CITY SUBCOMMITTEE, THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AT CVAG, AND THE JPA, COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERVATION COMMISSION, CCBC, AS WELL AS THE COACHELLA INDIO WASTE TRANSFER STATION, JOINT POWER AUTHORITY AND THE WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACT AMENDMENT AD HOC. SO I KNOW WE HAVE THE NEW COUNCIL MEMBER, AND I WANTED TO SEE WHICH OF THOSE HE HAD CHOSEN THAT HE WANTED TO SERVE ON. I'D LIKE TO SERVE ON THE CVAG, THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AND. OKAY. ANY OTHER. IS IT THAT ONE? YEAH. OKAY. AND. I WAS ALSO GOING TO PLACE YOU IN THE. I WAS GOING TO PLACE YOU ON THE COACHELLA WASTE TRANSFER STATION ON THAT ONE. AND ALSO [00:45:02] THE WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACT ONE AS WELL. OKAY. THAT'S FINE WITH YOU. YEAH. AND THEN THE, THE JOINT WATER POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE AS WELL. JOINT POLICY, THE JOINT WATER POLICY, THEY ONLY MEET AS NEEDED. OKAY. YEAH, THAT ONE MEETS AS NEEDED. DID YOU WANT TO BE ON THE. I WANTED TO I WANTED TO SEEK THE SENIOR CENTER AND THEN THE CONSERVATION COMMISSION. OKAY. THAT'S FINE. OKAY, SO WE'LL PUT COUNCIL MEMBER DELGADO ON THE SENIOR CENTER AND THEN THE CONSERVATION, AND I'LL REMAIN AS THE ALTERNATE ON THAT ONE. AND THEN. SENIOR CENTER. AND THEN MR. MARTINEZ, I WAS ALSO GOING TO PUT YOU ON THE SISTER CITY ONE WITH MYSELF. IS THAT FINE? AND THEN YOU DID MENTION A YOU MENTIONED. YEAH. OKAY. YOU MENTIONED IT. OKAY. AND I DID. YEAH. OKAY. I'M GOOD. OKAY. THE SISTER CITIES, THE SISTER CITIES. YEAH. AND THEN COUNCILMEMBER DELGADO WILL BE ON THE SENIOR CENTER. COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ WILL BE ON THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AND THEN ALSO ON THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. ADELIA WILL HAVE. DO YOU WANT TO STAY AS THE ALTERNATE? I'LL STAY AS THE ALTERNATE. OKAY. WE'LL LEAVE HER AS THE ALTERNATE FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. AND THEN. I THINK THOSE WERE ALL THE CHANGES. AND I HAVE SOME NOTES ALSO HERE SO WE CAN CONNECT AFTERWARDS ON, ON, ON HERE. SO OKAY, WITH THAT, I ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THOSE CHANGES AS PRESENTED. AND THEN I WILL SEND OUT AN UPDATED APPOINTMENT. AND WE ENSURE THAT WE GET THOSE EMAILS OUT ON THE UPDATES FOR CVAG SO PEOPLE CAN ATTEND THOSE. OKAY. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION AND I WILL MOTION TO APPROVE THESE COMMITTEES AND APPOINTMENTS. I'LL SECOND THERE'S A SECOND. OKAY. A FIRST AND A SECOND ROLL CALL, PLEASE. COUNCILMEMBER. YES. COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ. AYE. MAYOR PRO TEM PEREZ YES. AND MAYOR FIGUEROA. AYE. OKAY. WITH THAT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 28. AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND EXECUTE 14TH AMENDMENT AND RE AND RESTATED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF COACHELLA AND THE SPORTS LEAGUE AND ESTABLISHING FIELD USE FEES FOR THE 2627 SPORTS SEASON. AND WE HAVE ONE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEM 29. OKAY. IT'S. YEAH, I'LL. OKAY. SHALL WE DO THE PUBLIC PRESENTATION? AND THEN IF THERE'S MORE PUBLIC COMMENTS, THIS IS THE TIME. IF ANYONE'S GOING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOU FILL OUT A FORM IN THE BACK AND SUBMIT IT TO THE CITY CLERK AT THIS TIME. ANDREW. OKAY. SO WE ACTUALLY HAVE TWO ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSING TONIGHT, BOTH THE POTENTIAL WAIVER OF OR REDUCTION OF FIELD USE FEES AND THE ADOPTION OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT MOU. SO FOR SOME BACKGROUND, IN APRIL 21ST, THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION UNANIMOUSLY, UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED TO CONTINUE THE RECREATION SERVICES WITH BOTH CVSL AND CSA ON MAY 13TH. THE. THOSE SAME RECOMMENDATIONS WERE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL AND ON MAY 19TH WE PRESENTED A DRAFT PRESENTATION OF THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE MOU, TO OUR PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, AND ON JUNE 16TH WE TOOK THOSE FINAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE MOU, TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, AND THEY DID RECOMMEND A CHANGE TO WHAT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WAS, WHICH I WILL GET INTO IN. AS I DO MY PRESENTATION. SO LOOKING AT WHY WE WANTED TO DO THIS MOU UPDATE, YOU KNOW, BASED ON A LOT OF FEEDBACK WE'VE HAD BOTH IN WHEN WE PUT OUT THE RFP AND WHEN WE AWARDED WITH THE TWO LEAGUES MOVING FORWARD, WE WANTED TO LOOK AT POTENTIAL STRICT ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES FOR THE PUBLIC INTOXICATION, STRICTER ENFORCEMENT PENALTIES FOR VIOLENT BEHAVIOR AND FIGHTING, UPDATED COMMUNICATION STANDARDS BETWEEN THE LEAGUES AND THE CITY'S. WE DID WANT TO LOOK AT REEVALUATING THE FIELD USE, WHICH WILL BECOME A DISCUSSION TONIGHT, AND THEN UPDATING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND THEN ALSO EXTENDING THE TERM LENGTH. AS FAR AS THE PRIMARY CHANGES THAT ARE MADE IN THIS MOU FROM THE PREVIOUS MOU, WE DID CHANGE SOME OF THE RECITALS IN SECTION TWO, THE BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION DID REQUEST TO HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME ADDED TO THEIR OVERALL USAGE, AND THAT WAS GRANTED. AND THEN WE ALSO IN THE STAFF RECOMMENDED VERSION OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT WE WERE RECOMMENDING, AS HAD BEEN [00:50:07] DISCUSSED AT THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING AND AS HAD BEEN DISCUSSED AT CITY COUNCIL, SINCE THERE'S TWO LEAGUES TO HAVE THEM AT TWO SEPARATE PARKS. ON SECTION FIVE, WE DID HAVE PB AND K REWORK OUR GENERAL LIABILITY AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, SO WE'RE VERY HAPPY WITH HOW THAT HAS BEEN REWRITTEN. WE'RE RECOMMENDING TO APPROVE THAT AS WRITTEN BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. WE MADE A SMALL MODIFICATION TO THE RECORD KEEPING SECTION IN 6.8, JUST TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE THE BETTER RECORD KEEPING, AND THAT ALL COMMUNICATION IS BEING CONDUCTED IN WRITING. WE WE COMPLETELY REWROTE SECTION NINE, THE CODE OF CONDUCT AND ENFORCEMENT. THAT WAS KIND OF THE MOST IMPORTANT SECTION THAT WE'VE GOTTEN A LOT OF COMMENTARY ABOUT FROM THE PUBLIC. SO WE HAVE REWRITTEN THAT SECTION, SECTION TEN. I JUST WE HAD CONSIDERED MAKING THE TERM A FIVE YEAR TERM INSTEAD OF A ONE YEAR TERM, SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO COME BACK HERE AND REEVALUATE THE MOU EVERY SINGLE YEAR. AND THEN BOTH EXHIBITS WERE JUST UPDATED SO THAT THEY'RE A LITTLE MORE CLEAR TO READ. RELATIVE TO THE FIELD. USE THE STAFF RECOMMENDED FIELD ALLOCATIONS AGAIN, WERE TO HAVE ONE LEAGUE AT EACH PARK. THIS WOULD RESULT IN A SLIGHT REDUCTION OF THE FIELD USE THAT HAD BEEN ALLOCATED TO CVSL FOR THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS. PREVIOUSLY. THAT'S THE WAY THE ARRANGEMENT WAS SET. SO IN IN PREVIOUS YEARS, FOR QUITE A WHILE, THAT'S HOW THE PARKS WERE ALWAYS ARRANGED, WHERE CECIL WAS AT AND CVSL HAD THE PARK USE AT LOS FORCE ONLY. AND FOR THE PAST 4 OR 5 YEARS, FIELD THREE AT DUMA PARK HAD BEEN ALLOCATED IN THE SPRINGTIME TO CVSL, SO THAT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PARKS AND RECREATION RECOMMENDATION AND THE CITY RECOMMENDATION IS JUST FIELD THREE FOR THE SPRINGTIME USE. SO THIS IS THE MODIFICATION TO SECTION TWO THAT WAS RECOMMENDED BY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION. AND I BELIEVE WE'VE HAD COMMENTS RECOMMENDING THAT THIS WOULD BE THE APPROVED ALLOCATION. SO YOU CAN SEE IN BLUE THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IF WE WERE TO ADOPT THIS CHANGE WOULD BE THAT FIELD THREE AT DUMA WOULD REMAIN WITH CVSL. SO THIS WOULD JUST BE KEEPING IT AT THE SAME FIELD ALLOCATION THAT WE'VE HAD FOR THE PAST FOUR YEARS. AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE BLUE STRIKE OUT. SO THAT FIELD THREE, INSTEAD OF BEING ALLOCATED TO CSO, WOULD BE ALLOCATED TO CVSL. THESE ARE THE UPDATED PARKS. YOU CAN SEE THIS IS FIELD THREE, FIELD THREE AND FOUR ARE FOOTBALL FIELDS. SO THAT'S WHY IT'S ONLY AVAILABLE IN THE SPRING SEASON BECAUSE FIELDS THREE AND FOUR ARE ALLOCATED TO OUR LITTLE ARABS FOOTBALL TEAMS DURING THE FALL. AND THIS IS JUST A PICTURE OF LAS FLORES PARK, WHICH HAS THE THREE FIELDS. RELATIVE TO THE CODE OF CONDUCT. THIS SECTION IN THE PREVIOUS SECTION IN THE PREVIOUS MOU IN THE 13TH AMENDMENT, THIS WAS ONE PARAGRAPH. SO THIS HAS BEEN FULLY REWRITTEN. WE NOW HAVE A CODE OF CONDUCT FOR ENFORCEMENT. WE HAVE PROHIBITED CONDUCT WHICH INCLUDES, YOU KNOW, DRINKING VIOLENCE, DISORDERLY CONDUCT, VANDALISM. WE HAVE A NEW SECTION FOR LEAGUE RESPONSIBILITIES. SO IT DOES STATE THAT THE LEAGUES NEED TO TAKE RESPONSIBLE STEPS TO PREVENT AND ADDRESS THE VIOLATIONS THAT ARE OCCURRING DURING THE PERMITTED USE. AND THEN IF THERE ARE CONTINUED VIOLATIONS, THEN WE DO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION. AS FAR AS CITY ENFORCEMENT RIGHTS, THIS IS JUST STATING THAT WE HAVE THE RIGHTS TO ENFORCE OUR RULES AT OUR PARKS. YOU KNOW, PER OUR EXISTING MUNICIPAL CODE, PER EXISTING LAWS, AND WITH THE INDIVIDUAL RESTRICTIONS AND LEAGUE CONSEQUENCES, THIS IS WHERE WE GET INTO WHEN WE HAVE REOCCURRING EVENTS. SO VIOLATIONS ARE REOCCURRING, SERIOUS OR UNRESOLVED. THE CITY COULD RESTRICT THE VIOLATOR FROM ACCESSING CITY PARKS OR FACILITIES FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE SPORTS LEAGUE SEASON. AND THOSE VIOLATIONS ARE GENERALLY ISSUED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE. AND IF VIOLATIONS ARE REPEATED, SERIOUS OR INVOLVE VIOLENCE OR THREATS OF VIOLENCE, PUBLIC INTOXICATION OR DISORDERLY CONDUCT, AND WE CAN SHOW THAT [00:55:06] THE SPORTS LEAGUES HAVE FAILED TO TAKE REASONABLE CORRECTIVE MEASURES, THEN THE CITY COULD IMPOSE PERMANENT RELATED REMEDIES AGAINST THE SPORTS LEAGUES, WHICH COULD INCLUDE A SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF FACILITY ACCESS. BUT WE HAVE VERY GOOD SPORTS LEAGUE PARTNERS. WE DON'T ANTICIPATE THAT WE WOULD EVER HAVE TO TAKE IT THAT FAR. AND THEN A DISCLAIMER AT THE END THAT THERE IS NO LIMITATION ON THE CITY AUTHORITY. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION LIMITS THE CITY'S AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE OUR MUNICIPAL CODE OR EXERCISE ITS POLICE POWERS. THE SECOND ITEM THAT WE'RE GOING TO DISCUSS TONIGHT. SO THERE ARE TWO ACTIONS WE'RE GOING TO TAKE WITH THIS STAFF REPORT. THE EXISTING MOU. WE HAVE DECIDED WE DO NOT WANT TO CHANGE ANY OF THE WORDING RELATIVE TO PERMIT USE FEES. SO THIS WORDING THAT IS IN HERE IN SECTION SEVEN REGARDING PERMIT USE FEES, THIS HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE LEAGUES AND HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR THE PAST DECADE. SO IT DOES STATE THAT THE SPORTS LEAGUES MUST PAY THE APPROVED USER FEES FOR THEIR USE OF CITY FACILITIES. AROUND 2021, THE COUNCIL DID VOTE TO ELIMINATE THOSE FEES. SO FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS, THE LEAGUES HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING FIELD USE FEES. AND PRIOR TO THAT, IT HAD BEEN THE CASE WHERE THE CITY COUNCIL HAD WAIVED 50% OF THE FEES. SO PRIOR TO THAT, THE LEAGUES HAVE BEEN PAYING, HAD BEEN PAYING 50% OF THE FIELD USE FEES. GOT REDUCED RIGHT AFTER COVID, RIGHT? YES. IN THOSE YEARS. YEAH. SO RIGHT AFTER COVID, BECAUSE OF THE THE HEAVY REDUCTION IN USAGE, WE DID AGREE TO REDUCE THE FEES DOWN TO ZERO. AND THAT HAS BEEN IN EFFECT SINCE THEN. OUR PREVIOUS PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DID MAKE REQUESTS A COUPLE TIMES TO REINSTATE THOSE BACK TO 50%, AND CITY COUNCIL AFFIRMED BOTH TIMES TO LEAVE THOSE AT ZERO AT THAT TIME. SO THE RATE WOULD BE BASED ON THE STAFF REPORT. IT'D BE EIGHT HOURS PER HOUR AND THEN $18 PER HOUR FOR THE LIGHTS IF IT'S AFTER SUNDOWN. IF THAT WAS THE FULL RATE, THAT'S THE FULL RATE, RIGHT? SO THAT'S THE FULL RATE. SO YOU'RE RECOMMENDING THE FULL RATE RIGHT IN YOUR PRESENT. NO. IN THE IN THE STAFF REPORT, WE ACTUALLY RECOMMENDED TO BRING IT BACK TO THE 50%. OKAY. OKAY. JUST SO WE DON'T TAKE SUCH A LARGE JUMP TO GO FROM ZERO. AND I DO HAVE KIND OF A. THE NEXT SLIDE HERE EXPLAINS, YOU KNOW, WHAT? THAT COST HAS ACTUALLY BEEN. SO IF WE WERE TO CHARGE THE FULL RATE, THAT WOULD COUNT FOR ABOUT $200,000 PER YEAR IN TOTAL FEES AMONG THE FOUR SPORTS LEAGUES. JUST TO BE CLEAR, THE SPORTS THIS MOU IS WITH ALL FOUR SPORTS LEAGUES. IT'S NOT JUST THE SOCCER LEAGUES. SO IT DOES INCLUDE THE BASEBALL AND THE FOOTBALL AS WELL. AND IN PREVIOUS YEARS, WHEN WE HAD THE 50% REDUCTION, WE WERE COLLECTING ABOUT $100,000 A YEAR IN TOTAL FEES FROM THE SPORTS LEAGUES. AND THAT CAME OUT TO ABOUT 4000 A YEAR. THAT WAS COLLECTED FOR THE SOCCER FIELD. USE 30,000 AT THE SOCCER FIELD USE, AND ABOUT 10,000 FOR THE FOOTBALL AND 20,000 FOR BASEBALL. THEY CAN ADJUST THOSE NUMBERS BECAUSE IT IS SIGNIFICANTLY MORE EXPENSIVE TO PLAY AT NIGHT, SO THEY CAN ADJUST THEIR SCHEDULES AND HELP BRING THOSE COSTS DOWN BY JUST SCHEDULING MORE GAMES IN THE DAY. BECAUSE WE DO CHARGE MORE FOR THE GAMES AT NIGHT. WE ALSO DID AN EVALUATION OF WHAT IT COSTS THE CITY TO OWN AND MAINTAIN ALL THESE SPORTS FIELDS. WHAT DOES IT COST US TO TO DO THE RESEEDING, TO DO THE MOWING, TO HAVE THESE SPORTS LIGHTS. WE ALSO PROVIDE FREE SNACK BARS. WE PROVIDE REFRIGERATORS AND ICE MAKERS IN THE SNACK BARS FOR ALL THE LEAGUES. SO IT IS, YOU KNOW, A HEALTHY ANNUAL COST THAT THE CITY PAYS JUST TO OWN AND OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THESE FIELDS. AND IT WHEN WE DID THAT EVALUATION, IT'S ABOUT $1.1 MILLION THAT THE CITY PAYS. SO IF WE WERE TO REESTABLISH THE FIELD USE FEES AT THE 50%, YOU'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT, YOU KNOW, A 10% CONTRIBUTION FROM THOSE LEAGUES RELATIVE TO THE COST THAT THE CITY PUTS IN TO OWNING AND MAINTAINING THESE FACILITIES. AND THEN HERE, I ALREADY MENTIONED THIS, YOU KNOW, SINCE THE 2122 SEASON, WE HAVE BEEN WAIVING THE FEES COMPLETELY. SO IN THAT FIVE YEAR PERIOD THAT WE'VE BEEN WAVING, THAT'S ABOUT A MILLION TOTAL DOLLARS IN FEES HAVE BEEN WAIVED TO THE BENEFIT OF OUR SPORTS LEAGUE PARTNERS. AND IF YOU CALCULATE THAT BASED OFF OF THE 50% THAT HAD TRADITIONALLY ALWAYS BEEN COLLECTED, THAT'S ABOUT $500,000 IN TOTAL FEES THAT WE'VE WAIVED FOR SPORTS LEAGUE PARTNERS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS. SO LOOKING AT THE [01:00:04] STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, WE ARE ASKING THAT WE APPROVE THE 14TH AMENDED MOU. THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE IT, WITH THE FIELD ALLOCATIONS BEING AS WAS SUBMITTED, WHICH IS CSA WOULD HAVE ALL OF THE FIELDS AT BAGUMA AND CVSL WOULD HAVE ALL OF THE FIELDS AT LOS FLORES. BUT DURING THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, OBVIOUSLY THERE WAS DISCUSSION ABOUT FAIRNESS BECAUSE THERE ARE MORE FIELDS AT BAGUMA. SO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY OTHER CORRECTIONS TO ANY OTHER PORTIONS OF THE MOU. BUT AGAIN, THEY DID RECOMMEND THAT FIELD THREE REMAIN AS IT HAS BEEN FOR THE PAST FOUR YEARS AND BE ALLOCATED TO CVSL. SO THAT WOULD BE THE THE SECOND ALTERNATIVE. WHEN WE LOOK AT ALTERNATIVES FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, WE COULD MAKE THE SECOND ALTERNATIVE. IF WE DID WANT TO HAVE FIELD C THREE AT BAGUMA REMAIN WITH CVSL, THEN WE WOULD BE RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT AND RESTATED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE ALLOCATIONS AS MODIFIED PER THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION. AND THEN OBVIOUSLY OTHER ALTERNATIVES INCLUDE TO MAKE ADDITIONAL EDITS IF NEEDED. IF WE DO NOT TAKE ANY ACTION ON THE MOU, THEN THE EXISTING 13TH AMENDED MOU WOULD GO BACK INTO EFFECT, WHICH WOULD HAVE THE SAME FIELD ALLOCATION THAT PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION WOULD BE SEEKING ANYWAY. BUT IF WE DID THAT, THAT ALSO MEANS WE WOULD NOT GET THE ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE THAT WE ARE SEEKING FOR THE GENERAL LIABILITY AND THE RULES AND REGULATION ENHANCEMENTS. AND THEN FOR THE SECOND ACTION THAT WE WANTED TO TAKE TONIGHT, THIS IS REGARDING SECTION SEVEN. AGAIN, THE RECOMMENDATION IS THAT WE DO NOT MODIFY SECTION SEVEN. WE LEAVE THE LANGUAGE AS IS, WHICH DOES REQUIRE THE PAYMENT OF THE FIELD USE FEES. AND THAT ALLOWS EACH CITY COUNCIL EACH YEAR TO VOTE ON WHETHER OR NOT TO WAIVE FEES IN THEIR ENTIRETY OR WAIVE FEES, YOU KNOW, AT 50%. AND THAT WAY, AS WE MOVE FORWARD, THAT CAN BE BASED OFF OF THE CURRENT ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN ANY GIVEN YEAR. SO WE DO ENCOURAGE OUR SPORTS LEAGUES TO COME FORWARD AND AND REQUEST THAT WAIVER IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT THEY DESIRE, BUT WITHOUT ACTUALLY CODIFYING IN THE MOU A REDUCTION IN RATES SO THAT THE COUNCIL HAS THAT OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE THAT DECISION ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, IF THOSE WANT TO BE WAIVED FOR THIS GIVEN YEAR, SINCE THE FEES HAVE BEEN AT ZERO FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS, THE STAFF WOULD BE RECOMMENDING THAT WE REAFFIRM THE LANGUAGE IN SECTION SEVEN AND THAT WE SET THE FIELD USE COLLECTION RATE AT 50% AGAIN FOR THIS COMING YEAR. AND THEN OBVIOUSLY ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE TO REDUCE THE FEES, THE FULL 100% AGAIN, OR ANY OTHER REDUCTION THAT CITY COUNCIL SEES FIT. OKAY. ANY COMMENTS ON CITY COUNCIL ON THE PRESENTATION? YES, I HAVE A QUESTION. JUST FOR CLARIFICATION. WE ARE GOING TO CHARGE THE FEES TO THE SPORTS LEAGUES, NOT THE PLAYERS, NOT THE TEAMS, BECAUSE THE SPORTS LEAGUES, YOU KNOW, THEY CHARGE A REGISTRATION FEE AND THEN THE TEAM REGISTRATION FEE. SO IT'S NOT IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PLAYERS AND WITH THE TEAMS. IT'S DIRECTLY TO THE SPORTS LEAGUES. THAT IS CORRECT. IT'S DIRECTLY TO SPORTS LEAGUES. THANK YOU. SO AT YOU KNOW, AT A 50% RATE, THAT'S $4 PER HOUR FOR A GAME, RIGHT? SO IF YOU HAVE 20 KIDS OUT THERE PLAYING AND THEY, IF EVEN IF THEY TRANSFER THAT FEE TO THE PLAYERS, YOU'RE TALKING $0.20 PER PLAYER PER GAME, MAYBE. AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT FEES. WE JUST SIGNED A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, YOU KNOW, WITH THREE DIFFERENT COMPANIES FOR DIFFERENT COMPANIES THAT TOTAL 877,650. AND THAT IS ALSO PART OF THE EXPENSES TO THE CITY. IT'S ALSO TO TAKE THAT IN CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I'M GOING TO OPEN PUBLIC COMMENTS AT 701. ROSA. OKAY. BUENAS TARDES. MI NOMBRE ES ALMA. SABES SOY LE PRÉSIDENT DE LA LIGA. COACHELLA YOUTH SPORT [01:05:04] ASSOCIATION, COACHELLA. ESTE ES CANADA QUISIERA FELICITO A CITY MANAGER POR POR ESTAR POR PARTE DEL MIEMBRO DEL CONSIGLIO FELICIDADES Y BIENVENIDO HONORABLE ALCALDE MIEMBRO DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL DE COACHELLA SOLICITA RESPETO CONSIDER REGRESAR EL CAMPO DEL PARQUE DE SEASON FOUR. MUCHOS ANOS TRABAJADO JUNTO CON LA COMUNIDAD DE COACHELLA OFRECIENDO ACTIVIDADES DEPORTIVAS PARA CIENTOS DE NINOS Y JOVENES. NUESTRO PROPOSITO SIEMPRE SIDO UN ESPACIO SEGURO DONDE PUEDEN DESARROLLARSE MANTENERSE ACTIVOS Y APRENDER VALORES COMO DISCIPLINA RESPECTO TRABAJO EN VIVO DESDE EL ACCESO AL CAMPO TRES NUESTRA CAPACIDAD PARA LA COMUNIDAD SE HA VISTO LIMITADA HEMOS TENIDO COMPARTIR ESPACIOS CON CATEGORIAS INFANTILES REDUCIENDO LA CANTIDAD DE ENTRENAMIENTOS Y JUEGOS. QUÉ PODEMOS PROGRAMAR COMO CONSECUENCIA TENEMOS MENOS OPORTUNIDADES PARA NINOS PARTICIPAN EN NUESTRO NUESTROS PROGRAMAS. ESTAMOS SOLICITANDO. BENEFICIO BENEFICIO PARA UNA ORGANIZACION SIN UNA OPORTUNIDAD PARA MEJORAR LOS JOVENES DE NUESTRA CIUDAD RECUPERAR EL CAMPO PERMITIRA OFRECER MAS ENTRENAMIENTO MAS PARTIDOS MAS EQUIPOS Y LA PARTICIPACION DE NINOS FAMILIAS DE COACHELLA. ADEMAS, HEMOS OBSERVADO EL CAMPO SIN USO ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS PARTICULARMENTE LOS DOMINGOS MIENTRAS EXISTE UNA NECESIDAD REAL DE ESPACIO PARA PROGRAMAR JUVENILES RESULTA DIFICIL ENTENDER POR QUÉ RECURSO PUBLICO PERMANECE DISPONIBLE SIN BENEFICIAR A LOS NINOS DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD DURANTE MAS DE UNA DÉCADA DEMOSTRADO SER UN ORGANIZACION RESPONSIBLY COMPROMETIDA EN LA JUVENTUD DE COACHELLA. NUNCA HABIAMOS ENFRENTADO UNA SITUACION COMO ESTA SIEMPRE EN LOS TRABAJADORES DE MANERA POSITIVA CON LA CIUDAD PARA PROTEGER EL DEPORTE NUESTROS JOVENES RESPECTO A LAS CONSIDERAN DEVOLVER EL CAMPO TRES O ENCONTRAR UNA SOLUCION DE ESTE ESPACIO SE UTILIZADO PARA LAS OPORTUNIDADES DEPORTIVAS PARA LOS NINOS DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD. JOVENES EN EL FUTURO DE COACHELLA. ESTO ESTO ES BASADO A ESTA PASANDO EL CAMPO THREE ES ESTE DE TODO ESTE CONSIDERACIONES DEL CAMPO. TRES HEMOS LO HEMOS ESTADO JUSTAMENTE A ULTIMA HORA DE LA OPORTUNIDAD DE HABLAR. PORQUE LO NECESITAMOS GRACIAS. LORETTA PEREZ. GOOD EVENING. I'M LORETTA PEREZ. I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS THAT I DID NOT SEE ON THERE. THERE ARE NO ADAPTIVE SPORTS AND SOCCER HERE IN THE COACHELLA. THERE ARE NO. WE HAVE TO GO ALL THE WAY TO LA QUINTA OR PALM DESERT IN ORDER TO GET INTO THAT SOCCER LEAGUE. IF WE HAVE CHILDREN ON THE SPECTRUM OR CHILDREN WHO ARE SPECIAL NEEDS. I DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING IN THE MOU THAT HAS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE SOCCER LEAGUES DO NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST IT. I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE PLACED IN THAT BEFORE APPROVAL, BECAUSE WE NEED TO NOT ONLY PROTECT OUR CHILDREN, BUT PROTECT OUR CITY FROM ANY KIND OF LAWSUITS AND PROTECT ALMA FROM ANY KIND OF THINGS LIKE THAT. I THINK THAT THE 50%, I UNDERSTAND WHY I GET IT, BUT THE FEES THAT I'VE BEEN HEARING FROM PARENTS THAT HAVE CHILDREN ARE IN THE SOCCER LEAGUE. THEY VARY. SO THEY GO FROM $45 FLAT FEE, THEN $45 PER TEAM, THEN $45 PER SOCCER FIELD FROM OF THE PARK'S DIFFERENT PARKS. SO MY QUESTION TO YOU IS, HOW ARE WE REGULATING THESE FEES, AND HOW ARE WE GOING TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR CHILDREN AND OUR FAMILIES, BECAUSE THESE FAMILIES, THESE GENERATIONS, GENERATIONS PLAY AND WE NEED TO REGULATE HOW THAT HAPPENS AND IF WE CAN DO SO? I ALSO THINK THAT ON TOP OF THAT, THE FIELD USAGE AND 50%, IT JUST IT MAKES SENSE. I DO UNDERSTAND THAT. I DO UNDERSTAND WHY THEY BROUGHT THAT FORWARD BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, IT IS OVER USAGE. AND I THINK AS SOMEONE WITH CHILDREN WHO WANT TO PLAY AND ARE ON THE SPECTRUM, THAT IT WOULDN'T BE TOO MUCH TO ASK $0.20 PER KID. THERE ARE MANY QUESTIONS THAT I [01:10:06] HAVE, AND I THINK THAT IT NEEDS TO BE REGULATED TO PROTECT THE CHILDREN. WE DO HAVE. WE ARE WORKING WITH A NONPROFIT CALLED GEAR IT FORWARD, AND THEY DO HELP COVER THE FEES, AND I'M TRYING TO GET THEM A NUMBER FOR OUR CITY. AND I JUST GET DIFFERENT ANSWERS. SO TRYING TO COVER EVERYTHING, INCLUDING EQUIPMENT, WE WOULD LOVE TO, TO BE ABLE TO GIVE THEM AN ANSWER OF WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO RAISE WHEN WE'RE DOING OUR AUTISM WALKS AND WHY WE'RE TRYING TO RAISE IT. AND SO HAVING IT WRITTEN DOWN AND ESTABLISHED WOULD BE A REALLY GOOD THING FOR THE FAMILIES THAT ARE REALLY WANTING TO BE PART OF THIS. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. NEXT SPEAKER, ROGELIO MEJIA. CAN WE HAVE YOU? YES, COME. YOU CAN GIVE IT TO HER AND SHE'LL COME TO US. NO WORRIES. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS ROGELIO MEJIA. I AM THE TEAM ADMIN FOR A LOCAL YOUTH GIRLS SOCCER TEAM. WITH THAT IN MIND, I DO WANT TO SAY THAT SPORTS DO REPRESENT HONESTY, RESPECT, AND KEEPING COMMITMENTS. WHEN THESE VALUES ARE NOT UPHELD, EVERYONE LOSES. WITH THAT IN MIND, I DO WANT TO DISCLOSE TO YOU GUYS THAT WE PARTICIPATED IN A TOURNAMENT THAT WAS HELD JANUARY 24TH AND 25TH. THE TOURNAMENT WAS ADVERTISED BY THE LOCAL LEAGUE. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE FLIERS THAT ARE PASSED OUT, WE. WE PAID A TOTAL OF $740, WHICH CAME FROM FUNDS THAT THE TEAM WORKED REALLY HARD TO RAISE FROM THE BEGINNING. THE ADVERTISED PRICE FOR THE CHAMPION. THE CHAMPIONSHIP TEAM WAS A FREE ENTRY INTO THE COPA ALIANZA 2026 LOS ANGELES. PLEASE DO KEEP IN MIND WHEN WE PARTICIPATE IN TOURNAMENTS, NOT ONLY DOES THIS INVOLVE US INVESTING OUR TIME, BUT ALSO MONEY AND THE EFFORT TO COMPETE ALONG WITH THE PARENT SUPPORT. BEING THAT THE TOURNAMENT WAS HANDLED ON LOCAL FIELDS BY THE LOCAL LEAGUE, WE BELIEVED THAT THERE WAS A RELIABLE AND WELL ORGANIZED ORGANIZATION SUPPORTING THE EVENT. HOWEVER, AFTER WINNING THE SAID PRIZE, WE WERE NEVER AWARDED. I HAVE ATTEMPTED TO RESOLVE THE MATTER SINCE APRIL 5TH AND HAVE BEEN BOUNCED AROUND INSTEAD OF BEING OFFERED A SOLUTION. AT SOME POINT, I DID CONTACT ONE OF THE REPRESENTATIVES, RICARDO VALENCIA, AND ASKED HIM TO PLEASE HELP RESOLVE THE MATTER. OTHERWISE, I WOULD CONTACT ALMA MYSELF. RICARDO LAUGH AND STATED THAT SHE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE EVENT, WHICH LED ME WONDERING AS TO WHY CISA WOULD HAVE THEIR LOGO ON A FLIER. I ALSO MESSAGED HER AND I NEVER GOT A RESPONSE FROM HER, WHICH ALSO LED ME TO BELIEVE THAT MAYBE THIS TOURNAMENT WAS NOT AUTHORIZED AND THE APPROPRIATE CITY PERMITS MAY MAY HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED. THIS IS NOT ONLY ABOUT THE MONETARY VALUE OF THE PRICE, IT'S ABOUT TRUST. WHEN AN ORGANIZATION ADVERTISES A PRICE TO ENCOURAGE TEAMS TO PARTICIPATE, THE COMMITMENT SHOULD BE HONORED. OTHERWISE, CREDIBILITY IS LOST. THE TRUST OF PLAYERS, COACHES, FAMILIES AND SPONSORS WHO SUPPORT THE SPORT IS DAMAGED. HELPING THE COMMUNITY IS NOT JUST ABOUT ORGANIZING EVENTS, IT'S ABOUT FULFILLING PROMISES AND STANDING BY THE COMMITMENTS. ALL WE ARE ASKING FOR IS TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY. IF THERE WAS A PROBLEM THAT PREVENTED THE PRIZE FROM BEING AWARDED, THE PARTICIPATING TEAM DESERVED A CLEAR EXPLANATION AND A FAIR RESOLUTION, WHICH WAS NOT OFFERED TO US. AND THAT'S WHY I'M HERE TODAY AND HOPING TO ACCOMPLISH. I HOPE THAT THIS SITUATION CAN BE RESOLVED RESPECTFULLY AND THE FUTURE TOURNAMENTS BE BETTER ORGANIZED, WITH THE SAME COMMITMENT EXPECTED FROM PLAYERS ON THE FIELD. PLAY FAIR, RESPECT THE RULES AND KEEP YOUR WORD WITH THAT IN MIND. ON A SIDE NOTE, CESAR BEING OFFERED MORE FIELDS THAN CVS SELL. I FEEL IN THE PROPOSED FIVE YEAR TERM CREATES AN IMBALANCE. IT UNDERMINES THE GOAL OF PROVIDING FAIR AND EQUAL RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. FABIAN BRICENO. HELLO. MY NAME IS FABIAN BRICENO. I AM A COACH FOR A U13 BOYS TEAM. WE ARE UNDERSTANDING THAT FIELDS ARE GOING TO BE TAKEN FROM US RIGHT NOW. WE HAVE A HARD TIME PRACTICING. OUR PLAYERS FOR TOURNAMENTS THAT WE GO REPRESENT THE CITY OF COACHELLA. SO WE ARE SEVEN, SIX ZERO, WHICH IS OUR AREA CODE. HERE WE GO ALL OVER THE, YOU KNOW, HEMET, TEMECULA, RIVERSIDE, REPRESENTING COACHELLA. NOW WE'RE LOSING FIELDS IN ORDER TO GIVE THEM TO CISA. A LOT OF MY BOYS PLAY THERE. A LOT OF MY BOYS PLAY IN BOTH LEAGUES. WE HAVE NO PROBLEMS. WE JUST WANT FIELDS TO PRACTICE. WE ARE HAVING TO GO PRACTICE IN INDIO, WHERE COACHELLA TEAMS. EXCUSE ME, WE'RE PRACTICING IN INDIO, HAVING TO FIGHT WITH TEAMS OVER THERE FROM INDIO. YOU KNOW, JUST TRYING. ALL WE NEED IS A [01:15:04] PIECE OF GRASS TO PRACTICE. NOW WE'RE LOSING FIELDS OVER HERE. WE JUST FOUND OUT, YOU KNOW, WE MIGHT NOT EVEN HAVE AVENUE 53. SO THAT WAS ANOTHER FIELD THAT WE'RE LOSING. SO MY THING IS MAYBE GIVE THEM BACK FIELD THREE GIVE US FIELD FOR ITS SEPARATE IF THAT'S YOU KNOW, I BELIEVE IT'S FAIR. WE HAVE THREE FIELDS. THEY HAVE TONS OF ROOM. WE'RE HAVING TO MAKE ONE FIELD. WE DO ABOUT 2 OR 3 FIELDS OUT OF ONE FIELD SO WE CAN GET OUR LITTLE ONES IN. WE GOT YOUNG GIRLS. WE'RE ACTUALLY HAVING GIRL TEAMS. YOU GO TO SEESAW, YOU PLAY BOYS AND GIRLS. IT'S NOT FAIR TO OUR GIRLS. SO AND THAT BEING SAID, YOU KNOW, FOR US TO HAVE TO GO TO INDIO, YOU KNOW, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TAKING PARKS AWAY, TAKING FIELDS AWAY. LET'S GET MORE FIELDS. YOU KNOW, IT'S WHAT WE NEED IS MORE FIELDS. WE WANT TO TAKE OUR KIDS AWAY FROM IPADS, AWAY FROM ALL THE ELECTRONICS, GET THEM OUT. YOU KNOW, THAT WAY THEY'RE NOT INSIDE COOPED UP IN VIDEO GAMES. WE NEED MORE FIELDS. NOT JUST FOR THEM, FOR US, FOR EVERYBODY. WE NEED FIELDS FOR THE KIDS. SO THIS IS ALL GOING, YOU KNOW, THE WRONG WAY. WE'RE FORGETTING ABOUT THE KIDS. YOU KNOW, IT'S ALL ABOUT THE KIDS, THE YOUTH GETTING THEM OUT THERE. I GREW UP HERE 47 YEARS HERE. YOU KNOW, THIS IS WHERE I GREW UP. I GREW UP PLAYING BASEBALL. NOW I'M A SOCCER COACH. WE'RE LICENSED EVERYTHING YOU KNOW, YOU ASK FOR IT, WE GOT IT. LICENSES, WHATEVER. WE'RE TRYING TO EXPAND. WE HAVE OUR ALL OF OUR YOUTH IS HAVING TO GO TO RIVERSIDE, LA AREA BECAUSE WE'RE NOT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S NOWHERE TO PRACTICE HERE, NOWHERE TO PLAY. SO LET'S KEEP OUR YOUTH HERE IN THE VALLEY INSTEAD OF HAVING THEM GO TO RIVERSIDE TO GO COMPETE. WHEN WE HAVE THE TALENT HERE, WE'RE LOSING TALENT FROM COACHELLA. SO I BELIEVE YOU KNOW, WHAT'S FAIR IS FAIR. WE HAVE A SMALL RANCHO LAS FLORES. IT'S REALLY SMALL. THREE FIELDS TAKEN AWAY. ANOTHER FIELD FROM US IS IT'S GOING TO HURT ME. I PRACTICE AT FIELD THREE TUESDAYS AND THURSDAYS. THAT'S WHERE I PRACTICE. THAT'S MY PRACTICE FIELD. THANK YOU GUYS SO MUCH. APPRECIATE IT. ANTONIO JUAREZ. HELLO, MY NAME IS ANTONIO JUAREZ AND I THINK FIELD THREE NEEDS TO STAY WITH CVSL. MY GIRLS PRACTICE OVER THERE. I'M ONE OF THE COACHES THAT HAS THE GIRLS TEAM. WE STARTED OFF WITH TWO TEAMS. I THINK THERE'S LIKE SIX NOW AND THAT'S WHERE WE'RE AIMING TO TO PUT THEM AWAY FROM THE BOYS. IT'S, YOU KNOW, TYPE OF AN EXPANSION TO INCLUDE EVERYBODY. THE GIRLS ARE TRAVELING. THEY'RE THEY'RE PRACTICING HARD. I JUST DON'T SEE THAT IT'S RIGHT TO TAKE AWAY A FIELD WHEN YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S BEING USED. YOU CAN GO OVER THERE AND YOU CAN SEE ON THOSE DAYS WE'RE PRACTICING THE FIELDS FIELD. AND THEN AS FAR AS FEES GO, I MEAN, I THINK I FEEL LIKE IT'S THE WRONG TIME. IT'S EVERYBODY'S FEELING THE PINCH OF THE DOLLAR RIGHT NOW. MAYBE PUSH THAT OFF A LITTLE A YEAR FROM NOW. I DON'T KNOW, IT JUST SEEMS LIKE A, A JUST SQUEEZING RIGHT NOW WHEN EVERYBODY'S JUST BARELY TRYING TO MAKE THE, THE REGISTRATION FEES. AND THAT'S, THAT'S ABOUT IT. THAT'S MY TIME. THANK YOU. IS SANCHEZ THERE IS STILL SEATING UP HERE FOR THOSE SITTING IN THE BACK ALLEY WAY OVER THERE. THERE IS SEATING UP HERE. IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO COME AND SIT DOWN. AND SOME OF THE OPEN SEATS UP HERE IN THE FRONT. BUENAS TARDES. MI NOMBRE ES SANCHEZ. VENGO POR PARTE DE ESTADOS. MUCHOS ANOS CON HABLAR POR PARTE DE Y TAMBIÉN POR LOS NINOS. ESTAMOS PIDIENDO EL CAMPO TRES DE REGRESO PORQUE SE INJUSTO EL CAMPO OCUPADO COMO LA SENORA ALMA MUCHO TIEMPO ESTA OCUPADO SENORES PIDIENDO ENTRENAR PARA LOS NINOS. QUÉ BUENO? QUÉ ES EL CAMPO TRES POR UNA LIGA DE FUTBOL. SIETE LOS MIÉRCOLES DE ADULTOS Y TAMBIÉN POR UN CLUB COBRAN. ENTONCES TENGAN CONSIDERACION TODO ESO SI VAN A ENTRENAR LOS NINOS CONTIENEN LOS NINOS HAY NINGUN PROBLEMA PARA ESO SON LOS PARQUES PUBLICOS NO PARA SER DINERO CON LO TANTO LA CIUDAD DE COACHELLA POR ENTRENAR VERDAD. ENTONCES ESO ES UNA PARTE LA OTRA PUES LO CONSIDERAMOS POR QUÉ SON BASTANTES EQUIPOS EN LA LIGA SUIZA ES BASTANTE LA GENTE JUGAR AHI AHI PUEDEN MIRAR IN COACHELLA. YO ASSOCIATION EN LA PAGINA DE GOOGLE SE GOOGLE TODAS LA CANTIDAD DE EQUIPOS. QUÉ ES PORQUE MUCHAS VECES A [01:20:02] DECIMOS Q TENEMOS LA CANTIDAD DE JUGADORES. SI NO ES CIERTO. ENTONCES ESTO DE SER MAS PUBLICO DE LA LIGA DE FUTBOL DE BASEBALL DE FUTBOL AMERICANO PUBLICO PARA TODOS PARA QUÉ LA GENTE SE DE CUENTA CUANTAS PERSONAS ESTAMOS DESCRITAS EN LA LIGA Y AHI ESTA CUANTO SE COBRA EN CADA LIGA? YO SOY DE LOS Q. ESTOY EN CONTRA DE Q DE TENER LA EL PODER PARA LOS NINOS JUEGAN GRATIS, PERO A VECES LA LIGA DE FUTBOL O DE FUTBOL TIENEN GASTOS ORGANIZATION TIENEN GASTOS DE ADMINISTRACION TRABAJA PARA LAS VEGAS Y NO LO HACEN EL TRABAJO GRATIS FUERA GRATIS, PERO SI TOMO CONSIDERACION TODO ESO SI EL CAMPO TRES PARA LOS NINOS PARA LOS NINOS. VERDAD NO PARA Q HAYA OTRAS VUELTAS AHI JUGANDO FUTBOL Y PARA QUÉ HAYA CLUBES ENTRENANDO A LA GENTE POR ENTRENAR CADA VEZ. GRACIAS, SENOR. THANK YOU. GRACIAS. GRACIAS. RICARDO VALENCIA. HELLO. MY NAME IS RICARDO VALENCIA. I WANT TO TALK ABOUT A FEW THINGS. THE FIRST MEETING THAT WE HAD HERE WERE PARKS AND RECS WITH COMMISSIONER AVILA A WHILE BACK. EVERYBODY HERE TO MY LEFT FROM CVS WEREN'T HERE IN THAT MEETING. THEY VOTED, AND THEY DECIDED THAT THEY WERE GOING TO GIVE FIELDS RANCHO LAS FLORES TO ONE LEAGUE, PICK THEM UP TO THE OTHER. AND ANDREW WAS AT THAT MEETING HERE WHEN THE OTHER LEAGUE FOUND THAT OUT. THAT'S WHEN THEY HAD TIME. THAT'S WHEN THEY ACTUALLY CARED ABOUT COMING HERE TALKING TO YOU GUYS. BUT WHEN IT WAS OUT THERE, NOBODY CARED. NOW THAT THE WORD'S OUT THAT WE'RE GOING TO GET THE FIELD THREE, NOW, THEY CARE ABOUT IT. BUT WHEN WE WERE HERE MONTHS AGO FIGHTING FOR THAT, THEY DIDN'T CARE. WHY DO THEY CARE NOW? ANOTHER THING. COMMISSIONER AVILA WAS THE ONE WHO VOTED IN FAVOR OF HAVING ONE LEAGUE ON EACH FIELD. THEN WHEN THEY DID THE NEXT MEETING, COMMISSIONER AVILA DECIDED THAT HE HAD CHANGED HIS MIND. THEY KNOW THAT HE DIDN'T THINK IT WAS FAIR. COMMISSIONER AVILA HAS HIS SON PLAYING IN A CLUB IN SOUTH. IF I DON'T, I'M NOT MISTAKEN. VICTOR ALCANTARA WAS REMOVED FROM THERE BECAUSE YOU GUYS SAID THAT THAT WASN'T, YOU KNOW, RIGHT. THAT HE HAD A TEAM IN SEESAW, SO HIS VOTE SHOULDN'T COUNT. SO I DON'T THINK COMMISSIONER AVILA SHOULD COUNT, WHICH WAS FOUR VOTES. AND IT WAS A TIE. SO I THINK YOU GUYS SHOULD DECIDE ON WHO GETS FIELD THREE AND WHO DOESN'T. ANOTHER THING, ROGELIO SPOKE ABOUT A TOURNAMENT HERE AT DUMA. I WISH EVERY OTHER TEAM THAT WENT TO THE TOURNAMENT WOULD SAY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT SHE SAID. WHEN YOU GO TO A TOURNAMENT, YOU KNOW THERE'S RULES AND REGULATIONS. I WAS IN CHARGE HERE IN COACHELLA. I WASN'T BECAUSE SHE ASKED ME AS DIRECTOR OF TOURNAMENTS, ROGELIO THOUGHT THAT IT WAS FAIR FOR HER TO GO TO SOMEONE HIGHER THAN ME. ACCORDING TO HER, SHE DIDN'T GO ON THE SINA COMMAND TO COME TO ME FIRST. HE WENT TO THE ORGANIZER OF THE TOURNAMENT. THE TOURNAMENT ORGANIZER TOLD HER, GO TO EDGAR. DID SHE EVER GO TO EDGAR? NO. HOW DID WE FIND OUT? THREE DAYS BEFORE THE TOURNAMENT. SHE CALLS ME AND SHE TELLS ME, YOU KNOW WHAT? WHAT WE WANT, YOU KNOW, IS NOT BEING AUTHORIZED TO US. WHY? BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T A DIVISION FOR THEM TO PLAY. SO I SAID, LET ME SEE WHAT I CAN DO. THAT WAS ONLY THREE DAYS BEFORE THE TOURNAMENT, BUT ON THREE DAYS BEFORE THE TOURNAMENT. SHORT NOTICE. WE ALREADY HAVE THE SCHEDULES. SO I SAID, LET ME TALK TO SOMEONE AND SEE WHAT WE COULD DO. I SAID, THE NEXT TOURNAMENT IN SALINAS, AND OF COURSE YOU'RE NOT GOING TO WANT TO GO OVER THERE. SHE SAID, NO, I DON'T WANT TO GO TO SALINAS. WHAT CAN I DO ABOUT IT? I TOLD HER, LET ME SEE WHAT I COULD DO. SHE SAID, ALL RIGHT, I'LL THINK ABOUT IT. WE NEVER DENIED ON GIVING HER HER HER AWARD. IT'S THERE NOW. SHE WANTS TO WAIT FOR NEXT YEAR AND HAVE IT. IT'LL BE THERE. JUST THINK ABOUT EVERYTHING YOU KNOW WE DO. WE'RE HERE WEEK AFTER WEEK, FIGHTING FOR WHAT WE WANT. AND ONLY WHEN THEY SEE THAT IT'S FOR REAL, THAT'S WHEN THEY SHOW UP. THAT'S WHEN THEY CARE. I DON'T THINK IT'S FAIR. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. MANUEL MONTANA. BUENAS TARDES. MI NOMBRE ES MANUEL MONTANO, PRESIDENT. DISCULPE ESCUCHADO. USTEDES PUEDEN FIJAR A MIRAR LAS FORMAS A PLANTAS DE LAS ALMAS. CUANDO NOS DIERON EL CAMPO NUMERO TRES DE ESTUVIMOS. DE ACUERDO. ENTONCES, ESTAMOS DE ACUERDO NO SE HIZO POR AQUI LAS COSAS SI HICIERON PLATICAS ESTUVIMOS ACUERDO LOS DOS TAMBIÉN EN LA ENTREGA MEDIA EL NUMERO TRES CUATRO DE LA CINCUENTA TAMBIÉN ES ESTA TODO POR ESCRITO. ENTONCES AQUI NO HAY MENTIRAS JORGE SANCHEZ AQUI ESTAN LOS EQUIPOS PRACTICAN LES COBRAS A LOS EQUIPOS SOBRE EL NINOS NINAS LES COBRAN TODAS LAS NINAS NO LES COBRAN NO ANDAN CON MENTIRAS SI ES DECIR VESSEL ESTA REGISTRADO CUALES SON LOS [01:25:05] PAPELES. YO LA TENGO LOS JUGADORES AHI SI LES PONGA ES CLARO CON USTEDES CLARO CON USTEDES MAS EL AGUA. DOI DOI A LA COMUNIDAD. MA PRACTICAN QUÉ MAS QUIEREN NO ESO PROBLEMAS VIENEN USTEDES ESOS PROBLEMAS USTEDES NO VENGAN AQUI A LES PRAKTIKEN NO LES COBRAS. LES DAMOS EL TIEMPO PRACTICAN TENEMOS UN EQUIPO DE PREMIER UN EQUIPO JUEGA UPSELL ES UNA DIVISION MAS ALTA. Y LOS TENEMOS AHI PRACTICANDO. QUÉ ES UN SELECCIONADOS LES DE RISA SON SELECCIONADOS DE POR ESO EL ESPACIO PRACTICAN EL RESPETO SE DEBE DE LA COMUNIDAD. NOSOTROS ESTAMOS ASPETTANDO LOS JUEGOS TODAVIA CON DOS GANANCIAS ESTAMOS RESPECTO A LA COMUNIDAD Q Y PRACTICAN NO LES QUITADO SU TIEMPO. SU ESPACIO. AHI ESTA TODA LA GENTE. PERO ESTO NO HABLA USTEDES CIENTOS DE NINOS DE CINCO DE TRES CUATRO CINCO SEIS ANOS EN OTRAS PARTES COBRAN CINCUENTA DOLARES NOSOTROS LOS TENEMOS GRATIS QUIEREN MAS IMPORTANTE PORQUE EN EL ANGULO IMPORTA PORQUE LO DE ESTADO REPITIENDO Y EL ANDREW NO NI GRACIAS HIJO ANDREW SECRECIONES QUÉ RANCHO LA FLORES PUEDE SER CUATRO CONCHAS NO TIENEN NO SE IMAGINA. CUANTO ES EL CAMPO REGLAMENTO PARA LAS CANAS DE FUTBOL. UNA CANCHA UNA CANCION DE FUTBOL PARA ESTO DE COSAS MAS IMPORTANTES A GENTE A GENTE USTEDES AYUDAR EL CALOR A GENTE NO TIENE COMER NO TIENEN PAPA LA LUZ LA SEGURIDAD. USTED ESTA POR ESTO. ES VERDAD YA A TRABAJAR YA ES HORA YA ES MOMENTUM A LA CARA YA. PERO USTED ESTA LA COMUNIDAD CASADOS CON UNA SOLA LIGA Y ES LA VERDAD. THANK YOU. NO. YOU ARE SEEING AGUILAR. AGUILAR RESPECTO A LA SENORA DE UNA COMO UNA LIGA PARA LOS NINOS CON SPECTRUM CAPACIDADES ESPECIALES. ESO CUALQUIERA DE LAS DOS ESTUVIERA MUY BIEN TRABAJAR PORQUE SI VERDAD NO EXISTE YO PERSONALMENTE ENTRENAR UN NINO PORTERA DE LA LIGA DE PERO MAS DE LA LIGA. ESTE DE CORAZON ENTRA EN UN NINO, PERO NO ES PORQUE LA VERDAD. PERO SI NO TENGO NO SOY PROFESIONAL NI NADA. PERO TENGO EL CORAZON DE MADRE Y YO CREO ESO ES MUY IMPORTANTE. QUÉ SE CONSIDERAN LOS DOS ALGUNOS FACTORES A CONSIDERAR AQUI. LLEGANDO DEL CAMPO TRES ES UN ENTENDIMIENTO EL CAMPO TRES PERTENECE A SISA DESPUÉS DE QUÉ SL. NO SÉ SI USTEDES VEN A LOS NUMEROS DE CADA LIGA. TODOS SABEMOS O SI CONSIDERACION. QUÉ SI SE FUE LA PRIMERA LIGA. QUÉ SE ESTA ESTABLECIDA. QUÉ NO SÉ SI TOMAN ESTE ANTIGÜEDAD. PERO POR LA PRIMERA LA PRIMERA LIGA ESTABLECIDO LOS NUMEROS DE SON MAS GRANDES PARKS. LA COMISION DECIDIDO REGRESAR AL CAMPO TRES POR ESO MISMO TAMBIÉN CONSIDERARON LOS EVENTOS DE LA COMUNIDAD. SE TOMAN EN EL BUDUMA. PUES OBVIAMENTE POR ESTE PERIODO DE TIEMPO. SI SE TIENE CURA PARA HACER DE LOS TORNEOS PARA PARA Q PUEDEN LLEVAR A CABO DE LA COMUNIDAD. VERDAD ENTONCES NO SÉ SI USTEDES TOMAN CONSIDERACION ESO ES UNA LIGA Q YA ESTABA AHI EL SENOR DICE. QUÉ ES? SE ESTA EXPANDED. NO TIENE MAS JUGADORES Y Q NECESITAN MAS CAMPOS. PERO COMO SE HACE UN POCO INJUSTO PORQUE ES ASI COMO TE PONERME YO PORQUE YO ESTOY VIENDO SI SE TAMBIÉN PUEDE SER MAS PUEDE PERO YO NO LO VEO PELEANDO LOS CAMPOS A INDIO PELEANDO LOS CAMPOS DE LA QUINTA O Q SI YO ENTONCES ALGO JUSTO PARA LAS DOS LIGAS Y PUES. SE MANTENGA COMO ESTABA ANTERIORMENTE CONSIDERADO Q Q SI SE LIGA MAS GRANDE Q LA OTRA VEZ ESTABA ESTABLECIDO HASTA Q EMPEZARON A PELEAR LOS DE LA OTRA LIGA PORQUE COMO LES DIGO ES COMO QUITATE TWO PONERME YO [01:30:02] PORQUE YO YA TRAIGO MAS SI PERO NOSOTROS YA ESTAMOS AQUI. ENTONCES NO SÉ CONSIDERACIONES PUES MUCHAS GRACIAS POR SU TIEMPO. THANK YOU. DAISY CASTANEDA. HI GUYS. SORRY I'M A LITTLE NERVOUS. THIS IS MY FIRST TIME DOING THIS. GOOD EVENING. I WANT TO THANK THE CITY FOR CONSIDERING ADAPTIVE SPORTS AS A PART OF A COMMUNITY. EVERY CHILD DESERVES AN OPPORTUNITY TO PLAY, BELONG AND BE INCLUDED, REGARDLESS OF THEIR ABILITIES. FAMILIES IN THE EAST VALLEY. WE HAVE TO GO ALL THE WAY TO LA QUINTA IN ORDER TO BE ACCEPTED INTO A TEAM. I THINK IT'S FINALLY TIME FOR US TO DO IT HERE IN PART OF OUR COMMUNITY WHERE WE LIVE, ATTEND SCHOOL. I ALSO ENCOURAGE THE CITY TO BECOME TO INCLUDE AFFORDABLE AND CLEARLY DEFINED FEES IN THE MOU. SO COST NEVER BECOMES A BARRIER FOR ORGANIZATIONS SERVING CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES, MAKING THESE PROGRAMS ACCESSIBLE, MEANING MAKING THEM FINANCIAL ACCESSIBLE AS WELL. TOGETHER, WE COULD CREATE A COMMUNITY WHERE EVERY CHILD HAS A CHANCE TO PARTICIPATE, MAKE FRIENDS AND THRIVE. MAKE FRIENDS IS A BIG ONE FOR ME. I DON'T HAVE NOWHERE TO TAKE MY KIDS RIGHT NOW. WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE A BASEBALL TEAM, AND IT'S IT'S HARD BECAUSE NOBODY KNOW. I DON'T KNOW WHERE TO TAKE THESE KIDS TO PLAY. I DON'T KNOW WHO'S GOING TO CHARGE US, WHO'S GOING TO DO WHAT OR WHO CAN I TAKE IT TO SO I COULD START MY TEAM? LOOK, WE HAVE THESE KIDS THAT ARE READY TO PLAY. THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO PLAY, BUT THEY WOULD LOVE THE CHANCE TO TO ACTUALLY BE SEEN. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. JASON. ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ZOOM? IF THERE'S ANYBODY ONLINE WHO WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. THERE ARE NONE. SEEING NO MORE PUBLIC COMMENTS, WE CAN CONTINUE WITH DISCUSSION. CITY COUNCIL, OPEN THE FLOOR, COUNCILWOMAN DELGADO. SO I'M GOING TO JUMP INTO A FEW THINGS. ANDREW. THERE'S A FEW A FEW ITEMS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO ADD. LANGUAGE IS ONE FOR DISCRIMINATION AND NOT JUST FOR KIDS WITH DISABILITY, BUT GENDER. SO THAT WE JUST PUT IT ALL IN THERE SO THAT WE MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE INCLUSIVE AND THAT PUTS IT ALL IN THERE. AND THEN ALSO I'LL CALL THE PRESIDENT IN A, IN A UP IN A BIT ABOUT WHETHER THEY CAN HAVE TEAMS FOR, FOR KIDS WITH DISABILITIES. THE SECOND THING IS THAT THAT WE ADD LANGUAGE ABOUT SUBLEASING SUBLEASING PARKS, NOT FIELDS, FIELDS THAT WE ADD LANGUAGE FOR TO NOT BE ABLE TO SUBLEASE FIELDS. OKAY. AND THEN ALSO POSSIBLY LANGUAGE ABOUT CLUBS. AND I SAY THIS BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT CLUBS ITSELF AND WHAT LEAGUES HAVE WHAT CLUBS. AND ADDITIONALLY IS THAT THE CLUBS ARE CHARGING A LOT MORE THAN, THAN WHAT THE FEE IS FOR REGULAR TEAMS UNDER THE NONPROFIT. SO I WOULD LIKE SOME LANGUAGE IN THERE AND WE CAN DISCUSS IT NOW ABOUT WHAT WHAT TYPE OF THINGS WE WANT UNDER THERE. BUT WHAT I'M HEARING IS THAT SOME OF THE CLUBS ARE, ARE CHARGING $500 FOR SEASON 1200. AND IT VARIES. IT VARIES. AND SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT LANGUAGE IS IN THERE AS WELL, THAT THEY CANNOT SUB LEASE FIELDS AND THEY CANNOT BRING IN CLUBS, PRIVATE CLUBS. SO THE CLUB ITSELF WOULD HAVE TO BE IDENTIFIED UNDER THE NONPROFIT AND THEN BE OPERATING AS A NONPROFIT, NOT A FOR PROFIT. AND THEN ADDITIONALLY IS SO, SO THE AVENUE AND I HATE TO GET ON THIS TOPIC, BUT THE AVENUE 53 ARE PARKS OR FIELDS ARE, ARE WE ELIMINATING THOSE OR NO. OKAY, OKAY. THERE'S NO PLAN RIGHT NOW TO ELIMINATE THOSE. WE ARE RENEGOTIATING THE LEASE RIGHT NOW WITH ARM TECH, AND OUR EXISTING LEASE ACTUALLY HAS A CLAUSE IN THERE TO AUTOMATICALLY EXTEND IT TO THE NEXT YEAR. SO SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO USE THEM. YES. THERE'S YEAH, THERE'S NO PLAN. THERE'S NO PLAN RIGHT NOW TO ELIMINATE THAT LEASE OR THE SUB OR THE SUB LEASE AGREEMENTS. AND THEN ADDITIONALLY IS THAT IF THERE IS A REPORT ABOUT ANY [01:35:06] OF THE LEAGUES HAVING A CLUB THAT'S CHARGING 500, 200, 1000, 1200, THAT AS A CITY, WE'RE LOOKING INTO IT. SO I DON'T WANT TO JUST HEAR THAT SOMEONE'S OPERATING WITH THE CLUB, BUT THAT WE LOOK INTO THAT LEAGUE ITSELF AND FURTHER INVESTIGATE WHETHER THEY DO HAVE A CLUB, A FOR PROFIT CLUB UNDER THEIR NONPROFIT. OKAY. AND IF THERE'S ANY COMPLAINTS, DO THEY GO TO YOU, ANDREW, IF THERE IS ANY VIOLATION GOING ON WITH EITHER LEAGUE, DO THEY GO TO YOU OR WHO DO THEY GO TO? THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO NOTIFY THE CITY WHEN THERE'S VIOLATIONS. YES. THAT'S SO THAT'S PART OF SECTION 6.8 IS INCREASING THAT COMMUNICATION AND REQUIRING THAT WHEN THERE'S VIOLATIONS THAT THEY NOTIFY THE CITY ABOUT THOSE VIOLATIONS. AND THE PRIOR MOU WAS PART THREE ALREADY SAYS IN THE PRIOR MOU, YES, THE FIELD THREE. OH, AND NOT THE PRIOR ONE. SO THIS WOULD BE LIKE AMENDMENT 12. SO IN THE MOST RECENT MOU, AMENDMENT 13, FIELD THREE WAS CVSL PRIOR TO THAT. SO PRIOR TO 2021, FIELD THREE WAS CCIS. OKAY. AND WHEN. SO WHEN IT COMES TO THESE FEES, RIGHT. SO COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS? YOU CAN GO. NO. GO AHEAD. NO, I JUST LOOK FOR SOMETHING. NO, I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY JUST STICK TO THE TWO ALTERNATIVES THAT WE HAVE HERE, OKAY? BECAUSE WE'RE GOING OUT OF TOPIC. IF WE WANTED TO ADD THE WORDING WHERE WE ALLOW ALL CHILDREN'S, WHETHER THEY HAVE A DISABILITY OR NOT, DOES THAT HAVE TO BE ADDED INTO THE MOU AND WOULD WE HAVE TO BRING IT BACK? I BELIEVE WE COULD MAKE A MOTION BECAUSE WE ALSO LISTEN HERE TO ALLOW THE CITY MANAGER TO MAKE A KIND OF NON-SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AS NEEDED. SO IF YOU WANTED TO ADD A NONDISCRIMINATION SECTION, I THINK WE COULD ADD THAT WITHOUT HAVING TO BRING IT BACK TO COUNCIL. IT WOULD BE AS LONG AS IT WOULD BE REVIEWED BY OUR CITY MANAGER AND OUR CITY ATTORNEY STAFF. IT WOULD BE ADDED IN THE MOTION. YES. MY ONE QUESTION IS ITEM NUMBER EIGHT OF THE MOU FINANCIAL AUDIT IS VERY VAGUE. YES. AND WHEN IS THE FIRST QUESTION? WHEN IS THE LAST TIME? BECAUSE THE LAST ONE I FOUND THAT THE CITY AUDIT WAS THAT I COULD FIND ONLINE WAS 2019 THAT THE CITY CONDUCTED AUDIT. SO I'M NOT SURE. MAYBE I JUST COULDN'T FIND THE MOST RECENT ONE BECAUSE IT'S A BIANNUAL AUDIT, RIGHT. IT'S EVERY TWO YEARS FROM WHAT I WAS READING IN HERE. RIGHT. THE CITY CONDUCTS OF, OF ALL THE LEAGUES. YES. I'M NOT SU WHEN THE MOST RECENT AUDIT WAS DONE. I WOULD HAVE TO GET BACK TO YOU WITH THAT INFORMATION. BUT THEN THE OTHER QUESTION ON HERE IS. SO IT'S A BI ANNUALLY. SO PRIOR TO THE SPORTS LEAGUES WILL PROVIDE NOTIFICATION OF ALL DOCUMENTS REQUESTED. SO 30 DAYS, ALL MEMBERS, ALL MEMBERS OF SPORT LEAGUE BOARDS MUST ATTEND THE ANNUAL 501 C THREE TRAINING PROVIDED BY THE CITY. SO WE DO THAT EVERY YEAR. THAT TRAINING. DO WE HIRE A CONSULTANT? I'M ASSUMING IT'S GOING TO BE A CONSULTANT, RIGHT? THAT DOES THIS OR SOMEONE THAT TRAINS ON 501 THREE C'S. I DON'T WE DO NOT BE WE DO NOT PROVIDE THAT TRAINING OR PAY FOR THAT TRAINING. SO THAT'S SOMETHING THEY HAVE TO DO ON THEIR OWN. THEN YOU GOT TO CHANGE THE LANGUAGE AS IS PROVIDED BY THE CITY. OKAY, THAT SO IT'S THAT'S ON THEIR OWN ACCORD. SO JUST MAKE SURE YOU CHANGE 8.2 BECAUSE THAT MAKES IT SEEM AS THE CITY'S, IT'S THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO BE PROVIDING THAT ALL SPORT LEAGUES MUST OBTAIN A FINANCIAL AUDIT SCORE OF C OR HIGHER. AND EACH SPORTS LEAGUES FINANCIAL AUDIT SCORE MUST IMPROVE EACH YEAR. LINCOLN AUDITING IS A C WHAT IS THE SCORE? LEVELS OF AUDITING WHEN PEOPLE GET FINANCIAL AUDITING REPORTS. YEAH. UNMODIFIED LINCOLN IF YOU CAN COME UP. YEAH. UNMODIFIED. SO A CLEAN OPINION FROM AN EXTERNAL AUDIT IS CALLED AN UNMODIFIED OPINION. OKAY. SO MAYBE WE CAN CHANGE THE LANGUAGE BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHY THIS HAS A SCORE. MAYBE MAYBE IT'S MORE LIKE AN INTERNAL AUDIT. AND THEY RATE IT BASED ON CRITERIA. THAT IS CORRECT AND HAVE A SCORE. I THINK THAT THEY HAVE TO BE MANUEL. YOU HAVE TO BE ABOVE 70% 75. AND THE AUDIT. ALMA EL NUMERO BUENO TIENEN SU SU THIRD PARTY AUDIT. OH, YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M SORRY. ALMA, CAN YOU COME FORWARD? I WANT TO. ANTES DE LA PANDEMIA. LA PANDEMIA NUEVOS MIEMBROS ESTO YA NO SON [01:40:12] NOTIFICADO VAN A HACER AUDITORIA ENCANTADA ESTE PERO LA ULTIMA ES ANTES DE LA PANDEMIA ERA UN OCHENTA LO MAS OCHENTA YA SEA FALTABA ALGO MAS DE UN TIEMPO A VOLVEREMOS CON LOS PAPELES NO CUMPLIDO, CINCO POR CIENTO, PERO DIFICILMENTE LLEGAMOS. POR MUCHAS COSAS. A CAUSA DE ESA ESA. CLASE DE LA 501 YO FEMALE SEMINARIO DE LA 501 IN LOS ANGELES. SI TRATADO DE AYER CON FORM A CLASS Y AUN ASI, PUES ALGO Y POR ESO, LOS AUDITORIA SIEMPRE FUERON. CINCO, PERO NUNCA MAS DE. SI PARA ARRIBA. OKAY. SO OKAY. SO YEAH, SO I THINK 8.3 ALSO NEEDS TO GET REWRITTEN IN THE LANGUAGE OF WHATEVER, WHATEVER SCORING RUBRIC WE'RE USING JUST SO THAT IT'S FAIR TO THEM AS THEY GET THE AUDIT DONE THAT WAY. IT'S NOT LIKE, WELL, WE, WE CONCISE WITH THAT LANGUAGE. I THINK THAT'S WHAT'S IMPORTANT HERE. AS I WAS READING THE, IT'S THE LANGUAGE THAT THAT THAT I'M TRYING TO BE FAIR TO ALL THE SPORTS BECAUSE THIS IS THIS MOU IS NOT SOCCER, IT'S BASEBALL AND FOOTBALL. JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S CONSISTENT. AND WHAT DOES A WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? AND IF SOMEONE'S USING THIS, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN ON THAT ITEM? IS. LA MISMA CIUDAD AUDITOR INSTRUCCIONES. QUÉ AUDITORIA. ENTONCES SI NOS DABAN MAS COMO IBA COMO NOS EVEN A PREGUNTAR. QUÉ. ENTREGAR. VAMOS A UNA CLASE AHI REGRESSIONS NOS RECUERDO MUCHO ANDO. PERO SI DANDO COMO INFORMACION DE QUÉ. PERO PERO DESPUÉS DE ESO SI EN UN BUEN TRABAJO DE ESTAR ARRIBA DE LA OCHENTA Y TAMBIÉN POR TODO LO RECEIVERS. Y TODO LO MAS DESDE LAS DONACIONES EN LOS NINOS UNIFORMES TODO ESO DE AHI ESO SERBIAN IS OKAY TO RECEIVE A DONATION A NOMBRE TUYO CONCISA PERO TO RECEIVE. ES UNA CARTA DE AGRADECIMIENTO A LAS PERSONAS ESA DONATION Y RECIBIDOS Y AHI APRENDEMOS TODO ESO COMO HACER SOBRE LAS DONACIONES A COACH PARA SU EQUIPO UNIFORMS. THANK YOU. RECUERDO FUIMOS LA PRIMERA LIGA EN LA PLAZA. USTEDES TIENEN. AHI VAMOS LA PRIMERA LO TENEMOS. THANK YOU. GRACIAS. OKAY. AND THEN MY QUESTION ON CODE OF CONDUCT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE ON A POST POSTED ON SOCIAL MEDIA BY SISA THEY HAVE THESE DIFFERENT MAY 22ND. THEY HAVE THESE DIFFERENT CHARGES. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IF THOSE ARE GOING TO BE THE FEES THAT WE'RE GOING TO CHARGE. I DON'T KNOW WHERE THOSE FEES CAME. I WOULD WANT TO SEE LIKE WHAT FEES FEE, WHAT FEES IF THEY VIOLATE CERTAIN THINGS ARE ON THIS. IF, IF THEY VIOLATE, LIKE, I DON'T WANT TO MAKE IT GENERIC FOR EVERYONE ACROSS BECAUSE THEN IT'S SO IT'S LIKE I'M CONFUSED OF WHY THERE'S FEES, WHO COLLECTS THE FEES? I KNOW THE PARK RANGER SHOWS UP, RIGHT? SO THAT'S THE OTHER THING. WHERE DOES THE PARK RANGER FIT INTO THIS WHOLE LANGUAGE? I'LL LET YOU SPEAK BECAUSE I ASKED THREE QUESTIONS. SO THE PARK RANGER ENFORCES THE FEES PER OUR MUNICIPAL CODE. SO THOSE FEES ARE ESTABLISHED PER OUR MUNICIPAL CODE. I THINK HE MAY HAVE HAD SOME MISUNDERSTANDING RECENTLY, BECAUSE I THINK HE HAD BEEN ISSUING SOME FEES TO THE LEAGUES, WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE EXISTING MOU. SO WE CAN EVALUATE THOSE. AND WE WOULD MOST LIKELY STRIKE THOSE. SO YEAH, BECAUSE THOSE IN THIS THIS DOES NOT SAY THAT THOSE FEES WOULD BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE LEAGUES. SO UNLESS IT WAS. WHAT'S THE LANGUAGE, YOU KNOW, REPEATED, SERIOUS, REPEATED AND INVOLVED SPECIFICALLY VIOLENCE, THREATS OF VIOLENCE. SO IF WE HAVE REPEATED OFFENSES AND THE LEAGUES ARE NOT TAKING MEASURES TO ADDRESS REPEATED OFFENSES, THEN THEN THOSE FINES COULD BE SENT TO THE LEAGUE IN ADDITION TO THE INDIVIDUAL. YEAH. SO SO THAT'S WHERE I WANT TO MAKE SURE THE, YOU KNOW, IT'S IN THE CURRENT CITY OR MUNICIPAL CODE. [01:45:09] IF SOMEONE IS IN PUBLIC, IN PUBLIC, INTOXICATED AND DRINKING, YOU AUTOMATICALLY GET A FINE. THERE'S NO LIKE, WELL, NEXT TIME, DON'T DO THIS, PUT IT AWAY. IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT THAT GETS ENFORCED BECAUSE THEY'RE, THEY'RE IN A PLACE WITH CHILDREN. AND SOMETIMES IF IT'S GLASS OR ANYTHING, THAT'S WHAT'S VERY IMPORTANT IS, YOU KNOW, I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE LANGUAGE IS HAS SOME TEETH IN HERE FOR, FOR IT'S THE SAFE BECAUSE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE KIDS, RIGHT? THE SAFETY AND, AND PREVENTING THIS BECAUSE IF IT DOESN'T HAVE ENOUGH TEETH, THEN PEOPLE ARE GONNA BE LIKE, WELL, I'M GONNA DO A ONE TIME, SECOND TIME, AND THEN I'M GOING TO GET A FEE. IT HAS TO HAVE TEETH UP FRONT. OTHERWISE, I THINK, YOU KNOW, BUT IT ISN'T ON THE LEAGUES. I THINK IT'S ON THE INDIVIDUAL, BUT IT'S ALSO UP TO THE LEAGUES TO IF THEY SEE IT, THEY GOT TO CALL IT. THEY GOT TO REPORT IT BECAUSE I THINK THAT'S THAT'S THEIR RESPONSIBILITY ON THE FIELD IS THEIR SAFETY IS FOR THE CHILDREN WHO ARE PLAYING THERE. AND THEN IF THEY SEE SOMETHING THAT'S GOING ON, THEY GOT TO REPORT IT. AND MAYBE WE HAVE A DEDICATED HOTLINE FOR THE LEAGUES, BASEBALL OR FOOTBALL. IF THEY SEE SOMETHING LIKE THAT, THEN THEY CAN REPORT IT WHERE IT GOES. I KNOW THERE'S SPECIAL LINES, BUT IT'S DEDICATED FOR REPORTING THAT. SO THAT WAY IT'S NOT EMERGENCY OR ANYTHING SO THAT IT'S THEIR IDEAS. YOU DON'T HAVE TO DO IT, BUT JUST IN THERE. AND I THINK THAT'S JUST WHAT'S MISSING BECAUSE SEEING A POSTER, IT SAYS THERE'S THESE FEES, THE LEAKS CAN HAVE THEIR OWN FEES, RIGHT ON IF THEY DO ANYTHING. OR HOW DOES THAT WORK? IF THEY HAVE ANY LIKE PENALTIES OR THINGS LIKE THAT, THAT'S ON THEMSELVES, RIGHT? THEY CAN IMPOSE THEIR OWN FEES. YEAH. THEY CAN IMPOSE THEIR OWN FEES. THEY SO THEY HAVE THEIR OWN CODE OF CONDUCT THAT'S WITHIN THEIR CONTRACTS THAT THEY APPLY TO PEOPLE THAT APPLY TO THIS AS WELL, RELATIVE TO THE PARK RANGER APPLYING FEES. YOU KNOW, HE'S JUST APPLYING THE MUNICIPAL CODE. SO HE SHOULD BE APPLYING THAT EQUALLY ACROSS THE BOARD TO ALL LEAGUES TO ANYONE WHO'S THERE, EVEN IF THEY'RE JUST THEY'RE DRINKING AND THEY'RE NOT PART OF A SPORTS LEAGUE IN THE PARK RANGERS HOURS TO ROTATE AROUND THERE. I LITERALLY WAS JUST THERE ON MONDAY NIGHT. THERE WAS THERE WAS THREE PEOPLE, YOUNG CHILDREN, YOUNG ADULTS RIDING AROUND IN THOSE ELECTRIC SCOOTERS IN A PARK WHEN I WAS WALKING AROUND. AND HOW DO WE, YOU KNOW, WHAT TIME DO THEY ROTATE? HOW DO YOU PREVENT THAT? BECAUSE I, I ALMOST GOT RUN OVER BY THE BICYCLE. AND SO, AND IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT INTRODUCING OTHER TYPE OF THINGS, I THINK THAT'S WHAT HOW DO WE MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE BEING GOOD PARTNERS WITH THE LEAGUES SO THAT THEY KNOW THEY GOT A REPORT WHEN THEY SEE THINGS, BECAUSE THAT CAN ALSO BECOME A SAFETY HAZARD FOR THE PEOPLE THAT ARE PLAYING ON THE FIELDS WITH THEM, RIGHT? BECAUSE I KNOW THERE'S GENERAL LIABILITY. WE HAD OTHER LANGUAGE, BUT IT'S ABOUT IF YOU SEE IT, REPORT IT BECAUSE IT CAN, IT CAN BECOME A BIGGER, BIGGER ISSUE. SO THOSE ARE THE ITEMS ON NUMBER NINE THAT I WANTED TO ASK, IS THERE SOMETHING YOU WANT TO SPECIFICALLY ADD TO THE MOU? OR ARE YOU SAYING AS A POLICY MOVING FORWARD YOU'D LIKE TO ESTABLISH A HOTLINE? IS THAT SOMETHING WE COULD WORK WITH OUR PIO TO ADDRESS TO HAVE? I THINK IT HAS TO WORK WITH ALL THE WITH ALL THE LEAGUES, AS A AS A POLICY OF, YOU KNOW, HOW DO YOU MAYBE WE, WE CREATE SIGNS ON THE PARKS WHERE IT'S. IF YOU SEE SOMETHING, YOU KNOW, THERE'S NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH NUMBERS, RIGHT? MAYBE YOU ALSO DO SOMETHING IN THE PARK. WHEN YOU SEE SOMETHING, YOU CAN CALL THAT NUMBER AND REPORT IT. SO IT'S A LARGER POLICY. IT ISN'T JUST TO THE LEAGUES, BUT IF THEY'RE THE ONES UTILIZING THE FIELDS AND PLAYING ON IT, THEY SHOULD BE CALLING. IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT'S ON THE PREMISE WHILE THEY'RE PLAYING. SO I THINK THAT'S A THAT'S A BIG THING BECAUSE I SAW IT AND I'VE BEEN WALKING THE PARKS THE LAST COUPLE OR TWO MONTHS AND JUST LOOKING AT THINGS. SO WITH MY DOGS. SO. AND THEN THE TERM, HOW DID YOU GET FIVE YEARS? WELL, THE REASON I USE FIVE YEARS IS BECAUSE OUR LEASE AND SUBLEASE AGREEMENT AT AVENUE 53 IS ALSO FIVE YEARS. SO JUST SO THAT OUR LEASES AND OUR LEASES AND OUR CONTRACTS KIND OF ALL COINCIDE WITH EACH OTHER. BUT I, I HAVE A QUESTION AND THIS IS FOR THE COACHES. NO QUIERO DECIR TIENEN UNA META IGUAL AYUDAR PARTICIPAR TRAER A LOS NINOS A Q PARTICIPEN PORQUE NO TRABAJAR JUNTOS VERDAD PORQUE ES UNA SOLA META VERDAD COMUNICARSE ENTRE USTEDES. QUÉ ES LO MAS PUEDE HACER O MANAGEMENT VERDAD INCORPORAR LOS EQUIPOS CON ESTE CON ESPECIAL COMO EL AUTISMO Y TODO ESO ES VERDAD. ENTONCES SI EL PROBLEMA ES EL EL CAMPO NUMERO TRES PORQUE NO PORQUE NO COMUNICARSE ENTRE LOS PROFESIONALES DE LA LIGA COMUNICARSE ENTRE USTEDES AL FINAL DEL DIA. LA META ES DE PARTICIPAR EN LOS DEPORTES DE LOS NINOS NOS TENS EN SU CELLULAR EN SUS TABLETS Y TODO PARA QUÉ AHORA EN UNA LINEA DE COMUNICACION ENTRE USTEDES ENTRE LOS DOS PRECEDENTES, TAMBIÉN COMO TE AGRADEZCO LOS PROBLEMAS AQUI DE POR SI YA TENEMOS, PERO ABRIR UNA LINEA DE COMUNICACION IMPORTANTISIMO PORQUE LA META ES ESA. ENTONCES [01:50:04] SI PODEMOS DE ALGUNA MANERA NOSOTROS AYUDARLES A Q TOMAN TURNOS EN EL EN EL CAMPO NUMERO THREE Y SE PUEDEN COMUNICAR ENTRE USTEDES DOS SABES QUÉ BUENO? VAMOS A HACER UN JUEGO AHORA. TU SABES. ENTONCES LA COMUNICACION LA LINEA DE COMUNICACION ABIERTA PORQUE AL FINAL VAMOS A HACER GRACIAS PORQUE ME ACUERDO CON VINIERON AQUI TRABAJAR JUNTOS Y VAMOS A HACER UNA PURA LIGA Y ESO LO VEMOS PORQUE ESO SE QUEDA GRABADO Y PARA NOSOTROS. TENEMOS ABIERTO. ENTONCES A LA EL CONSEJO DE MARTINEZ. AQUI TRABAJAR JUNTOS PORQUE EL FIN DEL DIA DECIDIMOS DEJAR LAS DOS LIGAS. SI. OKAY. ESTE ES EL CAMPO. ESTE ES EL CAMPO DE LA TELEVISION. VERDAD NO ES ES ES ES EL OTRO CUATRO. PERO COMO DICE EL MARTINEZ ES DIJERON A TRABAJAR JUNTOS COMO SE PUEDE TRABAJAR EN TORNO E PORQUE SE ESTAN TRABAJANDO PARA LOS NINOS. ESO LO VAMOS RECORDAR VERDAD. ENTONCES ONE LAST THING I HAVE FOR YOU ANDREW ON. CAN WE ADD LANGUAGE IN HERE THAT SAYS WHAT TIME THE LEAGUES ARE ABLE TO USE THE SOCCER FIELDS WHEN IT'S COMMUNITY FIELD DAYS BECAUSE THERE'S NO LANGUAGE ON HERE. RIGHT. AND I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE WHAT TIME IS THAT SWITCH OVER? DO WE NEED TO ADD A BUFFER TIME FOR THE LEAGUES TO BE ABLE TO GET READY? I THINK THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE WE CAN'T JUST AUTOMATICALLY, OKAY, IT'S SIX, IT'S 8:00 NOW. YOU CAN USE IT AND THEN THE LEAGUES DON'T NEED 30 MINUTES TO SET UP. AND I KNOW I WENT OUT THIS WEEK TOO, AND I SAW AND IT'S, IT'S A LOT OF MOVEMENT BECAUSE YOU GOT TO GET THE KIDS READY, YOU GOT TO MOVE THEM. SO I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT WORKS. WE GIVE THEM A, YOU KNOW, LIKE, WHAT IS THAT LIKE LEEWAY TIME, RIGHT? THERE'S NO LANGUAGE ON HERE ON THE COMMUNITY USE DAYS AND ALL THAT KIND OF JAZZ. SO, SO. I BELIEVE THE COMMUNITY USE DAYS ARE IT IS THE FULL DAY. SO THE THEY CAN'T HAVE THE ORGANIZED GAMES OR THE SCHEDULED GAMES. I KNOW THAT THE LEAGUES OFTEN THE THE PARENTS, THE PLAYERS AND COACHES WILL STILL SCHEDULE TIME DURING THOSE COMMUNITY USE DAYS AS WELL, KIND OF SEPARATE FROM THE ACTUAL SCHEDULED LEAGUE PLAY, OF COURSE, YOU'RE ALLOWED TO DO. OBVIOUSLY. YEAH, YEAH. SO AS FAR AS A TRANSITION DURING A GIVEN DAY, WE DON'T WE DON'T HAVE ANY COMMUNITY DAYS WHERE IT'S KIND OF HALF COMMUNITY AND HALF LEAGUE. IT'S SO ON YOUR WEBSITE, THERE'S CERTAIN DAYS THAT ARE COMMUNITY DAYS. YES. SO YOU'RE TELLING ME THAT I WENT MONDAY TO WALK AROUND A PARK, EVEN THOUGH ON YOUR WEBSITE IT SAYS THIS IS A COMMUNITY DAY, AT WHAT TIME DOES IT BECOME THE LEAGUE'S SPACE IN THE EVENING? I'M NOT SURE I'D HAVE TO. I COULD ANSWER THAT QUESTION. IF YOU WANT TO GO TO THE MICROPHONE, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE SO THAT IT'S CLEAR. RIGHT. WHEN THE MOU WAS ANNOUNCED ON MONDAYS, WEDNESDAYS AND FRIDAYS ON THE MICROPHONE, MONDAYS, WEDNESDAYS AND FRIDAYS, OUR COMMUNITY AFTER 8 P.M. ON MONDAYS, WEDNESDAYS. AND WE COULD USE THEM AS A LEAGUE, BUT MONDAYS, WEDNESDAYS AND FRIDAYS PARK IS AVAILABLE. AND I BELIEVE RANCHO FLORIDA SAYS TUESDAYS, THURSDAYS, SATURDAY. OKAY. IF WE CAN ADD THAT INTO THE MOU. I THINK THOSE ARE ALREADY ON THERE. ARE THEY ARE THERE. WHAT WHAT PARAGRAPH ARE THEY ON? BECAUSE I DIDN'T KNOW I MEAN, BEFORE IT WAS THAT'S WHY WE THAT'S THE THING. YEAH. BECAUSE I READ THIS ONE AND I DIDN'T SEE IT. SO I'M GLAD THAT YOU. 13 PARAGRAPH 13. WE AGREED ON. NO, YOU WERE SPEAKING ABOUT THE OTHER. OH, IT WAS ON NUMBER 13. SO OKAY, WE CAN BRING THAT AND ADD IT BACK TOGETHER BECAUSE I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT IT'S NOTED. OKAY. IF IT WAS THERE BEFORE, I DON'T KNOW WHY IT DISAPPEARED FROM THIS OTHER ONE. SO OKAY, SO IF HE SAYS IN THE 13, LET'S LOOK AT THAT AS WELL. THE THE 8 P.M. WAS ADDED BECAUSE OF THE TIME OF THE DAY. THEY WEREN'T BEING USED BY COMMUNITY OR BY KIDS. SO THE LEAGUES WANTED TO BE ABLE TO USE IT DURING THE TIME BETWEEN 8 AND 10 FOR THE ADULTS. RIGHT? FOR REGARDING THE THE MAYOR'S COMMENT ABOUT SCOOTERS IS THAT THAT'S A PROBLEM THROUGHOUT THE CITY. AND SO I WANT TO BRING BACK THE THE SCOOTERS AND TALK ABOUT THE CITATIONS. AND I KNOW IT'S IT'S AN ONGOING ISSUE AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S BEING BROUGHT AT THE STATE LEVEL AS WELL, BECAUSE IT'S HARD TO REGULATE. AND SO BUT I DO THINK THAT WE JUST NEED TO LOOK AT THAT POLICY. ABSOLUTELY, COUNCILMEMBER. I HAVE WORKED ON ELECTRIC DEVICE ORDINANCES SO I [01:55:02] CAN BRING SOMETHING BACK TO YOU IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS. WONDERFUL. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? COUNCIL MEMBERS? OKAY. IT'S MY FRIEND AND I ENTERTAIN A MOTION AND THERE'S A COUPLE CHANGES. SO YES, SO I'VE BEEN TAKING NOTES, KEEPING TRACK OF THE CHANGES HAVE BEEN REQUESTED. SO WE HAVE IF WE STILL DETERMINE THAT THESE ARE KIND OF NON-SUBSTANTIAL MOVING FORWARD, I I'M OF THE MENTALITY THAT IF YOU'RE GOING TO DO A FIVE YEAR CONTRACT, I THINK WE CAN EASE INTO THE FIRST YEAR OF THE CONTRACT, NOT CHARGE FEES. OKAY. AND THEN, YOU KNOW, YOU SAID IT LEAVES IT OPEN BECAUSE THE LANGUAGE ON THE MOU IS ESSENTIALLY LIKE IT'S GOING TO BE A COUNCIL TO COUNCIL KIND OF THING, RIGHT? AND THEN YOU CAN DETERMINE, I THINK, SWITCHING THE LIGHT ON TO THEM WITHOUT ENOUGH NOTICE, LIKE NOW THEY'RE GONNA, YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO GO AND BE LIKE, OH, NOW WHAT IS GOING TO RATE STRUCTURE GOING TO LOOK LIKE? SO YOU GIVE THEM ENOUGH TIME TO SAY, OKAY, WE'RE GOING TO PHASE IN FEES. WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE? YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU, WHEN YOU, I UNDERSTAND THOUGH, BECAUSE YOU'RE LIKE PART OF THE BUDGET, $100,000 A YEAR. I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND THAT PORTION. BUT IT, IT'S, I WENT AND WALKED THE BARONS AND THEY TOLD ME THAT SOMETIMES THE PARENTS HAVE TO COME TOGETHER TO, YOU KNOW, HELP EACH OTHER OUT SO THEY CAN GET STUFF FOR THEIR KIDS. SO I'M LIKE, THAT'S THE HARD PART IS LIKE, HOW DO YOU TURN ON THE, HOW DO YOU TURN ON? IT'S LIKE TURNING ON THE COLD WATER AND TELLING YOU SOMEONE TO SHOWER IN COLD WATER AND NOT LETTING IT GET WARM. I WOULDN'T WANT IT IN THE COLD WATER UNLESS IT'S SUPER HOT OUTSIDE. SO, SO ANDREW, IF WE CAN IMPLEMENT IN THE MOU, THE FIRST YEAR WOULD BE WITHOUT NO FEES. AND THEN SECOND YEAR WE START GRADUALLY, THEN INCREASING IT THROUGHOUT THE FIVE YEAR TO GET TO THE 100%. YEAH. SO YOU'D LIKE TO INCORPORATE THAT INTO THE MOU LANGUAGE. NOW WITH A SET FEE SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED WITH A FIVE YEAR PERIOD. THAT'S RIGHT, THAT'S RIGHT. OKAY. FOR THE FIRST YEAR. AND THEN WE SLOWLY EVERY SINGLE YEAR, THEN INCREASE IT, BUT THEN THAT IT'S IN THE MOU SO THAT WE AVOID HAVING TO BRING THIS ITEM FORWARD AND THEN ASK FOR AN INCREASE THAT WE IMPLEMENT IT NOW IN THERE. OKAY. DO YOU HAVE A PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE? WOULD WE BE MAXING OUT AT 50% AT THE FIVE YEAR PERIOD? NEXT QUESTION. ARE WE GOING TO GO ALL THE WAY TO 100%, OR ARE WE GOING TO TAP AT 50% AND IT'S A ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION FOR THAT TYPE OF IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE? ONE REASON I DID WANT TO ALSO LEAVE IT ALONE AS BEING A YEARLY DECISION IS AS A CITY WIDE POLICY. WE'RE CURRENTLY LOOKING AT USER FEES AND REEVALUATING USER FEES THROUGH OUR FINANCE DEPARTMENT. SO COULD YOU ADD A CAVEAT BASED ON WHATEVER THAT FISCAL YEAR IS? USER FEES ARE. YEAH. SO AS THAT GOES. SO IF WE IF WE ESTABLISH A PERCENTAGE THAT THAT MOVES FORWARD, THAT MIGHT BE A BIGGER JUMP IN A SINGLE YEAR THAN YOU MIGHT ANTICIPATE IF THOSE USER FEES ARE MODIFIED. SO THAT'S WHY BEING ABLE TO HAVE IT BE AN ANNUAL DECISION ALLOWS US TO KIND OF EVALUATE ON A YEAR BY YEAR BASIS IN CASE THOSE USER FEES ARE MODIFIED. WHEN WE DO OUR USER FEE STUDY, THAT'S THAT'S PENDING. SO I'M, I'M WONDERING IF THE COUNCIL WOULD CONSIDER THAT THE SECOND YEAR B 25. SO WE'RE STILL HALF OF THAT 50%. THE THIRD YEAR. B THE 50%. BUT THEN AFTER THAT, THAT THEY COME BACK BEFORE COUNCIL FOR ANY INCREASES ADDITIONAL TO THE 50% THAT'S BEING REQUESTED. YEAH, I SUPPORT THAT. I SUPPORT THAT, BUT ALSO TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THAT THE LEAKS ARE NOT GOING TO PASS THOSE FEES INTO THE, THE SIGN UPS TO, TO THE KIDS. YEAH, TO THE KIDS. SO AS WE COMMIT TO THE FEES, THE FUEL USE FEES, WE ALSO NEED ALL THE LEAKS NOT TO PASS THAT EXPENSE INTO THE REGISTRATION. IF YOU GUYS ARE INTO AN AGREEMENT, OF COURSE. YEAH. CAN WE BRIAN, CAN WE IMPLEMENT THAT? THAT'S SO WHEN IT COMES TO COST, IT'S VERY DIFFICULT BECAUSE THEY ARE A NONPROFIT AND IT'S DIFFICULT FOR US TO MAKE TO. WE CAN WE CAN ASK THEM IN GOOD FAITH TO FOLLOW THIS. BUT I DON'T THINK THAT WE CAN IMPLEMENT IT IN THE MOU. AND THAT GOES BEFORE THEIR BOARD TO THEN DISCUSS WHAT COST AND FEES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH IT, AM I RIGHT? YEAH, I THINK THAT'S RIGHT. I THINK WE CAN CERTAINLY ASK THEM TO COMMIT IN GOOD FAITH, BUT IT'D BE HARD TO PUT LANGUAGE IN TO ENFORCE THAT TYPE OF PROVISION TO PREVENT THE PASS THROUGH, I BELIEVE, ON THE PRECEDENCE THAT THEY ACT IN GOOD FAITH. SO INSTEAD OF DOING A FULL FLEDGED FIVE YEAR, HOW ABOUT WE DO A THREE YEAR WHERE IT GUARANTEES THAT THE INCREASES AND THEN A TWO YEAR EXTENSION IN THE IN THE CONTRACT. SO IT WOULD BE A FULL FIVE, BUT THEN IT WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK AT THE END OF THAT THIRD YEAR, WHERE THEN WE COULD ASSESS WHERE THE FEES HAVE [02:00:01] INCREASED. IF THERE WAS A FEE STUDY, IS IT GOING TO GO TO 100 AND THEN THAT OPENS IT, AND THEN IT BEGINS THE PROCESS AGAIN TO REDO THE FULL CONTRACT, THE FULL MOU AGAIN. SO THAT WAY, YOU KNOW, SIMILAR TO LIKE NEGOTIATING WITH THEM WITH OTHER THINGS, YOU HAVE THE OPENER AT THAT THIRD YEAR, AND THEN YOU CAN KIND OF SEE WHAT'S WORKING, WHAT'S NOT WORKING. DIFFERENT DISCUSSIONS BY THEN, YOU KNOW, MAYBE THERE'S THINGS THAT HAVE CHANGED. SO THEN THAT WAY IT GIVES YOU STILL A FIVE YEAR CONTRACT. BUT IT'S THAT AT THAT, THE BEGINNING OF THAT THIRD YEAR, YOU CAN BEGIN THE DISCUSSION AND SEE WHAT, WHAT THAT FOURTH YEAR MIGHT LOOK LIKE. AND LIKE YOU SAID, OPENING SO YOU CAN CHANGE THE FEES AND IT ALLOWS FOR THAT, THAT FEE STRUCTURE TO BE REVIEWED. SO AND MAYOR, IF I CAN RIGHT NOW, THE FIVE YEARS, IT'S IT'S ESSENTIALLY ONE YEARS WITH AUTOMATIC RENEWALS. SO AFTER THE THREE YEARS, WE COULD BRING IT BACK FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION. OKAY. YEAH. OKAY. DOES THAT WORK FOR THE TWO PRESIDENTS? IS THAT FINE? YEAH. I'M JUST TRYING TO BE FAIR TO, YOU KNOW, TO ALL OF US. SO BECAUSE THAT WAY YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE HERE EVERY, EVERY YEAR TO GET IT APPROVED. BECAUSE I KNOW IT TAKES A LOT OF TIME BECAUSE RIGHT NOW YOU COULD HAVE BEEN OUT THERE PLAYING SPORTS WITH EVERYBODY ELSE. SO WE'RE WATCHING THE MEXICO GAME OR WATCHING TV. ENTONCES, VAMOS A LAS MANOS. ADELANTE GRABADO. CAN WE HAVE A DISCUSSION? I JUST GOTTA SHAKE HANDS. YOU KNOW, IN GOOD FAITH. AND YOU UNDERSTAND. YOU WERE GOING TO SAY SOMETHING, SIR. AND HAS THERE BEEN DISCUSSION YET ABOUT THE FIELD THREE WHETHER THAT WILL BE CVSL OR. I MEAN I'M OPEN TO THE LIKE SHARING IT IF THEY'RE ABLE TO MAKE IT WORK. LIKE THAT'S, YOU KNOW, OR, OR WE WOULDN'T RECOMMEND THE SHARING BECAUSE THEY DO THEIR SCHEDULES DIFFERENTLY. SO A FIELD REALLY HAS TO BE JUST WITH ONE LEAGUE. I WILL SAY I DON'T HAVE LIKE A REAL STRONG OPINION THAT CVSL IS EITHER A FANTASTIC LEAGUE. WE OFFER SERVICES. C'S IS A FANTASTIC LEAGUE. WE OFFER SERVICES. THE REASON FOR WANTING TO SPLIT IT INTO TWO SEPARATE FIELDS WAS MAINLY ABOUT THE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FROM STAFF. WHEN WE GET COMPLAINTS THAT WE HAVE THAT HOTLINE, IF I HAVE A RANDOM CITIZEN WHO COMPLAINS ABOUT USAGE, ABOUT I KNOW THAT THAT IS THIS LEAGUE. IF I HAVE A COMPLAINT AT LAS FLORES, I KNOW THAT THAT LEAGUE. SO IT JUST KIND OF EASES THE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS FROM THE CITY STAFF. BUT OBVIOUSLY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, YOU KNOW, WANTED TO GO WITH THE RECOMMENDATION TO LEAVE IT AS IS. IF THAT'S THE WISHES OF COUNCIL, THEN THAT'S THAT WOULD BE EASILY SUPPORTED BY STAFF AS WELL. SO THE, THE, THE CONCERN THAT THAT THIS LEAGUE BROUGHT UP, ANDREW, REGARDING ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS BEING ENROLLED, HAVING THEIR THEIR CHILD ENROLLED IN ONE OF THE LEAGUES. IS THAT ACCURATE? I THINK EVERY PARENT, EVERY HAS CHILDREN IN LEAGUES. I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD BE A THERE'S NO FINANCIAL INTEREST THAT WOULD NOT DISQUALIFY SOMEONE FROM VOTING OR PARTICIPATING. THERE WAS ALSO THE COMMENT ABOUT THE VICTOR, AND ACTUALLY HE WAS DETERMINED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE TO RECUSE HIMSELF BECAUSE HE WAS AN UNPAID COACH. HE HAS NO FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE DECISION. SO. SO NO. WELL GO AHEAD. THAT'S RIGHT. AND ULTIMATELY, THIS IS JUST A RECOMMENDATION TO YOU TO MAKE THESE DECISIONS. YEAH. THANK YOU FOR THAT COMMENT TO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION JUST MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS. AND OBVIOUSLY THE FINAL DECISION RESTS WITH CITY COUNCIL. I'M OKAY WITH THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION. THERE'S A PURPOSE. WE EXIST AS A RECOMMENDED BODY. BUT THAT'S MY OPINION. OKAY. SO BRING IT BACK. SO RIGHT NOW POTENTIAL MODIFICATIONS WE HAVE THAT WE'VE LISTED HAS BEEN TO MODIFY SECTION 8.3 RELATIVE TO THE FINANCIAL AUDIT. MODIFY SECTION 8.2 RELATIVE TO THE 501 C THREE TRAINING WHERE IT SAYS PROVIDED BY THE CITY. UNLESS YOU WANTED TO LEAVE THAT LANGUAGE AS IS AND THE CITY CAN JUST TAKE CHARGE AND PROVIDE THAT TRAINING. WHEN IT COMES TO THE AUDIT. YES. WHEN IT COMES TO TRAINING REGARDING WHAT ITEM, I'M SORRY. SO SECTION 8.2 SAYS ALL MEMBERS OF SPORTS LEAGUE BOARDS MUST ATTEND AN ANNUAL FIVE ONE TRAINING PROVIDED BY THE CITY. IF I MEAN, IF YOU WANT TO LEAVE THAT LANGUAGE AS IS, THEN THE CITY WILL WILL TAKE THE EFFORTS TO HIRE A TRAINING STAFF AND PROVIDE THAT. IF WE HAVE THE ABLE TO HIRE ME BEING A LAWYER OR SOMETHING THAT CAN DO THE TRAINING, I KNOW THERE'S A SPECIAL SEMINAR OR SOMETHING THAT WE COULD BRING SOMEBODY. I'M FINE [02:05:01] OFFERING THAT AS PART OF, YOU KNOW, ENSURING THAT WE IF WE'RE ASKING THEM TO DO THIS, WE HOST IT SOMEWHERE. WE, YOU KNOW, SAY SHE HAD TO DRIVE TO LA. I'M LIKE, YOU CAN DO IT IN THE CORPORATE YARD OR SOMEWHERE IN THE LIBRARY. AND IT'S, IT'S, AND IT'S ONLY GOING TO BE OFFERED ONCE, RIGHT? THEY'RE GOING TO MAKE SURE THEY COMMIT TO THAT ONE DAY THAT THE PERSON'S THERE, BUT IT'S GOING TO BE HERE IN TOWN AND IT ALLOWS FOR MORE PART, THEIR WHOLE BOARD OR WHOEVER IS GOING TO BE NEEDING TO BE THERE. AND IT SAVES COST. SO IF WE WANT TO LEAVE THE LANGUAGE ON 8.2 ALONE, THEN I WILL COMMIT TO WORKING WITH OUR HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT AND OUR CITY ATTORNEY AND ARRANGING THAT TRAINING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THAT'S FINE. OKAY, SO 8.2 WILL REMAIN UNMODIFIED, 8.3 PER THE LETTER. THEY DID INDICATE THAT THE THE FINANCIAL AUDIT BEING A SCORE OF C OR HIGHER. WE MODIFIED THAT TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SCORING RUBRIC IS. AND WE WILL ELIMINATE THE ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE THAT SAYS THE FINANCIAL AUDIT MUST IMPROVE EACH YEAR. THAT'S KIND OF AN UNATTAINABLE GOAL. IF YOU GET 100%, YOU CAN'T IMPROVE EACH YEAR. SO SO WE WERE SUGGESTING THE MODIFICATION TO SECTION 8.3. WE'RE SUGGESTING A MODIFICATION TO SECTION 9.2 REGARDING THE LEAGUE RESPONSIBILITIES, WHERE WE WANT TO REQUIRE THEM TO PROVIDE NOTIFICATION IF THEY WITNESS OFFENSES. WE ARE SUGGESTING A MODIFICATION TO SECTION TWO TO ADD IN THE LANGUAGE FOR COMMUNITY FIELD DAYS, AND WE ARE SUGGESTING A MODIFICATION TO SECTION SEVEN, WHICH WOULD INDICATE A 0% FEE FOR YEAR ONE, A 25% FEE FOR YEAR TWO, A 50% FEE FOR YEAR THREE. AND WE ARE RECOMMENDING A MODIFICATION TO SECTION TEN TO HAVE THE TERM BE A THREE YEAR TERM WITH A POSSIBILITY OF A TWO YEAR EXTENSION. AND THEN A DISCRIMINATION CLAUSE. YES. SORRY. YES, THAT WAS THE TOP ONE. AND WE WANT TO ADD A NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE AS WELL. YEAH. AND THEN ALSO IS A IS A CLAUSE ABOUT NOT SUBLEASING NOT BEING ABLE TO SUBLEASE FIELDS TO, TO A FOR PROFIT CLUB. THEN JUST SUBLEASING IT TO ANYBODY BECAUSE THEY'RE, THEY'RE DOING BUSINESS WITH THE CITY. AND THAT'S JUST KEEPS IT CLEAN. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK INSTEAD OF AND YOU CAN DO LIKE MAYBE PARENTHESES, FOR EXAMPLE, CLUBS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK. I DON'T KNOW IF THE COACHES WANT TO RESPOND TO THE SUBLEASING TO THE CLUBS. I KNOW THAT'S BEEN A LARGER DISCUSSION ITEM BEFORE, BUT QUESTION TO THE COACHES. YEAH, YEAH. YOU CAN ASK. I NEED TO STEP AWAY FOR. EL CAMPO. CUANDO LO TIENEN ACTIVO HAN HECHO ANTES ESO A MAS POR EL PARQUE NO NUNCA. NO. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT SUBLEASING SUBLEASING. THEY HAVE SO SO THEY HAVE. THE REASON I HAVE THE LANGUAGE NONPROFIT IS THAT OBVIOUSLY THEIR THEIR 501 C THREE. THEY HAVE TO MAINTAIN THE 501 C THREE. USTEDES POQUITO ES EL DIGAS CLUBS ENTIENDES SE LES LLAMA CLUB COMO VAMOS A PONER JUGAR LANES JUGAR ALIANZA JUGAR EN LA LIGA DE NOSOTROS ES UN CLUB ENTIENDES. ENTONCES CUANDO PARTICIPA CON NOSOTROS QUIEREN REPRESENTAR LA LIGA'S A EN EL NOMBRE DE NOSOTROS ENTIENDES. ENTONCES ESO ES LO Q YO QUIERO USTEDES ENTIENDES ENTONCES CUANDO NO ES UN CLUB ES CUANDO ES SOLAMENTE EL NOMBRE DE LA LIGA. CUANDO ES COS ES SOLO NO MAS REPRESENTA LA LIGA. OTRO NOMBRE. ENTONCES SON CONFUNDIDO CON EL CLUB DE LOS CLUBS SON LOS MAS AFUERA. LOS OTROS. ENTONCES AQUI CLARIFICATION. ESTO. SE ACERCA DE NOSOTROS. POR QUÉ TIENEN A PARTICIPAR CON NOSOTROS Y NOSOTROS. LOS NINOS PARTICIPAN SON LOS QUÉ SE QUEDA CON NOSOTROS Y COMIENZAN A PARTICIPAR COMO SERVICIO. COMO ESTA ES SERVICIO DE NOMBRE. PERO EL CLUB IS IT OPERATING COMO SE. NO ES UN CLUB. EN LA LIGA DE NOSOTROS. ELLOS PUEDEN. AMBAS DIGAS CUANDO LA LIGA'S [02:10:05] POR ESO LLEGO EL SE PUEDE CUIDAR O SE PUEDE ESTAN REGISTRADOS BAJO BAJO EL OR NO CUANDO PARTICIPO CUANDO PARTICIPANT IN TORNEOS COMO NOSOTROS ELLOS PARTICIPAN CON SU NOMBRE PORQUE TAN PARTICIPANDO EN LA LIGA'S A Q TENEMOS AQUI CON USTEDES EN LOS CAMPOS OBLIGATORIOS NO SE CAMBIA NOMBRE, PERO EN LOS FIELDS AQUI POR QUÉ. PORQUE SON COMUNITARIOS CUANDO SON COMUNITARIOS NI YO LA LIGA. TENEMOS LA ACTIVIDAD DE NADIE PORQUE USTED TIENE LAS HORAS COMUNITARIAS LAS HORAS COMUNITARIAS NO PODEMOS QUITAR A UN NINO, UN PADRE NADA Y ELLOS PORQUE SON HORAS COMUNITARIAS Q LA CIUDAD DE 6A8S USTEDES SON LOS RESPONSABLES DE AHI SI TOMAN ANAHI GONZALEZ LA CIUDAD POR ESO SE NECESITA Y DESPUÉS DE LA DIAS. COMO SE ESTA QUEDANDO NOSOTROS SOMOS RESPONSABLES. OTRO TENEMOS Q ES UN ESATTAMENTE. CON CLUB ENTIENDEN LOS CLUBS YA SON MAS GRANDES SON LOS Q Y Q COBRA ARRIBA DE MIL DOLARES POR UN NINO DE. LO GASTON REPORTADO ES Q ESOS CLUBS NO QUINIENTOS MIL DOSCIENTOS DOLARES DE LOS PADRES. GASTON, YOU KNOW THAT TIENEN SUS HIJOS EN ESOS CLUBS ES REPORTADO YO TENGO UN EJEMPLO YO NOSOTROS IN COSTA, NOSOTROS EN COSTA NOSOTROS COMO POR NINO ENTIENDES Y LO Q ES EL PIE. NO SÉ SI TENEMOS LA HORA. TENEMOS LA HOJA DE TODOS LOS EQUIPOS ENTRARON DE LA LIGA. ENTONCES NOSOTROS PAGAMOS Y ESTA LAS CANTIDADES CORRECTA LO ES DE MAS NI DE MENOS LO ES UN JUGADOR Y LOS POR PARTE Q REPRESENTAN A LA LIGA. ES LO CUAL ES. CUANDO LA LIGA DE CLUB HACEN VER ES UN EQUIPO. Y HAY UNA UN BASTANTE DE CONFUSION. NOSOTROS TENEMOS LOS EQUIPOS LLEGAN Y SE ADOPTA UN HOMBRE Y ES UN HOMBRE REPRESENTA DENTRO DEL FORMATO DE NOSOTROS. TENEMOS SI ESTOS NINOS O. FUERA DE LO HACIENDO REC Y QUIEREN PARTICIPAR EN OTRAS MAS FUERTES TIENEN LA ACCION DE TODO. ESTO ES PUBLICO UN LOS EQUIPOS AQUI. EXCUSE ME. CAN I HAVE YOU SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE? PARTICIPANT. COAST SOCCER LEAGUE USTEDES PUEDEN ENTRAR EN LA PAGINA DE WEBSITE YA EL COSTO DE NUESTRO EQUIPO ES QUINIENTOS DOLARES CIENTOS DE DEPOSITO. PAGAR LO TIENEN UNA TARJETA SPECIFICA PARA SUS JUGADORES. POR JUGADOR. ES TODO LO PAGA REPRESENTAN CON EL NOMBRE DE CVSL Y EL NOMBRE RESPECTIVO ADOPTAR. QUINIENTOS DOLLARS COAST SOCCER LEAGUE NO ES NOSOTROS ESTAMOS HABLANDO A LA LIGA VAN A PARTICIPAR ESTA JUEGOS CON DIFERENTES EQUIPOS DE OTRAS CIUDADES DONDE TIENEN LA OPCION A JUGAR EN CASA O JUEGOS DE TODO ESTA EN LA PAGINA DE INTERNET Y LOS EQUIPOS NO PUEDEN SER SOLAMENTE UNDER CVSL MANUEL. SOLAMENTE PARA NO EL PROBLEMA. NO. COACHELLA LLEGAR A UN NINO JUGAR EN UN EQUIPO A CADA QUIEN LOS EQUIPOS SE LOS JUGADORES TIENEN MAS TALENTO. AQUI ES EL TALENTO EN TODO EL VALLE. ENTONCES VAMOS A PONER UN EJEMPLO RICARDO DE UN BUEN EQUIPO Y EL. SUS JUGADORES Y EL SELECCION ENTIENDE EL OTRO NINOS. QUÉ SOBRAN POR SI QUIEREN JUGAR OTRO EQUIPO Y SE HACE OTRO EQUIPO. ENTONCES SE LA SIERRA LA PUERTA NADIE ENTIENDE ENTONCES SON SELECCIONADOS SE HACEN POR ESO POR ESO BASTANTES EQUIPOS ESTAN CONFUNDIDO A LA MEJOR CON EL COBRE. MUCHOS QUINIENTOS DOLARES O LA MEJOR COBRA QUINIENTOS POR NINOS. ESO YO NO SÉ PERO NOSOTROS LO HACEMOS ES ESTO LO LO ES EN LOS COBOS Y LOS PONEMOS Y ES MAS CLARO NO [02:15:07] PODEMOS COBRAR MAS DE ESO NOSOTROS PORQUE YA ESA ABUSO DE DE DE COBRO ES COAST SOCCER. COAST SOCCER SOCCER. YEAH I THINK I SEE YEAH. EL MICROFONO. YOU'RE GOING TO LOWER THE YOU'RE GOING TO FIND A MINIMUM OF THREE DIFFERENT LEAGUES THAT IS OPEN TO OUR AREA. ONCE THEY ADVANCE FROM THAT AREA, IT'S OPEN STATEWIDE. THERE'S THE OPTION FOR THESE KIDS TO GO. THERE IS PATHWAYS FOR THEM TO GO PAST JUST THE CITY LIMITS, PAST THE STATE LIMITS. SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT MOST OF THE COACHES ARE WORKING TOWARDS. AND WHEN RIGHT NOW YOU GUYS ARE CONFUSED WHEN WE SAY CVS SELL AND ADD A NAME, THAT'S THE IDENTITY THAT THAT TEAM IS CHOOSING TO IDENTIFY AS. THAT'S THEIR PRIDE. SO THEY CHOOSE THE NAME, WHETHER IT'S VOTED ON BY THE COACH, THE TEAM, WHATEVER IT IS, THAT'S THE IDENTITY THAT THEY IDENTIFY WITH. IT'S NOT THAT THERE'S A DIFFERENT CLUB OR THERE'S DIFFERENT STUFF THERE AND THAT THE REGISTER, I'M SORRY. SO THEY HAVE TO REGISTER THEIR NAME. NO. WITH SOCCER LEAGUE OR IS IT JUST. NO. THEY REGISTER UNDER CVS. SO WHEN THEY WANT TO REGISTER FOR CVS, THEY COME TO ME AND THEY SAY, WE WANT TO PARTICIPATE. WHAT'S THE PROCESS? I TELL THEM THIS IS THE PROCESS OF WHAT YOU'RE NEEDED. THE COACHES HAVE ARE REQUIRED TO DO CERTAIN CERTIFICATIONS AND CERTAIN THINGS. I GIVE THEM THAT PROCESS. I TELL THEM, THESE ARE THE FEES, THIS IS WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE CHARGED. AND THAT'S ALL THEY THAT THEY DO. OKAY. SO ENTIRELY THEY ARE CVS. SO THEY'RE ALL REPRESENTING CVS. SO WE JUST ADD THEIR OWN IDENTITY TO GIVE THEM THAT, THAT PRIVILEGE OF THAT PRIDE THAT THEY WANT TO HAVE. AND THEN HOW MANY CLUBS, CLUBS, GENUS MANUEL KNOW SOME CLUBS. SI TENEMOS DOS. EQUIPOS ESTA. NO. YEAH. THESE ARE THE TEAMS THAT ARE GOING OUT TO REPRESENT. THEN THERE'S THE TEAMS THAT ARE JUST PLAYING HERE LOCALLY. THERE'S A DIFFERENCE. AND THEN. WHEN PEOPLE SEE. OKAY. SO. SI ESTA. ANTERIORMENTE. NO WE'RE NOT IN SE TODOS LOS NINOS A A PALM DESERT POR ESO NOSOTROS COMO SI LOS PRIMEROS ENTRAMOS A CALCIO ES EN TODO EL CALIFORNIA HICIMOS ES PARA NINOS DE MEJOR NIVEL HICIMOS EQUIPOS DE EQUIPOS DESPUÉS CUENTA DE QUÉ TALENTO HABIAN COACHELLA EMPEZARON A NINOS POR TODOS LOS DOS Y NO HICIERON. MANDAMOS A EQUIPOS NADA MAS Y AHORITA. TENEMOS TODAVIA MANDAMOS POR MEDIO DEL CLUB MANDAMOS SIX PARA QUÉ HAGAN LA COMPETENCIA MAS MAS DE LO DE AQUI JUEGA LOCALMENTE. PERO CLUB CLUB YO SIEMPRE LES VIENEN A JUGAR A SI ESTE SISA Y LOS CLUBS HAN QUERIDO PARTICIPAR AQUI CONMIGO SE VAN AL OTRO LADO PORQUE SI LES PERMITEN A CON EL NOMBRE DE ELLOS. Y YO NO YO DECIA ESTOS SON EQUIPOS DE AQUI Y VAN A REPRESENTAR A LOS COSTOS. ES ESTA DICIENDO QUINIENTOS, PERO LO LO MANDAMOS A. ALSO A SON TREINTA DE REGISTRO DEL NINO E NOSOTROS. PORQUE EL UNIFORM DE CASA Y VISITA NO TIENEN QUÉ. ES GASTO PORQUE YA ESTAMOS TRABAJANDO PARA QQC CON SU LUEGO DE LA LIGA REPRESENTING A LA LIGA. PERO EN REALIDAD ESTE SI NOSOTROS QUEREMOS CAMPOS O MAS CAMPOS DEBEMOS TOMAR EN CUENTA QIQ METER A LOS DE NUESTRA CIUDAD A LOS Q ESTAN DENTRO DE NUESTRAS LIGAS NO PERMITIR Q OTROS VENGAN A TOMAR ESPACIOS Q Q NO PUEDEN TOMAR LOS PORQUE SON DE OTROS CLUBS YO YO NO QUIERO MAS DETALLES, PERO USTEDES USTEDES PUEDEN VER DE AQUI ADELANTE CUANTOS CLUBS IN LAS VEGAS Q POR LO GENERAL [02:20:04] VAMOS A TENER UNO MAS A CLUB Q C COMO EN ESTE TIEMPO SE LES ACABAN LOS JUEGOS E LO HACEN ES BUSCAR LIGAS PARA JUGAR NO PERDON. SI ESTA BIEN. PERO VENGA TODO EL CLUB OCUPA UN LUGAR Q LOS NINOS DE DE DE LAS LIGAS OCUPAN ESO NO ESTA BIEN Q PROPORCIONAR LOS CAMPOS A LOS NINOS DE NUESTRAS LIGAS INCLUYENDO AL TENEMOS CADA LIGA. ASI LOS COSTOS SON BAJOS SON BAJOS OTROS CLUBS. HACER COBRAN MAS DE AHI EN LA PANDEMIA HIZO UNA JUNTAR TODOS LOS TODOS LOS MIEMBROS DE CALCIO NO METEMOS POR EL MISMO PRESIDENTE, DIJO ES UNA TRISTEZA Q ESTAN HACIENDO DINERO CON UN DEPORTE, PORQUE LOS COSTOS DE AQUI EN ESTOS Y LOS DIAS EN PUBLICO Y DICE ES UNA TRISTEZA LOS CLUB VENGAN HACER DINERO SIENDO Q NOSOTROS NO MAS ESTO. Y SI ES PORQUE PODEMOS HACER LOS NINOS COMO YA SE LO ANTERIORMENTE QUIÉNES OCUPAN Y NO PAGAR TANTO NOSOTROS LOS TRES CUATRO NINOS DOS Y LOS DEMAS SON RICARDOS A PERSONAS Q DICE NO TIENE PARA NADA PARA SU REGISTRO ASI. APPLICATION. ENTONCES DE ESA MANERA LES AYUDAMOS A TODOS A Q TENGAN UN DEPORTE ABAJO COSTO Y Q SI DE NUESTRAS PROPIAS LIGA. GRACIAS. THANK YOU. ALGO. TIENE UN LADO AQUI SE LO PONENS EN TODOS LOS EQUIPOS Y MANUEL NO PUEDE SER UN CLUB DE SISA PORQUE NO PUEDE SER COMO SOLAMENTE UN CLUB DE THE SEASIDE. NO ES LA PREGUNTA SI TENEMOS SI ES SI EL PROBLEMA ES SI TAMBIÉN TAMBIÉN ES PERO PUEDE SER SI LOS OTROS. ENTONCES ESO ES UN EJEMPLO. SI SA VALENCIA. CIVIL EL COACHELLA ES LO USTEDES QUIEREN ES EL HOMBRE DE MAS EQUIPOS SIX. O SIX. ES EL PUNTO. ES CUANDO SE REALIZARON CON EL COSTO SOCCER LEAGUE IS CVS ES OR CVS EL EL NOMBRE DEL EQUIPO PORQUE CUANDO VAN INWAGEN VIENEN REPRESENTANDO LA LIGA PERO A JUGAR CON UN EQUIPO. ESTO ES YO ESTOY ANDANDO ENTENDER ESO ES UN EQUIPO Q VAI A COSTO TIENE EL NOMBRE DE SISA CON EL NOMBRE DE SU EQUIPO. QUÉ ELLOS DECIDIERON PORQUE SI NO DE OTRO MUNDO ERAN DOS EQUIPOS DE CUAL ES EL FIN DE LA VERDAD. ES LO Q MIREN ESTA PAGINA ESTA POR ESO SI POR ESO SI PERO UN HABLADO. WHICH KIND OF MAKES IT SEEM LIKE THERE'S OUTSIDE THINGS COMING INTO PLAY TO USE THE FIELD. IT'S VERY CONFUSING ANDREW. I DON'T KNOW DO WE HAVE MOUS FOR EACH LEAGUES MOUS FROM THEIR ORGANIZATION'S MINUTES. ANYTHING THAT KIND OF TELLS US HOW THESE LEAGUES AND ASSOCIATIONS ARE OPERATING. NO, I DON'T HAVE MINUTES FROM FROM THE INDIVIDUAL LEAGUES. I WOULD RECOMMEND ALSO BECAUSE WE THEY ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ANNUAL FIELD USE PERMITS AS WELL. SO POTENTIALLY BECAUSE THIS MOU APPLIES TO ALL OF THE LEAGUES AND THE SUBLEASING ISN'T SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY APPLIES TO THE BASEBALL AND FOOTBALL. PERHAPS A DISCUSSION ABOUT HOW THE DIFFERENT CLUBS AND LEAGUES ARE WORK WITH THEM AND HOW THEY ARE REGISTERED WITH LEAGUES IS SOMETHING THAT WE COULD EVALUATE WITH THEIR FIELD USE PERMIT INSTEAD, AND THAT WAY WE COULD HAVE THOSE KIND OF INDIVIDUAL COMMENTS WITH JUST THE SOCCER LEAGUES, RATHER THAN TRYING TO INCORPORATE IT INTO THE MOU. AND I THINK THAT'S WHAT WE NEED TO DO. ENTIENDO ESPANOL INGLÉS PARA Q YO QUERIA SABER OKAY, WHEN WE HAVE WHEN WE HAVE, YOU KNOW, COMO SEIS EQUIPOS. ENTONCES NO ES UN [02:25:09] EQUIPO SON SIX EQUIPOS Y POR ESO NO PUEDEN ELIMINAR Y TENER ESOS SIX EQUIPOS EN CVS EL. WHEN YOU'RE SAYING SEVEN SEVEN V SEVEN ARE YOU TALKING ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE SEVEN V SEVEN. OR ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT 760. OKAY. THAT'S THE CONFUSION YOU'RE ASKING SEVEN V SEVEN, WHICH IS THE PART OF A COMPETITION THAT WE HAVE AVAILABLE WHERE TEAMS FORM OF SEVEN PLAYERS AND THEY PLAY IN THE FIELD. THIS TEAM THAT'S HERE IS CALLED 760. SO WHEN THEY GO OUT AND REPRESENT THEY ARE CVS AND THEY'RE QUOTE UNQUOTE NAME IS 760 RIGHT. NOT SEVEN V SEVEN. SO I'M NOT I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT 760. I'M TALKING ABOUT SIETE BECAUSE HE'S SAYING THAT THERE'S SIX TEAMS. THAT'S THAT'S THE NUMBER OF TEAMS THAT ARE COMPETING IN THAT SPECIFIC DIVISION. WE HAVE A DIVISION THAT PLAYS SEVEN AGAINST SEVEN. AND THAT'S A SPECIFIC DIVISION THAT HAS SEVEN TEAMS PLAYING THERE. THEY PLAY AGAINST EACH OTHER. OKAY. WE HAVE DIFFERENT DIVISIONS BETWEEN YOUTH, ADULT AND SEVEN V SEVEN AND THE YOUTH SIDES. WE HAVE KIDS THAT ARE BORN, THE U SIX, U FIVE, AND WE USE THOSE ACRONYMS TO IDENTIFY THEM. SO DEPENDING ON THE CATEGORY THAT YOU'RE SPEAKING OF, THAT'S THE NUMBER OF TEAMS THAT WE HAVE IS NOT THAT THEY, WE, WE COULD BUNCH THEM UP TOGETHER AND MAKE THEM. THOSE ARE THE TEAMS THAT ARE PLAYING AGAINST EACH OTHER. AND SO THEN AND THEY'RE ALL LOCAL. AND THEN BECAUSE THEY'RE ONLY SEVEN, THEN THEY COMPETE OUTSIDE REGIONALLY. NO. SO THEY ONLY COMPETE. I THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING FOR CLARIFICATION. WHEN YOU MEAN SEVEN SEVEN B SEVEN. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT. BECAUSE I'M UNDERSTANDING YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A CATEGORY THAT WE HOLD GAMES FOR WITHIN THE LEAGUE. AND THOSE JUST PLAY HERE LOCALLY WITH US. THEY DON'T THEY DON'T FORM TEAMS TO GO OUT AND PLAY OR REPRESENT US IN ANY WAY. THEY JUST PLAY HERE. THAT'S A CATEGORY WITHIN OUR LEAGUE. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OKAY. I THINK YEAH I THINK YEAH. OKAY. SO THANK YOU SO MUCH ANDREW. SORRY. I KNOW WE GOT YOU BACK AND FORTH, BACK AND FORTH. BUT IT IS A GOOD CONVERSATION. I THINK WE HAD A GOOD CONVERSATION. I THINK WE'RE READY TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION. BUT IF YOU WANT TO READ THROUGH THE CHANGES ONE LAST TIME OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS TO ADD AND CHANGE SO THAT WE'RE CLEAR BEFORE. YES. SO I BELIEVE BASED ON THE DISCUSSION WE'VE HAD HERE, THAT WE'D BE LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT 14 WITH THE PARKS AND RECREATION REVISED FIELD ALLOTMENT, PROVIDING THE FIELD THREE ACCESS IN THE SPRING TO CVS. L WE WOULD BE ADDING A SECTION 19 FOR A NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE. WE WOULD BE ADDING WOULD BE MODIFYING SECTION 8.3 FOR THE AUDIT REQUIREMENTS AND DELETE THE REQUIREMENTS TO INCREASE THE SCORE. EVERY YEAR WE WOULD BE MODIFYING SECTION 9.2 THE LEAGUE RESPONSIBILITIES TO REQUIRE NOTIFICATION OF OFFENSES WOULD BE MODIFYING SECTION TWO AND ADDING COMMUNITY FIELD DAYS, COMMUNITY FIELD USE DAYS INTO THE SECTION TWO, WE'D BE MODIFYING SECTION SEVEN REGARDING FEES TO ESTABLISH A 0% FEE FOR YEAR ONE, A 25% FEE FOR YEAR TWO, AND A 50% YEAR FEE FOR YEAR THREE, AND WOULD BE MODIFYING SECTION TEN, WHICH IS THE TERM LIMIT. AND WE WOULD BE HAVING A THREE YEAR TERM WITH A TWO YEAR EXTENSION. ENTERTAIN A MOTION MOTION TO APPROVE. DOES IT FIRST? IS THERE A SECOND? NO. SECOND. OKAY. I'M BROKE. COUNCIL MEMBER DELGADO. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER MARTINEZ. HI. MAYOR PRO TEM PEREZ. YES. AND, MAYOR FIGUEROA, I THANK YOU. AND WITH THAT, WILL I COME BACK ONE MORE TIME FOR FINAL OR IS THIS IT? I BELIEVE SINCE THE MOTION WAS TO APPROVE AMENDMENT 14 WITH THE MODIFICATIONS, THEN IT WOULD NOT NEED TO COME BACK TO COUNCIL. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND I ALSO WANT TO THANK ALL OF OUR LEAGUES FOR THEIR ROBUST CONVERSATION PARTICIPATION. THEY'RE ALWAYS VERY ACTIVE COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND WE APPRECIATE THEIR PARTICIPATION. THANK YOU. OKAY. THAT WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 30, A DISRUPTION POLICY PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 107707. YES. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. SENATE BILL 707 [02:30:03] PROVIDES VARIOUS UPDATES TO THE TELECONFERENCING REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC AGENCIES, CITIES, AND COUNTIES THROUGHOUT THE STATE THAT MEET CERTAIN POPULATION THRESHOLDS ARE REQUIRED AS OF JULY 1ST TO CONDUCT HYBRID MEETINGS WHERE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC CAN PARTICIPATE REMOTELY. AS WE'RE ALL AWARE, THE CITY HAS OBVIOUSLY IMPLEMENTED REMOTE PARTICIPATION FOR QUITE SOME TIME NOW. HOWEVER, SB 707 DOES ALSO REQUIRE THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE AN OPEN SESSION, A POLICY REGARDING ANY POTENTIAL DISRUPTIONS TO THOSE REMOTE SERVICES, AND THIS POLICY IS BEFORE YOU TODAY FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. CONSISTENT WITH THIS LAW, THE POLICY REQUIRES THAT ANY DISRUPTION TO REMOTE SERVICES BE ANNOUNCED IMMEDIATELY AT THAT PUBLIC MEETING. IT ALSO REQUIRES THAT A RECESS BE TAKEN FOR STAFF TO TROUBLESHOOT THE THE ISSUES INVOLVING THAT DISRUPTION. THE RECESS MUST LAST AT LEAST ONE HOUR OR UNTIL THE SERVICES ARE RESTORED, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. IF AFTER THAT ONE HOUR, IT'S DETERMINED THAT THE SERVICES CANNOT BE RESTORED, THEN YOU HAVE THREE OPTIONS. YOU CAN ADJOURN THE MEETING AT THAT TIME. YOU CAN CONTINUE THAT RECESS IN ORDER FOR STAFF TO CONTINUE TO TROUBLESHOOT. IN ORDER TO GET THE REMOTE SERVICES BACK ONLINE, OR YOU MAY CONTINUE WITH THE MEETING. IF YOU DECIDE TO CONTINUE WITH THE MEETING, THERE WILL HAVE TO BE A VOTE. AND WHERE YOU WILL MAKE A FINDING THAT IT IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST TO CONTINUE THE MEETING, WHICH OUTWEIGHS THE PUBLIC INTEREST IN REMOTE PUBLIC ACCESS FOR THAT MEETING. THE POLICY ALSO REQUIRES THAT MEETING MINUTES REFLECT ANY DISRUPTION TO REMOTE SERVICES, AND IT FURTHER PROVIDES PROCEDURES TO REMOVE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO ARE DISRUPTING THAT MEETING. MAYOR, YOU ARTICULATED THAT RULE JUST A COUPLE MEETINGS AGO, BUT IT IS NOW FORMALIZED IN THIS POLICY. IT PROVIDES THAT YOU ARE ABLE TO PROVIDE A WARNING TO ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO IS EXHIBITING DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR. IF AFTER THAT WARNING DISRUPTIONS CONTINUE FROM THAT INDIVIDUAL, THAT INDIVIDUAL MAY BE ASKED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE CHAMBERS OR ONLINE, WHEREVER THEY'RE LOCATED. AND WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? THE ITEM. THIS IS REJECTION ONLY ONLY APPLIES TO OUR SYSTEM, RIGHT? NOT TO THE PUBLIC OUTSIDE HAVING CONNECTION PROBLEMS WITH THE SYSTEM. THAT'S RIGHT. IT APPLIES SPECIFICALLY TO OUR SYSTEM TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR ZOOM IS OPERATIONAL. THANK YOU. OKAY. WITH THAT? I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THIS ITEM. NO, NO PUBLIC COMMENTS. OKAY. OKAY. MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 32ND MOTION IN A SECOND. ROLL CALL. COUNCIL MEMBER DELGADO. YES. COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ. AYE. MAYOR PRO TEM PEREZ, YES. AND MAYOR FIGUEROA. AYE. OH, I LIKE [Public Hearing Calendar (Quasi-Judicial)] TO HAVE A SOUND. OKAY. THE PUBLIC HEARING CALENDAR QUASI-JUDICIAL. ITEM NUMBER 31. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 2026-38. CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CITY OF COACHELLA. LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER ONE THROUGH 40 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026 2027. OKAY. SO JUST A QUICK BACKGROUND ON LMDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED A RESOLUTION. NUMBER 2630 TO INITIATE THESE PROCEEDINGS. SO WE'RE. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS LMD FEES. AND TONIGHT WE ARE LOOKING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2026 S 38, WHICH WILL CONFIRM THE ASSESSMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2627 FOR THE CITY OF COACHELLA. LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS ONE THROUGH 40. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS POSTED IN THE PAPER AS. THIS BEING THE OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. AS FAR AS THE LMDS, WE HAVE 40 LMDS SPREAD THROUGHOUT THE CITY. THESE MAPS ARE INCLUDED IN THE ENGINEER'S REPORT. ONE THING I DID WANT TO [02:35:02] DISCUSS. WE GREEN SHEETED. WE HAD A GREEN SHEET ADDED FOR THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, SO THE SECTION IN RED. THERE WAS A TYPO IN SOME OF THESE. THIS LANGUAGE IS DIRECTLY FROM THE FORMATION DOCUMENTS, SO IT IS A DIRECT. IT'S A DIRECT LANGUAGE FROM THE FORMATION DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE DISTRICTS. I'M NOT JUST PICKING ON DISTRICT NUMBER SIX. THIS LANGUAGE IS ACTUALLY INCLUDED TO ALMOST EVERY SINGLE DISTRICT. AND IT JUST DEFINES THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED. SO THAT'S THE REASON WHY THERE WAS A. THE WHAT'S IT CALLED WHEN WE ADD THE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENT SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. YEAH. THAT'S WHY THERE WAS A SUPPLEMENTAL JUST SO THAT WE COULD CORRECT SOME TYPOS THAT WERE IN THIS SECTION IN EACH OF THE DISTRICT LANGUAGES. SO WITH THAT, WE WOULD REQUEST THAT WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE WE LOOK AT MOTION TO APPROVE. OKAY. WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM NUMBER 31 AT 8:33 P.M. NO PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THAT ONE. IF THERE'S ANYBODY ON ZOOM WHO WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. THERE ARE NONE. SEEING NONE. WE'LL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AT 8:33 P.M. MOVE TO APPROVE. THERE'S A MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND. SECOND. OKAY. ROLL CALL PLEASE. COUNCIL MEMBER. DELGADO. YES. COUNCILMEMBER. MARTINEZ. AYE. MAYOR PRO TEM PEREZ. YES. AND MAYOR FIGUEROA. AYE. THANK YOU. WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 2026-39. AFFIRMING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026 AND AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION OF RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE SERVICES SERVICE CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026 2027 ON THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE'S PROPERTY TAX ROLLS. ANDREW. THE WRONG PRESENTATION. THE PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. ITEM NUMBER 32. I THOUGHT WE DID 31. WE DID 31. THIS IS 32. 30. YEAH. OKAY, I APOLOGIZE. LET'S GO AHEAD AND OPEN 32. OKAY. I'VE ACTUALLY NEVER ACTUALLY WE'VE NEVER USED A PRESENTATION FOR THE TRASH RATES BEFORE. SO THAT'S OKAY. WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITHOUT A PRESENTATION. FOR THE TRASH RATES. THE CURRENT RESIDENTIAL SERVICE IS 36.92. AND WE HAVE A PROPOSED INCREASE OF $1.44 PER YEAR. THE SERVICE COMPONENT PER OUR EXISTING CONTRACT, AND PER THE PROP 218 PROCESS THAT WAS COMPLETED IN 2022, THEY ARE ALLOWED TO INCREASE ON ANY GIVEN YEAR BASED OFF THE PRICE INDEX. THE CPI WITH A MAXIMUM CAP AT 5%. THIS YEAR, THAT NUMBER IS ABOUT 3.9%. THE WAY THEY CALCULATE THAT THERE ARE THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ALLOWS FOR THE RATE ADJUSTMENT ON TWO DIFFERENT COMPONENTS. SO THERE'S THE SERVICE COMPONENT AND THE DISPOSAL COMPONENT. SO THAT COMBINED INCREASE FOR BOTH THOSE COMPONENTS IS $1.44. THE TOTAL INCREASE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL RATE WOULD BE 3836 PER MONTH. AND FOR THE COMMERCIAL SERVICE THERE IS A WHOLE VARIETY OF COMMERCIAL OPTIONS AVAILABLE. BY FAR THE MOST COMMON COMMERCIAL SERVICE THAT WE HAVE IS THE THREE YARD BIN, WITH A PICKUP ONCE PER WEEK. THAT SERVICE CURRENTLY COSTS 205 95, AND THE PROPOSED INCREASE OF 746 WILL BRING THAT SERVICE TO THE 21341 IF YOU HAVE ANY DIRECT QUESTIONS FOR BURRTEC, WE DO HAVE THEM IN THE AUDIENCE, OTHERWISE, THE RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ALLOW PUBLIC COMMENT. OKAY. WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:36 P.M. NO PUBLIC COMMENTS. OKAY. IF THERE'S ANYBODY ONLINE WHO WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. THERE ARE NONE. SEEING NO PUBLIC COMMENT, WE'LL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AT 8:37 P.M. SO WITH NO PUBLIC COMMENTS, THEN [02:40:05] THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2026-39 AFFIRMING THE FISCAL YEAR 2627 SOLID WASTE RATES AND ADOPTING THE REPORT PROPOSING TO COLLECT RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE SERVICE CHARGES ON THE TAX ROLL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2627 AND DIRECT THE CITY CLERK TO FILE SAID REPORT WITH THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER TO PLACE SAID CHARGES ON THE TAX ROLL. ENTERTAIN A MOTION MOTION TO APPROVE. OKAY, SO FIRST. SECOND. OKAY. ROLL CALL PLEASE. COUNCILMEMBER DELGADO YES. COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ. AYE. MAYOR PRO TEM PEREZ YES. AND MAYOR FIGUEROA. YES. MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 33. ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL YEAR ANNUAL BUDGET RESOLUTION 202626-41 AND APPROVAL OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2025 2026. FINAL BUDGET RESOLUTION 2026-42. GOOD EVENING AGAIN, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. TONIGHT WE'RE PRESENTING TWO RELATED ITEMS THE REQUESTED ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2627 AND THE FINAL BUDGET FOR THIS THIS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2526. THIS BUDGET REFLECTS MONTHS OF WORK BY EVERY CITY DEPARTMENT, AND I WANT TO THANK STAFF FOR THEIR DILIGENCE IN PUTTING THIS DOCUMENT TOGETHER. IT IS ALSO BEING SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION AWARD, WHICH SPEAKS TO THE LEVEL OF DETAIL AND TRANSPARENCY BUILT INTO THIS YEAR'S BUDGET. THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE ACTIONS ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, AND IT'S WORTH BEING CLEAR ABOUT THE DISTINGUISHED DISTINCTION UP FRONT. THE FIRST RESOLUTION, 2020 641, ADOPTS THE NEW FISCAL 2627 BUDGET. THIS IS THE SPENDING PLAN FOR THE YEAR THAT STARTS THIS COMING JULY 1ST. THE SECOND RESOLUTION IS 2020 642, AND THAT APPROVES THE FINAL BUDGET FOR THIS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2526, THE YEAR THAT IS CURRENTLY ENDING. AND WE'LL TALK MORE ABOUT WHAT THE SECOND ITEM REALLY IS LATER IN THE PRESENTATION, BECAUSE SOMETIMES IT'S MISUNDERSTOOD. THERE ARE TWO STEPPING BACK TO THE BIG PICTURE ACROSS EVERY FUND, THE CITY MANAGER'S GENERAL FUND, SPECIAL REVENUE, CAPITAL PROJECTS, DEBT SERVICE, AND ENTERPRISE FUNDS. WE ARE BUDGETING 227.7 MILLION IN REVENUES AND 250.3 MILLION IN APPROPRIATIONS. THAT $22.6 MILLION GAP BETWEEN REVENUE AND APPROPRIATIONS LOOKS ALARMING AT FIRST GLANCE, BUT IT IS NOT GENERAL FUND MONEY. IT IS OVERWHELMINGLY DRIVEN BY TWO FUNDS. OUR GRANTS FUND AND OUR CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND, WHICH ARE BUDGETED TO SPEND ON LARGE, ALREADY SECURED FEDERAL GRANT AWARDS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE. THESE INCLUDE BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, LIBRARY, ANNEX AND THE COMMUNITY RESILIENCE CENTER, OR RESOURCE CENTER. THOSE EXPENDITURES ARE MATCHED DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR BY OUTSIDE FUNDING AND NOT BY CITY TAX DOLLARS. WE ALSO CONTINUE TO GOVERN FOR COMPONENT UNITS AS THEIR BOARD THE SANITARY DISTRICT, THE WATER AUTHORITY, THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE POLICE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT. SO THE THE FUND THAT COUNCIL HAS THE MOST DIRECT DISCRETION OVER IS THE GENERAL FUND AND THE GENERAL FUND. WE'RE PROJECTING REVENUES AT 47.4 MILLION AND APPROPRIATIONS AT 47.62 MILLION, WHICH NETS TO A SHORTFALL OF 226,127. I WANT TO FLAG RIGHT AWAY THAT THIS NUMBER, WHILE TECHNICALLY ACCURATE, IS MISLEADING IF READ AS AN OPERATING DEFICIT. AND THAT IS WHAT WE'LL TALK ABOUT ON THE NEXT SLIDE. IN THE MEANTIME, I'LL NOTE THAT OUR RESERVE POSITION REMAINS STRONG. THE COMMITTED CONTINGENCY RESERVE IS 9.8 MILLION, WHICH IS 20.6% OF APPROPRIATIONS AND IS ABOVE OUR 20% COUNCIL POLICY MINIMUM. SO THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SLIDE IN TONIGHT'S PRESENTATION OF THE 47.62 MILLION IN GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS, $534,026 IS NOT AN OPERATING COST. IT IS A TRANSFER OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND TO CAPITAL PROJECTS TO HELP FINANCE CAPITAL INFRASTRUCTURE. WHEN WE SET THAT CAPITAL TRANSFER ASIDE AND [02:45:02] LOOK ONLY AT THE DAY TO DAY OPERATING REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES, THE GENERAL FUND IS ACTUALLY PROJECTED TO RUN A SURPLUS OF APPROXIMATELY 308,000. IN OTHER WORDS, THE CITY'S CORE OPERATIONS POLICE, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS ADMINISTRATION ARE FULLY FUNDED BY ONGOING OPERATING REVENUE, WITH MONEY LEFT OVER. THE REPORTED SHORTFALL REFLECTS A DELIBERATE ONE TIME CHOICE TO DIRECT GENERAL FUND RESOURCES TOWARDS CAPITAL INVESTMENT, DRAWING ON AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE, NOT A STRUCTURAL IMBALANCE IN OUR DAY TO DAY BUDGET. THIS DISTINCTION MATTERS FOR HOW WE THINK ABOUT LONG TERM FISCAL HEALTH AND OPERATING DEFICIT WOULD BE A WARNING SIGN. A CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUNDED FROM HEALTHY RESERVES IS EXACTLY WHAT THOSE RESERVES ARE FOR. SO MOVING TO WHERE OUR GENERAL FUND REVENUE COMES FROM, TAXES ARE BY FAR THE LARGEST CATEGORY, AT 31.5 MILLION. THOSE ARE COMPOSED OF PROPERTY TAX IN LIEU OF VLF, WHICH IS VEHICLE LICENSING FEES, MEASURE USE, SALES TAX, SALES TAX AND UTILITY USERS TAX. WE THEN HAVE TRANSFERS IN AT 11 MILLION AS OUR SECOND LARGEST CATEGORY. THIS IS MOSTLY THE COST OF COST ALLOCATION PLAN. REIMBURSEMENTS FROM WATER AND SANITARY ENTERPRISE FUNDS, PLUS THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES, DISTRICT POLICE ASSESSMENTS. THE REMAINING CATEGORIES ARE RELATIVELY SMALL BUT STABLE CONTRIBUTORS. SO THIS IS OUR GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT. THE POLICE SERVICES REMAINS OUR SINGLE LARGEST GENERAL FUND INVESTMENT AT 14.3 MILLION, OR 30% OF THE TOTAL BUDGET. THIS FUNDS OUR CONTRACTED SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, INCLUDING TWO NEW MOTORCYCLES AND AN ADDITIONAL PATROL OFFICER THAT WAS ADDED THIS YEAR. GENERAL GOVERNMENT IS AT 10.2 MILLION, AND THAT INCLUDES CITYWIDE COSTS LIKE OUR 60% CONTRIBUTION TO THE FIRE PROTECTION, DISTRICT, DEBT SERVICE TRANSFERS AND THE CAPITAL TRANSFERS WE DISCUSSED IN THE PREVIOUS SLIDE. THE REMAINING DEPARTMENTS ROUND OUT THE REST OF THE OPERATING BUDGET. TURNING TO OUR BALANCE SHEET. OUR GENERAL FUND BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30TH, 2025 WAS $42,391,376. THAT BALANCE BREAKS INTO FOUR COMPONENTS NON SPENDABLE 13.1 MILLION REPRESENTS ADVANCES TO OUR DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUNDS AND ISN'T AVAILABLE FOR SPENDING. IT ALSO COVERS ANY OTHER LONG TERM LOANS THAT WE HAVE BETWEEN FUNDS COMMITTED OF 9.8 MILLION. THAT'S OUR POLICY RESERVE THAT WE SPOKE ABOUT A FEW MINUTES AGO. THE ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE IS 7.2 MILLION, AND THAT COVERS PLANNED CAPITAL AND SOFTWARE, SOFTWARE, CARRYFORWARDS AND UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE OF 12.25 MILLION. AND THAT'S WHAT REMAINS AVAILABLE FOR COUNCIL APPROPRIATION. THIS IS A HEALTHY, WELL RESERVED POSITION HEADING INTO THIS NEXT FISCAL YEAR. SO A SUMMARY OF ALL FUNDS. THIS TABLE SUMMARIZES REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS FOR OUR LARGEST FUNDS. YOU'LL SEE THE GENERAL FUND, OUR TWO LARGEST SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS GRANTS AND CAPITAL PROJECTS. AND OUR TWO ENTERPRISE FUNDS, WATER AND SANITARY. THE WATER AUTHORITY HERE COMBINES FUNDS 178 WITH 177, WHICH IS OUR CONNECTION FEE FUND, AND THE SANITARY DISTRICT COMBINES FUND 361 WITH 360, WHICH IS OUR SEWER CONNECTION FEE FUND. WE PRESENT EACH UTILITY AS A SINGLE CONSOLIDATED LINE FOR CLARITY CLARITY CONSISTENT WITH HOW WE REPORT EACH UTILITY'S NET POSITION FOR 2627. SPECIFICALLY, THIS CONSOLIDATION DOESN'T CHANGE THE DOLLAR TOTALS, SINCE CONNECTION FEES ACTIVITY IS ALREADY EMBEDDED IN IN THE ACCOUNTS THIS YEAR, BUT IT DOES AFFECT PRIOR YEAR COMPARISONS ELSEWHERE IN THE WORKBOOK. SO WHAT THAT BASICALLY SAYS IS THAT YOUR, YOUR WATER AUTHORITY AND YOUR SANITARY DISTRICT, THIS IS THE BUDGETARY, WHEN WE GET TO THE END OF THE YEAR AND CLOSE OUT CAPITAL PROJECTS, DEBT SERVICE, THE OVERALL EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES WILL GO DOWN BECAUSE IT GOES STRAIGHT TO THE BALANCE SHEET. BUT AS PART OF THE BUDGET, WE BUDGET LIKE WE WOULD FOR A [02:50:03] GOVERNMENTAL FUND. NUMBERS THREE, SIX ONE AND 178178. SO THE FULL DETAIL FOR ALL OF OUR FUNDS IS ON EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION 2020 641, BUT THERE ARE A FEW HIGHLIGHTS FROM OUR ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS WORTH FLAGGING. OUR WATER AUTHORITY AND SANITARY DISTRICT ARE BOTH BUDGETING NET CAPITAL INVESTMENT THIS YEAR, FINANCED THROUGH STATE REVOLVING FUND LOANS AND GRANTS RATHER THAN RATE INCREASES. THOUGH, I WANT TO FLAG THAT THERE IS A PROP 218 RATE PROCEEDING FOR BOTH UTILITIES ANTICIPATED LATER THIS YEAR TO ADDRESS LONG TERM INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS, INCLUDING CHROMIUM SIX COMPLIANCE, WHICH IS AN UNFUNDED STATE MANDATE. I ALSO WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THE NET INCOME FIGURE SHOWN HERE, BECAUSE THEY'RE CALCULATED DIFFERENTLY THAN THE GENERAL FUND DEFICIT WE DISCUSSED EARLIER, THESE ARE FULL ACCRUAL GAAP BASIS FUNDS, SO THEY NEED TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR A LITTLE DIFFERENTLY. THE STANDARD THE CITY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS USED FOR ENTERPRISE FUNDS. ON THAT BASIS, THE WATER AUTHORITY IS PROJECTED TO POST A NET LOSS OF ABOUT 1.68 MILLION THIS YEAR, WHILE THE SANITARY DISTRICT IS PROJECTED TO POST A NET INCOME OF ABOUT 1.36 MILLION. THOSE ARE IN LINE WITH THE RATE STUDY DATA THAT WE HAD EARLIER THIS YEAR. THE DIFFERENCE FROM THE BUDGETARY APPROPRIATION NUMBERS COMES DOWN TO ACCOUNTING TREATMENT. CAPITAL OUTLAY GETS CAPITALIZED AS AN ASSET RATHER THAN EXPENSE, AND DEBT. PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS REDUCE A LIABILITY RATHER THAN COUNT AS AN EXPENSE UNDER FULL ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING. THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BUDGET IS FULLY BALANCED BETWEEN THE GENERAL FUND 60% TRANSFER AND THE DISTRICT'S OWN PROPERTY TAX AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES, DISTRICT ASSESSMENT REVENUE AND OUR GRANTS FUND REFLECTS 66 MILLION IN FEDERAL INFRASTRUCTURE AWARDS, INCLUDING RES NBILSTBGP AND TCC GRANTS, ALL FULLY MATCHED BY THE AWARDING AGENCIES. WITH NO GENERAL FUND SUBSIDY REQUIRED. NOW LET'S TURN TO THE SECOND ACTION TONIGHT. RESOLUTION 2020 642. APPROVING THE FISCAL 2526 FINAL BUDGET. I WANT TO SPEND A MOMENT HERE BECAUSE THIS ITEM IS OFTEN MISUNDERSTOOD. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST TO APPROVE NEW SPENDING. EVERY ADJUSTMENT REFLECTED IN THIS FINAL BUDGET ALREADY CAME TO COUNCIL INDIVIDUALLY AS A SEPARATE ITEM AT THE TIME IT WAS NEEDED DURING THE FISCAL YEAR, WHETHER AS IT WAS A GRANT ACCEPTANCE, A CONTRACT AMENDMENT OR DURING THE MID-YEAR APPROPRIATION PROCESS. WHAT THIS RESOLUTION DOES DO IS CONSOLIDATE THOSE MANY SEPARATE DECISIONS INTO A SINGLE FORMAL YEAR END RECORD. IT SATISFIES GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSING OUT THE FISCAL YEAR AND GIVES OUR AUDITORS A CLEAN, COUNCIL APPROVED FINAL BUDGET TO RECONCILE AGAINST FOR THE UPCOMING ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT. THINK OF IT AS THE CITY'S VERSION OF CLOSING THE BOOKS, A RATIFICATION OF DECISIONS ALREADY MADE, NOT A NEW DECISION IN ITSELF. FOR THE NUMBERS THEMSELVES. THE 2526 GENERAL FUND REVENUES. THE FINAL BUDGET CAME IN WITH REVENUES AT 40.58 MILLION, AGAINST EXPENDITURES OF 40.87 MILLION FOR A REPORTED NET LOSS OF 289,001 20. APPLYING THE SAME OPERATING VERSUS CAPITAL LENS WE USED FOR NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET, 232,908 OF THAT GAP WAS GENERAL FUND TRANSFER TO THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND. BACKING THAT OUT, THE ADJUSTED OPERATING RESULT IS A LOSS OF 56 TO 12. SO ESSENTIALLY BREAK EVEN. WITH THAT SAID, I THINK WE'RE GOING TO COME IN A LOT BETTER THAN THAT. I RAN THE NUMBERS TODAY, AND THE GENERAL FUND CURRENTLY AS OF TODAY, SHOWS A 1.4 MILLION NET INCOME. IT IS OBVIOUSLY GOING TO CHANGE BETWEEN NOW AND WHEN WE KNOW WHERE THE NUMBERS WILL MATERIALLY END UP AT THE END OF AUGUST. BUT I DO BELIEVE WE'LL LIKELY COME IN BETTER THAN PROJECTED. I THINK ONE QUESTION WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT THOSE PROJECTIONS, ARE YOU I KNOW THAT YOU COME AT MID-YEAR. ARE YOU ABLE TO? I KNOW THAT WE MEET AS A COUNCIL INDIVIDUALLY WITH THE CITY MANAGER. IF YOU'RE ABLE TO GET THOSE UPDATES AND YOU CAN LET HIM KNOW SO THAT WHEN WE MEET WITH HIM, HE CAN GIVE US AN UPDATE. LIKE THIS IS WHERE THE GENERAL [02:55:02] FUND IS. AND IT'S A GOOD LITTLE PINPOINT, LIKE I MET WITH LINCOLN AND THIS IS WHERE WE'RE AT BECAUSE THAT THAT NET INCOME, RIGHT, POTENTIALLY CAN END UP GETTING DECREASED. YEAH. BECAUSE OF SPENDING OR. YEAH. SO WE'VE NOW GOTTEN THE MAJORITY OF OUR PROPERTY TAX. BUT IN JULY AND AUGUST WE'LL STILL GET SALES TAX, TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX. SEVERAL OTHER MONIES THAT COME IN THAT ARE FOR MAY AND JUNE ALSO FOR WORK THAT'S PERFORMED THROUGH JUNE. WE'LL BE PAYING THOSE INVOICES IN JULY AND AUGUST, AND THAT WILL AGAIN REDUCE THAT NET INCOME. SO IT'S HARD TO SAY EXACTLY WHERE WE'LL LAND. ONE THING I WILL SAY IS THAT THERE WAS A CAPITAL CARRYOVER FROM 2425 INTO 25, 26 OF $2 MILLION FOR AVENUE 52. SO IF THAT TRANSFER NEEDS TO BE DONE TO PUT THAT IN THERE, THAT WILL REDUCE ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE. SO EVEN IF IT CAUSES A NET LOSS, THE OPERATING NET INCOME WILL STILL BE OPERATING NET INCOME BECAUSE IT WAS ASSIGNED IN A PRIOR YEAR. BUT ACROSS BOTH FISCAL YEARS, THE THE CONSISTENT STORY IS THE SAME. OUR CORE OPERATING BUDGET IS ESSENTIALLY BALANCED, AND THE REPORTED SHORTFALLS ARE DRIVEN BY DELIBERATE CAPITAL INVESTMENT, NOT OVERSPENDING. SO LOOKING AHEAD, A FEW ITEMS ON THE HORIZON THAT COUNCIL SHOULD BE AWARE OF. WE ANTICIPATE INITIATING PROP 218 RATE PROCEEDINGS FOR BOTH WATER AND SANITARY LATER THIS YEAR. THOSE PROCEEDINGS WILL BE A SEPARATE, NOTICED PUBLIC PROCESS. CHROMIUM SIX COMPLIANCE REMAINS A SIGNIFICANT UNFUNDED MANDATE, CURRENTLY ESTIMATED AT 50 TO 70 MILLION. WE'RE HOPING TO OFFSET A SIGNIFICANT CHUNK OF THAT THROUGH GRANT OR LOAN FORGIVENESS, AND WILL REQUIRE A DEDICATED LONG TERM FINANCING STRATEGY THAT WILL BRING BACK TO COUNCIL AS IT DEVELOPS. ON A POSITIVE NOTE, OUR LEGACY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BONDS FULLY RETIRE BY 2034, WHICH WILL RELEASE MORE THAN 3 MILLION PER YEAR. THAT IS CURRENTLY GOING TO THE RPTF PROPERTY TAX DISTRIBUTION BACK TO THE CITY. SO THAT WOULD BE A MEANINGFUL STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENT TO OUR LONG TERM GENERAL FUND POSITION. AND FINALLY, AS MENTIONED AT THE OUTSET, THIS BUDGET DOCUMENT IS BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION AWARD. IN SUMMARY, WE RECOMMEND THAT CITY COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION 2020 641 APPROVING THE 2627 REQUESTED ANNUAL BUDGET AND ADOPT RESOLUTION 2020 642 APPROVING THE FISCAL 2526 FINAL BUDGET. ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? I KNOW THAT THIS IS ALSO A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, CORRECT? OH YES IT IS. IT IS CORRECT. YEAH. SO I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:55 P.M. WE DO HAVE A COMMENT. JAMES RODRIGUEZ, MR. RODRIGUEZ, WELCOME. GOOD EVENING COUNCIL JAMES RODRIGUEZ. LUCKILY, WHAT LINCOLN HAS DESCRIBED TO US AND WHAT HAS HAPPENED FOR THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS IS THAT IT'S A PROJECTED LOSS OR DEFICIT, AND THEN IT ALL BALANCES OUT. THE PROBLEM IS, IS THAT THE ONLY THING THAT THE CITIZENS HERE OR THE RESIDENTS HERE IS DEFICIT, NOT THE BALANCE OUT AFTERWARDS. SO WE WANT TO DO A BETTER JOB OF LETTING PEOPLE KNOW AS MUCH AS THEY FIND OUT ABOUT A DEFICIT, THAT WE'RE NOT IN A DEFICIT. WHEN EVERYTHING IS SAID AND DONE AND IT'S ALL COMPLETED AND VERIFIED. HOWEVER, THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT OUR CURRENT BUDGET DOESN'T HAVE ISSUES. AND THE, YOU KNOW, THE BIGGEST ONE THAT WE SEE IS THE MISSED OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT THE SHERIFF'S CONTRACT, BECAUSE AS THAT SLIDE JUST SHOWED, WHEN YOU HAVE ONE AND A HALF TIMES YOUR OPERATION, THAT'S IF YOU HAD A BUSINESS AND EVERYTHING IT COSTS YOU TO RUN YOUR BUSINESS. YOU HAD TO PAY 150% OF THAT TO JUST YOUR SECURITY TEAM. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THAT SLIDE JUST TOLD US. IT'S LIKE $10 MILLION VERSUS $15 MILLION FOR THE OPERATIONAL GOVERNMENT COSTS OF OUR ENTIRE CITY VERSUS A FEW OFFICERS IN OUR CURRENT CONTRACT. I DON'T EVEN KNOW THE EXACT NUMBER, BECAUSE WE ONLY EVER REALLY SEE THE FULL EFFECT OF THAT CONTRACT WHEN THERE ARE MASSIVE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE THAT ARE CALLED AND SAID, YOU KNOW, WE NEED WE NEED TO CROWD DISPERSAL OR WE NEED SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THAT'S THE ONLY TIME [03:00:01] I REALLY SEE THE EFFECT OF, YOU KNOW, THAT AMOUNT OF PEOPLE WORKING. SO THAT'S AN ISSUE. THAT'S A HUGE ISSUE. AND I KNOW, YOU KNOW, WE WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT IT AND I KNOW THAT WE HAVE A WONDERFUL ABILITY AS CITIZENS, AS RESIDENTS, AS AS WORKERS OF ANY BUSINESS, OF ANY FACILITY TO HELP IMPROVE IT, TO GIVE OUR BEST OPTIONS TO HELP IMPROVE THAT STRUCTURE, ESPECIALLY IF WE HAVE ANY KNOWLEDGE OF HOW IT CAN BE IMPROVED. SO LET'S LET'S REALLY DOUBLE DOWN AND FOCUS ON THAT SHERIFF'S CONTRACT. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE PLEASE, PLEASE THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? IS THERE ANYONE ON ZOOM? WHO WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS ITEM? PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. THERE ARE NONE. SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT AT 8:58 P.M. THANK YOU. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL DISCUSSION. LINCOLN. IS OUR BUDGET BETTER OFF NOW THAN IT WAS IN 2025? AT THE BEGINNING, THE BUDGET FOR 2025 SHOWED THAT WE WERE GOING TO HAVE A NET LOSS OF $5 MILLION. 5.1 WE CAME IN AT ABOUT 1.9 MILLION NET LOSS, ALTHOUGH WE HAD THAT 2 MILLION CARRY FORWARD FOR THE AVENUE 52. AGAIN, THAT'S A CAPITAL PROJECT TRANSFER. SO IF THAT IMPACTS US THIS YEAR, IT WOULDN'T BE INCLUDED IN OPERATING NET INCOME. IT WOULD BE A IT'S ALREADY AN ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE, SO IT WOULDN'T IMPACT OUR UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE OR OUR CONTINGENCY RESERVE OR ANYTHING. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? I HAVE A COMMENT FOR THE BUDGET THAT'S FINANCIALLY HEALTHY AS, LIKE MR. RODRIGUEZ SAID, YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT IN A DEFICIT AND IT LOOKS REALLY HEALTHY. MY QUESTION IS ON NUMBER SEVEN. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS AN ASSIGNED $12 MILLION. IT SAYS AVAILABLE FOR COUNCIL APPROPRIATION. UNASSIGNED. UNASSIGNED. YEAH. SO UNASSIGNED A GOOD TARGET IS 25% IS REALLY HEALTHY. AND SO OUR APPROPRIATIONS WERE 47 MILLION. SO 25% OF THAT WOULD BE ABOUT 12 MILLION, 12.5 MILLION. SO OKAY, IT IT IS MONEY THAT IF COUNCIL WANTED TO UNDERTAKE A LARGE CAPITAL PROJECT AND HAVE A GENERAL FUND CONTRIBUTION, THAT WOULD BE AT COUNCIL'S DISCRETION. WHAT ABOUT USING THE MONEY TO PURCHASE THE BUS FOR THE SENIORS? OBVIOUSLY, THAT'S ALSO UP TO COUNCIL DISCRETION. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? NO, I JUST THINKING I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK THIS YEAR AND MAKING SURE THAT WE HAD AN ENDING NET OPERATING INCOME AND ADDITIONALLY ALSO THE PROJECTED FOR 2026 AND 2027, YOU KNOW, TO, TO KUDOS TO YOU FOR EVERYTHING THAT YOU'VE TAKEN ON. ADDITIONALLY, THE STR PROGRAM AND ALL THE OTHER ADDITIONS THAT WE'VE ADDED TO YOU. YOU'VE DONE AN OUTSTANDING JOB IN THAT FINANCE DEPARTMENT. SO I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR COMMITMENT AND, AND EVERYTHING THAT YOU'VE DONE OVER THERE, ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I DO HAVE ONE OTHER COMMENT. WE WILL BE IN JULY WITH THE MR. ROMO COMING ON AS THE NEW CITY MANAGER. WE ARE RELOOKING AT SOME OF THE STAFFING CHANGES. SO WE'LL BE BRINGING A THE EMPLOYEE CHANGES AS A SEPARATE ITEM TO THE SECOND MEETING IN JULY. HOPEFULLY WE'VE DONE A BACK OF THE NAPKIN CALCULATION AND IT SHOULDN'T HAVE A BIG FISCAL IMPACT ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. IT SHOULD BE IMMATERIAL. YEAH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, THANK YOU LINCOLN. THIS IS VERY EASY. YOU PUT IT YOU PUT IT IN A WAY WHERE ANYONE CAN UNDERSTAND IT. EVEN IF YOU DON'T KNOW ACCOUNTING. IT'S IT'S DONE REALLY WELL FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO READ AND UNDERSTAND. SO I THINK THAT'S WHAT'S IMPORTANT. RIGHT. AND TALKED ABOUT IT. AND I THINK I'M EXCITED TO SEE WHAT YOU'LL DO WITH THAT NEW GOV TOOL BECAUSE IT'LL, IT'LL MAKE IT EASIER. SO YEAH. SO WITH THAT, ENTERTAIN A MOTION, THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. I'LL GO AHEAD. MOTION DOES ARE FIRST SECOND SECOND. ROLL CALL PLEASE. COUNCIL MEMBER. DELGADO. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. MARTINEZ. AYE. MAYOR PRO TEM PEREZ. YES. MAYOR FIGUEROA I. MOVE ON. AND THEN NOW WE'LL MOVE ON TO REPORTS AND REQUESTS. THANK YOU. [Reports and Requests] LINCOLN COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. ANY COUNCIL HAVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS AT THIS TIME. I'D LIKE TO BRING THAT MOTION TO USE THE AVAILABLE COUNCIL FUNDS FOR TO [03:05:06] PURCHASE THE BUS FOR THE SENIORS. OKAY, SO I THINK WE HAD ALREADY GIVEN DIRECTION. WE HAVE. YEAH. TO BRING THREE QUOTES FOR US TO DECIDE ON WHICH QUOTE TO APPROVE, TO PURCHASE THE BUS. SO THAT WAS MENTIONED AT LAST LAST COUNCIL MEETING. ANYTHING ELSE? COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ? NO. CAN WE PAINT THE BUILDING OUTSIDE? IT'S PEELING. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS NOTICED THAT. YOU KNOW, EVERY TIME I WALKED IN THERE'S PAIN COMING OFF. SO WE HAVE KIDS, YOU KNOW, RUNNING AROUND. THEY MIGHT PICK UP THE PAINT AND START CHEWING ON THEM. SO WE'LL BE NICE TO JUST SCRAPE IT OFF AND JUST PAINT IT. WE CAN LOOK AT IT TO SEE WHAT THE SCHEDULE LOOKS LIKE, BECAUSE I THINK IT IS SCHEDULED FOR THAT MAINTENANCE. BUT I WILL TALK WITH ANDREW TO SEE WHERE WE'RE AT ON THAT. THANK YOU. AND I JUST WANT TO THANK ANGELA FOR INVITING ME OVER TO THE BLUE ZONES PROJECT. THAT WAS VERY INTERESTING. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. COUNCILMAN. YEAH. I WOULD LIKE TO BRING FORWARD A POLICY IN REGARDS TO COUNCIL MEMBERS RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT PER 2.10 .030 OF OUR ORDINANCE. THE MAYOR HAS AN ELIGIBILITY SECTION, WHEREAS COUNCIL SEAT DOES NOT. SO I WOULD LIKE TO BRING A POLICY FORWARD THAT HAS REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENCY FOR OUR COUNCIL MEMBERS. THANK YOU.E WHO'S RUNNING. YOU WANT TO MAKE A POLICY THAT THE INDIVIDUAL RUNNING FOR A CITY COUNCIL SEAT IS A RESIDENT OF THE CITY? YES. AND THAT THEY'VE BEEN HERE FOR THAT IS A THAT IS CURRENT LAW. THAT'S A REQUIREMENT. IT'S JUST THAT THE IN THE MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE, IT'S NOT WRITTEN DIFFERENT. SO I THINK IT'S JUST TO TO CLEAN IT UP BECAUSE IT'S. I KNOW THAT IT'S LAW, BUT THE MUNICIPAL LAW. WE'LL UPDATE THE THE CODE SECTION. YEAH. THE MUNI CODE DOESN'T MATCH. SO. AND RYAN, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, THAT POLICY ALREADY IDENTIFIES A PERCENTAGE OF TIME. SOMEBODY NEEDS TO BE AT THAT RESIDENCE. IT NEEDS TO BE THEIR PERMANENT RESIDENCE. BUT DOES IT STATE THAT THEY HAVE TO HAVE LIVED A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME WITHIN THE CITY? THAT DOES NOT. SO I WOULD LIKE TO BRING SOME SOMETHING FORWARD WITH THAT. OKAY. WE CAN WE'LL DISCUSS. OKAY. WE'LL WORK ON THAT. I ALSO SEE THAT COUNCILMEMBER DELGADO, YOU BROUGHT UP THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE ORDINANCE, SO I'VE GOT THAT DOWN FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. THANK YOU. THERE'S A THERE'S A FEW THINGS NOT SO MUCH TO BRING BACK AS POLICY, BUT NOW THAT WE HAVE THE FULL SENIOR CENTER COMMITTEE THAT WE THAT WE SET A DATE AND TIME TO HAVE THOSE MONTHLY. AND THEN HOPEFULLY, MAYBE WE CAN START WITH THE FIRST COMMITTEE MEETING NEXT WEEK IF COUNCILMEMBER BECOMES AVAILABLE. AND THEN ALSO IS TO BRING BACK THE CREATION OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE TO RENEW THE HEALTH POLICY IN THE GENERAL PLAN. AND THEN WE'RE BRINGING BACK THE NEPOTISM POLICY AND THE SPONSORSHIP GRANTS. ON THE NOVEMBER 8TH MEETING. AND THEN THE REACH. JAMES I, I SUPPORT CREATING A DATE AND TIME, A SET DATE AND TIME. YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO, WHEN YOU DO YOUR YOUR APPLICATION FOR YOUR PERMIT, YOU'LL SET THE DATE AND TIME. AND THEN ANDREW WILL SEE IF THERE'S AVAILABILITY FOR THOSE DATES. AND THEN YOU GUYS CAN WORK IT OUT. I HAVE ALREADY CONFIRMED IT THOUGH, AND THAT IS AVAILABLE FOR THE JULY, AUGUST, SEPTEMBER, OCTOBER. I WILL BE REACHING OUT TO HER DEPENDING ON COUNCIL'S DECISIONS. WONDERFUL. AND THEN WITH THE WAIVER, WITH THE WAIVER OF OF FEES, WHAT SO COULD WE DO THE THE THE WAIVER OF FEES OR WOULD WE DO THAT MAYBE LIKE A SPONSORSHIP? AND THEN I THINK THAT I THINK THAT MIGHT BE EASIER. RIGHT. THIS I, I, I THINK TO ADD TO THAT, I KNOW YOU'RE GOING TO BRING BACK. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY JULY, JULY 8TH, RIGHT? NOT NOVEMBER 8TH. RIGHT. OKAY. JULY, JUST TO CLARIFY TO JULY 8TH, I HAVE A COMMENT ON THAT. DO WE HAVE A CODIFIED, CODIFIED FEE WAIVER POLICY? NO, I SAW THAT IN TODAY. WE WE APPROVED A. THE AUTISM WALK. AND I'M WONDERING IF THERE WAS LANGUAGE IN THAT STAFF REPORT THAT SAID THAT WE SHOULD HAVE MAYBE LIKE A STANDARDIZED FEE WAIVER APPLICATION FOR WHEN IT COMES TO THAT. SO MAYBE LOOKING AT THE LANGUAGE THAT THEY USED IN THAT STAFF REPORT FOR WHEN AN ORGANIZATION WANTS TO, YOU KNOW, WHAT DOES THAT PROCESS LOOK LIKE? AND, AND OF COURSE, YOU KNOW, WHAT DOES THAT POLICY LOOK LIKE? SO I THINK THERE WAS SOME LANGUAGE IN THERE THAT ONE OF THE STAFF MEMBERS USED IN [03:10:03] THEIR STAFF REPORT. AND I DID LIKE THAT LANGUAGE THEY USED ON THERE. SO WE COULD BRING BACK A STANDARD POLICY ON THAT. AND I KNOW THAT A LOT OF CITIES ARE LOOKING AT ALSO SPONSORSHIPS IN GENERAL IN TERMS OF WHEN PEOPLE NEED TO SUBMIT SO THAT WE CAN BUDGET APPROPRIATELY FOR IT, AND ALSO WHAT PERCENTAGE YOU WOULD ALLOW, FOR INSTANCE, THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE PERHAPS A CERTAIN DOLLAR AMOUNT PER YEAR, ANYTHING ABOVE THAT WOULD HAVE TO GO TO COUNCIL. BUT WE CAN BRING FORWARD A POLICY FOR YOU ON THAT AS WELL. AND SO I DON'T MIND DOING THE SPONSORSHIP FOR $1,000 NORMALLY. THE THE SPONSORSHIP FOR FOR $1,000, IF THAT WILL BE WAIVING FEES AND IF THAT PROVIDES, YOU KNOW, REFRESHMENTS OR WHATEVER ELSE YOU KNOW, YOU GUYS NEED. I DO APPRECIATE YOU COMING FORWARD, JAMES, AND PUTTING THIS TOGETHER. I THINK THIS IS A HEALTHY WAY OF COMMUNICATING BETWEEN COUNCIL AND AND THE COMMUNITY. SO I DO FULLY SUPPORT THIS. I THINK THIS IS A GREAT WAY OF US COMMUNICATING. YEAH, I THINK I THINK THAT'S IT. I THINK CURRENTLY, GUS, WHAT WE HAVE FOR FOR THE FEE WAIVERS IS THAT IF YOU'RE A NONPROFIT, YOU'RE QUALIFY. AND THEN I THINK, BUT BUT FOR CERTAIN INSTANCE, WHEN THERE'S COMMUNITY EFFORTS, I THINK THAT WE CAN ALSO LOOK AT WAIVERS FOR THOSE INSTANCES. YEAH. RIGHT. OKAY. AS FOR FUTURE ITEMS, I'M I WANT TO BRING BACK MR. CITY MANAGER, THE CRATE CRATE. TOM KRATOM. THAT'S WEIRD. THERE'S A I'M GETTING THE MODEL ORDINANCE FROM CVAG. SO I'LL COPY ON THAT. AND I WANT TO WORK WITH ONE OF THE LOCAL COMMUNITY MEMBERS THAT ACTUALLY KIND OF STARTED A MOVEMENT WITH THEIR CLASS AND, YOU KNOW, MISS, MISS, MISS ZAPATA, IVAN ZAPATA. SO REACHING OUT TO HER TO GET THAT THAT BECAUSE I THINK, YOU KNOW, AS WE MOVE FORWARD, YOU KNOW, I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE A GOOD ORDINANCE. LA QUINTA DID IT. AND I THINK JUST REALLY LOOKING AT HOW DO WE PROTECT PEOPLE FROM FROM ACCESS TO THOSE AND MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE LOOKING OUT FOR OUR COMMUNITY SO THAT AND I'LL SEND YOU THAT INFORMATION ON. AND THAT'S THE ONLY ITEM THAT I HAVE FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. PERFECT. THANK YOU. AND THEN WE'LL MOVE ON TO COUNCIL COMMENTS, REPORT MISCELLANEOUS COMMITTEES. MR. COUNCILMAN MARTINEZ NO. NOTHING. NO. YOU HAVE COMMITTEE. SO YOU NOW I HAVE COMMITTEE. NOW YOU'LL BE ABLE TO YOU ASSIGNED ME LIKE HOW MANY? FIVE. YOU HAVE FIVE THERE. BUT MOST OF THEM ARE AS NEEDED. AS NEEDED. OKAY. YEAH, EXCEPT THE TRANSPORTATION ONE. THAT ONE WOULD BE GOOD FOR YOU. SO. OKAY. AND THEN, COUNCILMAN DELGADO. NO, I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO REPORT. I THINK I COVERED THAT IN ALL THE POLICY INSTRUCTIONS THAT I PROVIDED. COUNCILMEMBER PEREZ, I DID ATTEND THE HOMELESS COMMITTEE, AND THERE WAS DISCUSSION ON HOW THEY'RE WORKING WITH SEVERAL CITIES ON HELPING OUR HOMELESS POPULATION, NOT JUST WITH HOMELESSNESS, BUT ALSO WITH MENTAL HEALTH AND DRUG ADDICTION, WHICH GO HAND IN HAND. THEY ARE ALSO WORKING WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT HAS A MOBILE TRAILER. I THINK IT'S KIND OF BEEN SCARING OUR HOMELESS POPULATION BECAUSE THEY PROBABLY THINK THAT IT'S A PROBATION CHECK, BUT THEY'RE ACTUALLY OFFERING SHOWERS AND HAIRCUTS. SO THEY'VE GONE TO A COUPLE OF CHURCHES WHERE THEY PARK AND THEY OFFER. OUR HOMELESS POPULATION THE SHOWERS AND HAIRCUTS. SO IF YOU GUYS SEE THEM, PLEASE LET THEM KNOW. IT'S NOT THAT THEY'RE DOING A PROBATION CHECK, IT'S JUST THAT THEY'RE OFFERING SERVICES TO THEM. HOPEFULLY THEY CAN NOTIFY US SO THAT MAYBE WE CAN PUT OUT A FLIER AND THEY KNOW WHERE THEY CAN GO TO, YOU KNOW, WHEREVER THEY'RE PARKED AT. I ALSO ATTENDED MY FIRST PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMITTEE. I LEARNED A LOT THERE. I WAS GLAD TO HEAR THAT THEY'RE ACTUALLY INVOLVING OUR YOUTH. THEY HAVE SCHOOLS GOING OUT TO THE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. I DID MENTION THAT I'D LIKE TO SEE OUR COACHELLA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL AND DESERT MIRAGE BE PART OF THAT, BECAUSE THERE IS A LOT OF KIDS THAT DON'T REALIZE HOW MANY CAREER OPPORTUNITIES ARE ACTUALLY AVAILABLE TO THEM. I KNOW THAT DESERT MIRAGE OFFERS OR THEY THEY HAVE BEEN OFFERING A AVIATION COURSE, AND I HOPE THAT THEY CAN ACTUALLY PARTNER WITH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMITTEES ALSO TO HAVE THEM GO THERE. I WANT TO THANK ALL STAFF AHEAD OF TIME, BECAUSE I KNOW THAT THE JULY 2ND IS GOING TO BE OUR 4TH OF JULY EVENT. I KNOW THAT OUR NATION IS WALKING THROUGH A VERY HEAVY, CHALLENGING TIME RIGHT NOW, AND THAT MAYBE CELEBRATING PEOPLE AREN'T IN THE SPIRIT AND CAN FEEL AFFECTED BY IT, BUT WE SHOULD BE GRATEFUL THAT WE LIVE IN THIS COUNTRY. I WANT TO THANK ALL THOSE WHO SERVED IN THE MILITARY, THOSE WHO PAID THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE, AND THOSE WHO ARE CURRENTLY SERVING AND PROTECTING OUR FREEDOM. SO HOPEFULLY EVERYBODY ENJOYS THEIR 4TH OF JULY. IT'S A SAFE ONE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU STAFF FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK. THANK YOU. AND I JUST DO A QUICK. I ATTENDED THE ACTUAL. ME AND COUNCIL MEMBER MARTINEZ WENT TO THE SENIOR CENTER FATHER'S DAY CELEBRATION. WE HAD A FUN DAY. WE HAD A COOL DANCING. THEY RAFFLED OFF A 55 INCH TV JUST IN TIME FOR ALL THE SOCCER [03:15:07] GAMES. SO THAT WAS REALLY FUN AND JUST LOOKING FORWARD TO THE, YOU KNOW, 4TH OF JULY IS IT'S 250 YEARS OF OF CELEBRATING AMERICA. AND I THINK WE HAVE TO PUT ASIDE WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THE WHITE HOUSE AND EVERYWHERE ELSE IN DC AND IN THE IN THE NATION. YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER THE WHY THE NATION WAS BORN AND THE PURPOSE OF THE OF THE NATION. RIGHT. AND WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THAT UNDERSTANDING OF, OF, OF EVERYONE THAT LIVES IN AMERICA. AND IT'S, YOU KNOW, IT WAS A COUNTRY FORMED BY IMMIGRANTS. IT'S STILL A COUNTRY WITH IMMIGRANTS. BUT THE THE NATIVE PEOPLE WERE HERE FIRST. AND WE HAVE TO UNDERSTAND WHO WAS HERE FIRST AND WHO CALLED THIS LAND HOME FIRST. AND I THINK THAT'S ALSO IMPORTANT BECAUSE WITHOUT, YOU KNOW, THE WHOLE MELTING POT THAT THE US IS AND WE WOULDN'T HAVE A LOT OF THIS STUFF. SO I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT. LOOKING FORWARD TO THE FIREWORKS. COUNCILMEMBER DELGADO SAYS WE HAVE THE BEST FIREWORKS IN TOWN AND LOOKING FORWARD TO SEE EVERYONE THERE ON THURSDAY. AND THANK YOU TO THE STAFF. AND WE DID RECEIVE AN EMAIL FROM VISIT GREATER PALM SPRINGS. I'LL FORWARD IT TO YOU GUYS. THEY'RE DOING A, THEY'RE WORKING WITH A, WITH A, WITH A VENDOR DOING A, DOING ONE ON ONE INTERVIEWS. SO I'LL MAKE SURE THAT THEY INCLUDE YOU IN THOSE ONE ON ONE INTERVIEWS SO THAT YOU CAN GIVE US SOME INPUT ON THAT FOR THE VISIT GREATER PALM SPRINGS. JPA AND WITH THAT, WE'LL TURN IT OVER TO DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS REPORTS. ANY UPDATES ON DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS? YES, WE HAVE TWO REPORTS. ONE OF THEM IS FROM OUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, SELENA, AND THIS WILL BE A REPORT ON THE BUS PURCHASE. YEAH. PERFECT TIMING. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. JASON IS JUST GOING TO POP UP. JUST A ONE SLIDE VISUAL FOR US. SO I JUST WANTED TO GIVE EVERYONE A QUICK UPDATE REGARDING THE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE IN OUR TCC PROGRAM. THE INITIATIVE CALLED COACHELLA PROSPERA. AND I WANT TO GO A LITTLE. I WANT TO REVIEW A LITTLE BIT OF THE HISTORY JUST SO THAT OUR PUBLIC CAN UNDERSTAND THE PROGRAM. SO IN 2023, THE CITY SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION TO THE STRATEGIC GROWTH COUNCIL FOR THE TRANSFORMATIVE CLIMATE COMMUNITIES IMPLEMENTATION GRANT PROGRAM, AND THE CITY WAS AWARDED $22.125 MILLION TO IMPLEMENT A MYRIAD OF PROJECTS AND PLANS ACROSS A SPECIFIC PROJECT PROJECT AREA WITHIN THE CITY OF COACHELLA. AND AS YOU ALL KNOW, THIS INITIATIVE IS CALLED COACHELLA PROSPERA. THE APPLICATION INCLUDED AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES PROJECT. AT THE TIME OF THE APPLICATION, THE PROJECT WAS CALLED THE SIXTH STREET SENIORS APARTMENTS, 53 UNITS IN DOWNTOWN COACHELLA. THE PROJECT HAS NOW BEEN RENAMED CASA SIENNA, AND THIS MUST INCLUDE A SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION OPTION. PER THE GUIDELINES STIPULATED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES GRANT PROGRAM REQUIRES THAT WHEN YOU HAVE HOUSING THAT YOU COUPLE IT WITH A TRANSPORTATION OPTION. SO AFTER CONDUCTING EXTENSIVE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT, RESIDENTS ELECTED TO UTILIZE THE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION BUDGET ALLOCATION TOWARDS THE PURCHASE OF A SHUTTLE BUS THAT WOULD TRANSPORT SENIOR CITIZENS LIVING AT CASA SIENNA APARTMENTS AND OTHER SENIOR CITIZENS TO KEY DESTINATIONS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. SINCE THE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION COMPONENT IS PART OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT, TCC WILL ALLOW THE CITY TO PURCHASE THE SHUTTLE BUS ONCE CASA SIENNA IS BUILT AND OCCUPIED. THE PROJECT IS ANTICIPATED TO BE OPEN BY OCTOBER 2027. TCC IS CURRENTLY REVIEWING THE CITY'S REQUEST TO PRE-PURCHASE A SHUTTLE BUS PRIOR TO THE OPENING OF CASA SIENNA APARTMENTS, IN AN EFFORT TO ADDRESS THE IMMEDIATE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF OUR SENIORS. SO RIGHT NOW, IT LOOKS LIKE TCC STAFF MIGHT GET BACK TO STAFF IN ABOUT TWO WEEKS. THEY DID STIPULATE TO STAFF THAT, YOU KNOW, TCC GUIDELINES ARE REQUIRING A ZERO EMISSION BUS OR A ULTRA LOW EMISSION DIESEL BUS PURCHASE, AND NOT A CLEAN, NATURAL GAS VEHICLE. SO STAFF IS CURRENTLY WORKING ON OBTAINING A NEW PRICE. QUOTE, SINCE THE PREVIOUSLY OBTAINED QUOTE WAS FOR A CLEAN UP GAS BUS, THE TCC STAFF ALSO INDICATED THAT, YOU KNOW, DEPENDING ON WHAT WE FIND IN OUR RESEARCH, YOU KNOW, IF THE QUOTES ARE INFEASIBLE, MEANING BECAUSE I DID ARTICULATE THAT POINT TO THEM, THAT, YOU KNOW WHAT, ELECTRIC VEHICLE BUSSES ARE MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE. AND I DON'T HAVE FAST CHARGERS IN OUR [03:20:03] CITY. I ONLY HAVE ONE THAT WE THAT WE OWN. THE REST THAT EXIST ARE PROBABLY AT TOWER MARTS AND JUST OTHER SPACES IN THE CITY THAT WHERE THE PRIVATE SECTOR INSTALLED, YOU KNOW, THE CHARGERS. AND SO I ARTICULATED TO THE TCC STAFF THAT, YOU KNOW, A, AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE BUS SOUNDS FANTASTIC, EXCEPT IT COULD BE MORE EXPENSIVE. AND THEN ALSO I DON'T HAVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE TO CHARGE IT QUICKLY, SINCE THIS BUS WOULD BE TRAVELING 50 MILES A DAY, YOU KNOW, IT'S GOING TO BE EXTENSIVELY USED. SO SO THEY WERE VERY CONSCIENTIOUS AND THEY SAID, YOU KNOW WHAT, PLEASE MAKE THE EFFORT TO LOOK INTO AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE, ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE BUS OR A ULTRA LOW EMISSION DIESEL BUS. LOOK AT THAT. AND IF IT COMES BACK WHERE IT'S TOTALLY JUST NOT EVEN FEASIBLE, YOU KNOW, WE MIGHT CONSIDER YOUR CLEAN NATURAL GAS OPTION. BUT OF COURSE, THEY TOLD US, PLEASE DON'T. WE'RE NOT TRYING TO CREATE LIES OR FALSE PROMISES. SO, YOU KNOW, THEY JUST KIND OF TOLD TOLD US TO, TO KIND OF WAIT AND SEE, YOU KNOW, WAIT FOR A RESPONSE. AND SO THE REASON THAT I WANTED TO GIVE EVERYONE THIS BACKGROUND IS SO THAT PEOPLE CAN ALSO UNDERSTAND, YOU KNOW, THAT, YOU KNOW, THE CITY HAS DONE EVERYTHING IT CAN TO REALLY BE VERY CARING FOR THIS SPECIAL POPULATION. AND WE HAVE TRIED VERY HARD TO SECURE TRANSPORTATION THROUGH THIS GRANT PROGRAM. AND SO IT'S JUST, AGAIN, GOING BACK TO REITERATE THAT ONE SMALL POINT, YOU KNOW, THAT THE PROJECT THAT THE HOUSING AND THE BUS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT, RIGHT? AND SO, SO AGAIN, WE, WE ARE THE VOICES HAVE BEEN HEARD AND WE ARE JUST HOPING THAT THEY CAN AUTHORIZE THE PRE-PURCHASE OF THE BUS. SO THAT'S THE, THE STATUS THAT WE HAVE FOR YOU. AND SO ANDREW AND HIS TEAM ARE GOING TO GET REAL BUSY LOOKING FOR THE OTHER OPTIONS. AND THEN THEY'LL BRING IT BACK. SO WE'LL HAVE THREE KIDS. AND SELENA, I THINK ONE THING YOU AND I HAD SPOKEN ABOUT, AND ULTIMATELY, IF THE CITY WERE TO USE ITS OWN FUNDS TO GET THE BUS NOW, THEY WOULD NOT GET REIMBURSED FOR THAT. THAT'S CORRECT. THE FACT THAT WE HAVE THESE GRANT MONIES. YES. BUT AT THIS POINT WE'RE TRYING TO SEE IF THEY WILL GIVE US THE FUNDS AHEAD OF TIME. SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT IS BEING WORKED ON. YES THAT'S CORRECT. WE ARE WORKING TOWARDS THAT PRE-PURCHASE AUTHORIZATION AND BUT IT'S GOING TO BE CONTINGENT ON SO MANY POINTS. BASICALLY, I NEED THOSE OTHER TWO QUOTES AND THEN WE'LL SEE WHAT THE PRICING COMES IN AT. AND THEN WE CAN, YOU KNOW, MAKE AN ASSESSMENT AND WE'LL DEFINITELY BRING IT BACK TO COUNCIL JUST, YOU KNOW, FOR FOR YOUR INFORMATION. AND I'M REALLY HOPING THAT THE BEST OPTION THAT WE GET THAT CLEAN NATURAL GAS BUS, BECAUSE THAT'S REALLY THE BEST. AND SO, AND ONCE AND FOR ALL, OUR SENIORS WILL GET THEIR BUS. AND, YOU KNOW, BEFORE THE APARTMENTS OPEN UP. SO THAT THAT WOULD BE IDEAL. AND I DID INVITE THE TCC PEOPLE TO REVIEW THE VIDEO FOOTAGE, JUST SO THEY KNOW THAT, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE ARE ARTICULATING NEEDS. SO, YOU KNOW, SO THAT THEY'RE NOT THINKING WE'RE FABRICATING, YOU KNOW, STORIES HERE. SO, SO THEY, THEY ARE AWARE. ANY QUESTIONS? NO THANK YOU. SELENA, THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK. BECAUSE WHEN YOU'RE DONE. YES. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK. I KNOW IT'S A LOT. I KNOW THANKS TO YOU AND YOUR TEAM, WE HAVE A LOT OF OUR GRANT FUNDING AND SO FORTH. SO THANK YOU. I DO APPRECIATE YOU COMING AND EXPLAINING TO US THE BUS ISSUE BECAUSE I WASN'T I DIDN'T QUITE UNDERSTAND. I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT WAS HAPPENING. SO THANK YOU. YES. THANK YOU. SO SELENA, IF WITHIN THE TWO THE TWO WEEKS, IF WE IF WE IF TCC SAYS, YOU KNOW, WE CAN'T, WE CAN'T DO THE PRE-PURCHASE BECAUSE WHEN WE SUBMITTED THE, THE PLANS FOR THE SENIOR COMMUNITY, YOU KNOW, WE EMBEDDED THE TRANSPORTATION PORTION OF IT. SO IF THEY'RE SAYING THAT WE CAN'T, YOU KNOW, AMEND THAT LANGUAGE TO ALLOW THEN A PRE-PURCHASE, THEN THAT WE MOVE FORWARD THEN AND EXPLORE QUOTES TO THEN PURCHASE THE BUS, YOU KNOW, WHETHER THAT'S, YOU KNOW, WHETHER THAT'S A BRAND NEW BUS OR A BUS THAT MIGHT BE A YEAR OLD. THEY DID TELL US TODAY THAT, YOU KNOW WHAT? SO LET'S SAY OUR PRE-PURCHASE REQUEST IS NOT GRANTED. WHAT WILL BE GRANTED IS THE ABILITY TO PURCHASE IT BETWEEN SIX MONTHS, YOU KNOW, SO JANUARY 2027 AHEAD OF THE APARTMENTS IN OCTOBER. SO IF WE DON'T GET THE PRE-PURCHASE AUTHORIZATION, WE STILL, WE STILL WOULD BE LOOKING AT A [03:25:02] AUTHORIZATION FOR JANUARY OF 2027. YEAH. SO I THINK, I MEAN, I THINK THAT'S A GOOD DIRECTION TO MOVE FORWARD. AND HOPEFULLY WE'LL BE ABLE TO TAKE CARE OF THIS, THIS CONCERN. AND IT'S KIND OF GROWN OVER THE LAST YEAR. AND SO I THINK PEOPLE ARE VERY FRUSTRATED. AND, YOU KNOW, WE'RE SEEING IT WHEN THEY COME FORWARD. AND SO, YOU KNOW, I'M I'M HOPING THAT THAT SGC, YOU KNOW, ALLOWS US TO DO THAT PRE-PURCHASE THAT WOULD HELP US A GREAT DEAL BECAUSE TO SOME, TO SOME DEGREE, THE, THE SENIORS THAT WOULD BE USING IT COULD POSSIBLY THEN BE USED OR LIVING IN THE SENIOR COMMUNITY, WHICH I THINK WOULD STILL MAYBE WITHIN THAT, WE CAN CAREFULLY. THEN HOPEFULLY SGC WOULD CONSIDER IT. YES, THEY REALLY LIKED OUR PLAN FOR THE USE OF THE FUNDING BECAUSE WE HAD TO DEVELOP A PLAN ON, YOU KNOW, LIKE THE ROUTE AND HOW MANY DRIVERS AND ALL THIS GOOD STUFF. AND SO WE WERE ABLE TO KEEP EVERYTHING WITHIN BUDGET. SO THE PROJECTED USE OF THE BUS OR THE SHUTTLE WOULD BE THREE YEARS, BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT'S REQUIRED WITH THAT'S A REQUIREMENT OF HCD WITH THE HSC PROJECT. AND SO WE WILL HAVE SUNLINE BUS VOUCHERS AVAILABLE AS WELL FOR EVERY UNIT IT'LL BE ASSIGNED. THERE'S GOING TO BE TWO PASSES. I BELIEVE IT'S TWO PASSES ASSIGNED PER UNIT AND THEN FOR THREE YEARS. AND THEN WE'LL HAVE THE THE, THE BUS SHUTTLES THAT WILL RUN A ROUTE IN THE CITY. AND, AND THERE WILL BE, THERE'S GOING TO BE LIKE PICKUPS AND DROP OFFS AND ALL THAT GOOD STUFF. AND IT WILL INCLUDE THE SENIOR CENTER. AND SO THIS WAS REVIEWED WITH THE, THE SENIOR CENTER STAFF AND, AND ALSO SOME OF THE SENIORS THAT HAVE BEEN VERY VOCAL ABOUT ALL OF THIS. WE'VE SHARED THAT WITH THEM SO THAT THEY CAN SHARE IT WITH THE OTHER SENIORS. AND SO PEOPLE CAN UNDERSTAND THAT, YOU KNOW, THIS ROUTE IS GOING TO BE AMAZING, AND IT'LL RUN THREE DAYS A WEEK. AND THEN OUR OTHER DRIVER THAT WE HAVE NOW, HE'LL SUPPLEMENT OBVIOUSLY, AND TAKE ON THE ROUTE AS HE ALREADY DOES FIVE DAYS A WEEK. BUT THERE'S GOING TO BE THIS SERVICE IN ADDITION TO WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE, AND THE GRANT WILL PAY FOR THAT. AND THEN COMING BACK, CAN WE BRING THE ITEM TO LOOK AT THE REST OF THE SERVICES THAT WE'RE PROVIDING THE SENIOR CENTER AND EXPLORE? YOU KNOW, ANY MAYBE CONVERSATIONS THAT THEY'VE BEEN HAVING? I THINK THAT ONCE WE INITIATE THIS FIRST COMMITTEE MEETING, I THINK THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO GET MORE. COMMUNICATION AND FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS IF WE'RE NOT PROVIDING THEM ALREADY. YEAH. UNDERSTOOD. WE'LL DO. YES. THANK YOU. I'M SORRY. I DO HAVE A QUESTION JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, BECAUSE I KNOW THAT THE SENIORS HAVE BEEN COMING A LOT AS WELL. AND JUST WHAT HAS BEEN SAID, IT'S STILL NOT CLEAR IF THIS IS GOING TO REPLACE THIS SITUATION WITH THE BUS THAT'S CONTINUOUSLY GETTING BEING BROKEN DOWN AND AND LEAVING THEM STRANDED IN THE HEAT. IS THIS GOING TO REPLACE ALL OF THE ALL OF THAT TRANSPORTATION FIVE DAYS A WEEK THAT THEY CURRENTLY GET SO CURRENTLY. SO THE PLAN WITH THIS BUS SHUTTLE, IT IS TO, TO PICK UP THE SENIORS THAT GO TO THE SENIOR CENTER SO THAT IT IS INCLUDED. AND SO, YOU KNOW, OUR HOPE IS THAT THIS WILL BE THE BUS, YOU KNOW, THE BRAND NEW BUS THAT EVERYBODY USES. AND SO THAT IS OUR HOPE TO DECOMMISSION THOSE OLD ONES AND JUST HAVE THIS ONE. YES. OR IF PEOPLE NEED TO USE THE OTHER ONES FOR SOME REASON, THEY'RE GOING TO BE AVAILABLE. BUT I KNOW ANDREW'S TEAM IS WORKING VERY HARD AND REALLY MAKING THIS MAJOR REPAIR. AND I THINK ANDREW KNOWS WHAT WAS THAT CALLED, THE REPAIR THAT THEY'RE DOING RIGHT NOW TO THE OTHER BUS REPAIRING THE LEAF SPRING. THE LEAF SPRING. YEAH. AND SO, SO THEY'RE DOING THAT RIGHT NOW. AND OUR FLEET MECHANIC OR MANAGER, I'M SORRY, I THINK HE INDICATED THAT THERE SHOULDN'T BE ANY MORE ISSUES OTHER THAN NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR. AND SO BECAUSE I WAS LIKE, OH MY GOD, I DON'T, I DON'T WANT THE BUS TO BE BREAKING DOWN LIKE THAT. SO, SO HE WAS LIKE, OH NO, NO, NO, NONE OF US WANT THE BUS TO BREAK DOWN. AND SO THEY'RE, THEY'RE ADDRESSING THE BIG ISSUE RIGHT NOW. AND SO IT SHOULDN'T BE, YOU KNOW, BROKEN. IT SHOULDN'T BE BREAKING DOWN UNLESS THERE'S SOME NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR ITEM. AND BUT HE'S, HE, HE REALLY BECAUSE WE, WE ALSO HAD TO PROVIDE A LIST TO SGC. JUST SO YOU GUYS KNOW HOW EXTENSIVE THIS PROCESS IS ABOUT ALL THE O AND M, ALL THE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE. LIKE, WHEN ARE YOU DOING THE OIL CHANGES? WHAT ARE YOU DOING ABOUT TIRES? WHAT ARE YOU DOING ABOUT. SO ALL OF THAT SCHEDULE HAD TO BE SENT TO THEM. AND SO THAT'S THE SAME SCHEDULE THAT ANDREW'S TEAM FOLLOWS FOR THE [03:30:04] REST OF THE FLEET. AND SO THEY'RE TAKING EXTRA CAUTION, YOU KNOW, TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYTHING IS ADDRESSED SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE ANOTHER BUS BREAKDOWN BECAUSE THAT THAT REALLY IS UNFORTUNATE. AND WE DON'T WANT OUR SENIORS TO BE LEFT IN THE HEAT OR HAVE AC CONDENSATION FALLING ON THEIR HEADS OR ANY OF THAT. SO ONE LAST, ONE LAST COMMENT. SELENA, CAN YOU SEND AS WELL? ACTUALLY, IF THE FLEET MANAGER CAN PROVIDE US OR SEND US AN EMAIL OF THE HISTORY OF WHEN THE THE BUSSES HAVE BROKEN DOWN AND THEN WHICH BUS HAS BROKEN DOWN? BECAUSE WHEN WE HEAR THAT THE BUS IS BROKEN DOWN, WE DON'T, YOU KNOW, I CAN'T SPEAK TO IT. AND SO LIKE, WHICH OF THE THREE, WHICH OF THE THREE BROKE DOWN AND, AND THE DATE SO THAT WE HAVE THAT INFORMATION SO THAT IF WE'RE ASKED, WE CAN HAVE A RESPONSE TO IT. OKAY. SO MAYBE ANDREW CAN PROVIDE THAT UPDATE SINCE I DON'T THEY DON'T REPORT TO ME, BUT I CAN, I CAN DEFINITELY ASK, HEY, CAN YOU PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHEN, YOU KNOW, WHEN A BUS BROKE DOWN OR, AND THEN WHAT'S THE SCHEDULE LIKE? SO THE EMAIL JUST IN AN EMAIL IN AN EMAIL. OKAY. AND I THINK THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING, THAT'S WHAT I HAD REQUESTED THAT WE, WE BE NOTIFIED OF, OF WHAT HAPPENS. SO JUST THE CHRONOLOGY OF REPAIRS OVER THE LAST WELL, EVER SINCE YOU RECEIVED THE BUSSES. CORRECT. AND IF THERE'S FURTHER BREAKDOWNS THEN THAT WE THEN GET AN UPDATE AN EMAIL. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH, WE CAN DO THAT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I ALSO HAVE I'D LIKE TO OUR CITY ATTORNEY TO GIVE JUST A QUICK UPDATE ON THE TIMELINE FOR THE MORATORIUM EXTENSION AND ALSO THE DATA CENTER BAN. SO I JUST WANT ULTIMATELY FOR YOU TO KNOW HOW THAT'S PROGRESSING. OKAY. THANK YOU. YES. MAYOR AND COUNCIL, AT OUR NEXT COUNCIL MEETING ON JULY 8TH, WE WILL BE BRINGING BACK AN INTERIM ORDINANCE TO EXTEND THE MORATORIUM. AS YOU'LL RECALL, UNDER THE URGENCY ORDINANCE, IT'S 45 DAYS, SO WE'RE EXTENDING IT OUT THE FULL YEAR. ASSUMING YOU APPROVE, THAT'S COMING BACK AT OUR NEXT MEETING. IN REGARDS TO THE PERMANENT DATA CENTER BAN, A PERMANENT ORDINANCE THAT IS SCHEDULED TO GO BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION ON JULY 15TH. IT WILL THEN COME FOR FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING ON AUGUST 12TH, AND THEN SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ON AUGUST 26TH. SO THAT DOES REQUIRE, I KNOW, FOR US TO TO MEET TWICE IN AUGUST, BUT THAT IS THE MOST ACCELERATED SCHEDULE FOR US TO MOVE FORWARD, BOTH IN KEEPING THE MORATORIUM IN PLACE, AS WELL AS BRINGING FORWARD A PERMANENT DATA CENTER BAN. THANK YOU. I DO WANT TO THANK YOU, RYAN, FOR FOR TURNING THIS AROUND AND BEING ABLE TO BRING IT FORWARD QUICKLY. I KNOW WE'RE LOOKING AT SEPTEMBER. AND SO THAT THE FACT THAT THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY TO BRING IT IN AUGUST, WE'RE ALL APPRECIATIVE OF THE FAST TURNAROUND. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS FOR RYAN ON THIS ITEM? IF NOT, THEN WE HAVE ONE MORE CITY MANAGER COMMENTS. YES, MAYOR. COUNCIL, I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT IT'S BEEN A WONDERFUL WEEK, A GOOD START. YOU KNOW, I STARTED ALREADY LOOKING AT EVERYTHING EVEN TWO WEEKS BEFORE I STARTED, AND I WANTED TO JUST HIT THE GROUND RUNNING. AND ULTIMATELY IT WAS A LOT OF MEETINGS LAST WEEK. AND THOSE CONTINUE. AS YOU KNOW, WE'VE HAD OUR ONE ON ONES WITH THE DIRECTORS, SO I'VE ESTABLISHED STANDING MEETINGS WITH THEM AND I'VE REACHED OUT TO YOU AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR RESPONDING WITH ONE ON ONES WITH YOURSELVES. SO THAT'S TURNED OUT VERY WELL. I THINK I'VE HAD A CHANCE TO MEET WITH ALL OF YOU. IF WE NEED TO CHANGE THAT SCHEDULE, LET LET ME KNOW. DEFINITELY FLEXIBLE ON THAT. SO FOR THE FIRST WEEK MEETING ALL THE STAFF, IT WAS A WONDERFUL EXPERIENCE TRYING TO GET TO KNOW EVERYBODY. OF COURSE, IT IS DIFFICULT TO GET TO KNOW EVERYBODY SO QUICKLY. SO WHAT I'M PROPOSING IS A YEARBOOK FOR THE STAFF. I'VE SEEN THIS IN OTHER COMMUNITIES WHERE WE HAVE A BOOKLET IDENTIFYING THE PICTURE AND THE NAME AND TITLE OF EACH EMPLOYEE. SO WHENEVER SOMEBODY STARTS, THEY'RE GIVEN A YEARBOOK AND THEY'RE ABLE TO PUT THE NAME IN THE PICTURE TOGETHER VERY QUICKLY. SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT AND IT'S NOT VERY COSTLY. JESSICA TORRES, OUR PIO ASSISTANT, IS ALREADY LOOKING INTO THAT. I'M ALSO GOING TO HAVE AN ALL HANDS MEETING NEXT WEEK WITH STAFF. I'M GOING TO HAVE IT IN TWO DIFFERENT OCCASIONS JUST IN CASE STAFF CAN'T MAKE ONE, THEY CAN MAKE THE OTHER. SO AGAIN, MY WHOLE IDEA IS TO MEET THE STAFF, GET TO KNOW THEM, FIND OUT THEIR NEEDS, YOU KNOW WHAT THEY ASPIRE TO BECOME, THEIR SUCCESSION PLANNING, ALL OF [03:35:03] THAT. SO I'M REALLY EXCITED TO BE YOUR CITY MANAGER AND TO CONTINUE THIS GOING ON. SO AFTER SIX DAYS OR 60 DAYS, I SHOULD SAY, I'LL COME BACK AND REPORT TO YOU WHAT I'VE DONE OVER THOSE TWO MONTHS. SO THANK YOU. WONDERFUL. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER ANYTHING OF THAT SYSTEM? ON ADJOURN AT * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.