[Call To Order] [00:00:11] 6 P.M. OKAY, COMMISSIONER. ORDORICA. IS GOING TO. DO WE PROCEED WITH THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE? YES, PLEASE. ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. SO, CHAIR, JUST REALLY QUICK, I. SO WE HAVE A NEW COMMISSIONER HERE IN THE AUDIENCE. AND AND I, I DON'T KNOW, I THOUGHT I THOUGHT SHE WAS ALREADY SWORN IN, BUT APPARENTLY SHE HASN'T GOTTEN SWORN IN YET. SO WE WILL HAVE HER AT THE NEXT MEETING, HOPEFULLY. BUT YES. OH SHE'S NOT. OH YES. THAT'S WHY I WAS LIKE, WELL, SHE CAN COME UP, BUT SHE'S NOT SWORN IN YET. KENDRA JUST LET ME KNOW. SO ANYWAYS, BUT WE DO HAVE A QUORUM TODAY, THANKFULLY, SO PROCEED AS USUAL. BUSINESS AS USUAL. THANK YOU. PERFECT. THANKS FOR JOINING US. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. SO ROLL CALL PLEASE. ADRIAN'S GONNA BE ASSISTING ME WITH THIS MEETING TONIGHT. SO ADRIAN IS GOING TO DO ROLL CALL AND SOME OF THE OTHER ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. AWESOME. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER ORDORICA. PRESENT COMMISSIONER FONSECA, PRESENT CHAIRPERSON. LADA. PRESENT VICE CHAIR TORRES, COMMISSIONER MURILLO AND ALTERNATE COMMISSIONER ANDRES WOULD BE ABSENT. OR. OKAY, SORRY. OKAY. VICE CHAIR TORRES AND COMMISSIONER MURILLO ABSENT. OKAY, SO THE NEXT ITEM IS THE [Approval of Agenda] APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. AT THIS TIME, COMMISSIONERS MAY ANNOUNCE ANY ITEMS BEING PULLED FROM THE AGENDA, CONTINUE TO ANOTHER DATE OR REQUEST THE MOVING OF AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA. MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA? I'LL MOVE FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. I'LL SECOND THAT. COMMISSIONER ORDORICA. YES. COMMISSIONER FONSECA. YES. CHAIRPERSON. LATTA. YES. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. MOVING ON TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES, WE [Approval Of The Minutes] WILL NOW CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 20TH, 2026. ARE THERE ANY CORRECTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION? NO, NO. MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES? I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. THE MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 20TH, 2026. I MEAN, NOT FOR TODAY. JUNE 17TH, 2026. ALL RIGHT. I SECOND SORRY, COMMISSIONER FONSECA, YOU WOULD BE MOTIONING TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM MAY 20TH. SORRY, FROM MAY 20TH, 2026, I APOLOGIZE. SO I WAS READING THAT, BUT THEN I'M LIKE, AM I READING THAT RIGHT? OKAY, SO ROLL CALL, VOTE COMMISSIONER. YES. COMMISSIONER. FONSECA YES. AND CHAIRPERSON LATTA. YES. ALL RIGHT. SO WE'RE IN COMMUNICATION. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF? THERE ARE NONE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. PUBLIC COMMENT. SO WE WILL NOW OPEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON MATTERS WITHIN THE COMMISSION'S JURISDICTION THAT ARE NOT LISTED ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE MINUTES AND THE TIME IS 604. THERE ARE NONE ONLINE. OKAY. ANY ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? OKAY, SO I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS AT 604. REPORTS AND REQUESTS. DO WE HAVE ANY REPORTS OR REQUESTS FROM STAFF? THERE ARE NONE. ALL RIGHT. [Public Hearing Calendar (Quasi-Judicial)] THANK YOU. AND NOW WE'RE MOVING TO PUBLIC HEARING. SO ITEM NUMBER TWO, A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION NUMBER 2020 617 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COACHELLA FOR THE RECOMMENDATION OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL. APPROVAL OF A NUMBER 2513 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 3360 SQUARE FOOT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ACCESSORY BUILDING [00:05:04] TO SERVE THE EXISTING BUSINESS. EVERHART EQUIPMENT, LOCATED AT 8610 AVENUE 54 AND THE APPLICANT IS STEVE EVERHART. OKAY. AND WE DO HAVE A PRESENTATION BY PLANNING TECHNICIAN VANESSA SANCHEZ MESA. GOOD EVENING, CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS AR NUMBER 25-13 EVERHARD MAINTENANCE BUILDING. FOR BACKGROUND, THE APPLICANT IS STEVE EVERHART. THE CITY APPLICATION DATE FOR THIS PROJECT WAS RECEIVED OCTOBER 9TH, 2025. THE EXISTING USE ON THE PROPOSED PROJECT SITE IS VACANT. THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION IS URBAN EMPLOYMENT. ZONING IS E URBAN EMPLOYMENT AND THIS ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW IS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 3360 SQUARE FOOT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ACCESSORY BUILDING SERVING THE SOUTHERN PARCEL BUSINESS. EVERHART EQUIPMENT. FOR BACKGROUND. ON OCTOBER 5TH, 2022, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COACHELLA APPROVED RESOLUTION NUMBER PC2022-23 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A FREESTANDING IDENTIFICATION SIGN FOR THE EXISTING AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL BUSINESS, EVERHART EQUIPMENT, ON SEPTEMBER 6TH, 2023, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED RESOLUTION NUMBER PC2023-23 FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FREESTANDING ITEM IDENTIFICATION SIGN. AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL, THE PROJECT WAS REQUIRED TO ENSURE TEMPORARY BANNERS AND OVERGROWN WEEDS ALONG THEIR STREET FRONTAGE AREAS ARE TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE FINAL SIGN OFF BY THE CITY OF THE FREESTANDING SIGN. LOOKING INTO THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS PROPOSING TO INSTALL THREE STORAGE CONTAINERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS. IT WOULD BE ANCHOR ANCHORING ALL THE CONTAINERS TO THE GROUND AS SPECIFIED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLANS, AND INSTALLING TWO FACTORY BUILT STEEL ROOF STRUCTURES STRUCTURES ON TOP OF THE CONTAINERS PER BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. EXISTING PAVEMENT WOULD BE PROVIDED BENEATH THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE, AND NO ELECTRICAL OR PLUMBING WAS PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT. TO REFERENCE THE EXISTING MAIN BUILDING OF THE EVERHART EQUIPMENT BUSINESS, WHAT THEY ARE PROPOSING IS COMPATIBLE TO THEIR MAIN BUILDING. AS YOU CAN SEE ON AVENUE 54, THEIR FRONTAGE HAS THE SAME. METAL FACADE, SAME ALONG TYLER STREET. THIS IS THEIR EXISTING CONDITIONS ALONG THEIR TYLER STREET FRONTAGE AND AVENUE 54 FRONTAGE. WITH NO CURRENT LANDSCAPING. THERE IS CHAIN LINK FENCING. THIS WOULD BE THEIR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. IT WOULD INCLUDE 50 YELLOW LANTANAS, SIX MESQUITES AND THREE FOURTH INCH CALIFORNIA GOLD GRAVEL ALONG TYLER STREET. FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FINDINGS. NUMBER ONE THROUGH FIVE, THEY WERE ALL MET. THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT UNDER SECTION 15 303 OF THE STATE CYCLE GUIDELINES. THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 3360 SQUARE FOOT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ACCESSORY BUILDING TO SERVE THE EXISTING BUILDING. EVERHART EQUIPMENT, LOCATED AT 86 100 AVENUE 54APN, 763141007 AND 763141009. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO ADOPT RESOLUTION PC2026-17 TO CONDITIONALLY APPROVED AR NUMBER 25-13, WITH THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE WITH US. OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. ALL RIGHT. SO NOW I WILL OPEN THE. FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM RESIDENTS? THE TIME IS 610. NO. NO PUBLIC COMMENTS ONLINE. OTHER NONE ONLINE. OKAY. THANK YOU. SO NOW I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS AT 610. ALL RIGHT. SO NOW I WILL. IF THE [00:10:10] APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION, YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME. I MY NAME IS STEVE EBERHARDT. I'M THE 95% OWNER OF EBERHARDT EQUIPMENT. MY SON IS THE 5% OWNER. MY DAD STARTED THE BUSINESS IN 1946, THE SAME YEAR COACHELLA STARTED ITS CITY, AND MY SON IS GOING TO CARRY ON THE LEGACY OF OUR COMPANY. WE ARE. KUBOTA TRACTOR DEALERSHIP IS OUR PRINCIPAL BUSINESS. I LIKE TO CALL KUBOTA THE TOYOTA OF THE TRACTOR BUSINESS. THEY ARE MADE IN JAPAN. THEY HAVE GREAT QUALITY AND ENGINEERING AND THEY'RE THE. MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW THIS, BUT THEY'RE THE HIGHEST SELLING TRACTOR IN AMERICA AND IN CALIFORNIA. BUT THEY'RE NOT IN COACHELLA. SO THAT'S THAT'S MY CHALLENGE. I HAVE THREE DEALERSHIPS, ONES IN SANTA ANA, ONES IN OXNARD. AND, AND THEN THE ONE HERE, WE MOVED FROM THE CORNER OF CESAR CHAVEZ AND AVENUE 54, WHICH WAS A BIG, HUGE LOT, ABOUT 12 ACRES AND QUITE UGLY. AND WE MOVED ABOUT IN 2020, I BELIEVE, TO WHERE WE'RE AT RIGHT NOW. BOUGHT IT FROM TESSERA TO SARA, I THINK WAS A CHALLENGE FOR YOU ALL BECAUSE OF THE PARKING. THEIR PARKING OVERFLOWED ON THE STREET AND IT WAS A NUISANCE FOR Y'ALL. AND SO ANYWAY, IT'S BEEN IT'S BEEN A GREAT FACILITY, GREAT LOCATION FOR US. WE SERVE THE FARM BUSINESS, WE SERVE THE GOLF COURSE BUSINESS, AND WE SERVE THE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT BUSINESS WITH OUR EQUIPMENT. THIS STRUCTURE IS MOSTLY A SAFETY MATTER TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRACTORS, BUT ALSO PARKING. AND THE CONTAINER STRUCTURES ARE TO STORE PARTS, METAL, MOSTLY METAL PARTS. THE ONLY COMBUSTIBLES INSIDE THE CONTAINERS WOULD BE THE CARTONS THAT CONTAIN THE PARTS. AND SO IT'S PRETTY SIMPLE STRUCTURE. OVERALL COST IS ABOUT $100,000. AND SO THAT'S I CAME UP HERE AT THE REQUEST OF THE STAFF. I LIVE IN SAN DIEGO, SO OKAY. ANYWAY, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME, I'D JUST LIKE TO COMPLIMENT STAFF FOR BEING VERY PROFESSIONAL AND EFFICIENT AND PROACTIVE AND RETURNING CALLS AND RESPONDING. I COME UP ABOUT ONCE A MONTH, AND USUALLY WHEN I COME UP, I GO TO THE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND ASK A FEW QUESTIONS FOR ADRIAN AND VANESSA. AND THEY'VE ALWAYS BEEN VERY GENEROUS WITH THEIR TIME. EVEN IF I DON'T HAVE AN APPOINTMENT, THEY'LL USUALLY MAKE THEMSELVES AVAILABLE. SO ANYWAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS? DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. EBERHART? BY THE WAY, OUR SALES ARE IN THE AREA OF ABOUT ABOUT $10 MILLION. AND OUR OTHER TWO FACILITIES, OUR SALES ARE ABOUT $20 MILLION. AND OUR SALES SHOULD BE ABOUT $20 MILLION HERE IN COACHELLA. IT'S WHERE WE EXPECT TO GET IN A FEW YEARS, AND THAT GENERATES A FAIR BIT OF SALES TAX FOR YOUR BENEFIT, WHICH I THINK IS UNRESTRICTED FUNDS FOR THE CITY. SO PERFECT. YEAH. WELL, THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. EBERHART. OKAY. ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. SO. SO NOW I WILL OPEN TO TO THE COMMISSION. COMMISSIONER FONSECA, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? YEAH. THE THE BIG THING IS, IS THE IS THERE A A LANDSCAPE AGREEMENT? I KNOW THAT THERE'S THERE'S THE ACTIVE WHAT WAS THERE. OBVIOUSLY THE PROPOSED THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING IS, IS, IS IN THAT AREA. SO I WANTED TO KNOW IF, IF I MISREAD THAT, I WANTED TO ASK IF THERE'S ANY LANDSCAPE AGREEMENT IN THAT IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA. I KNOW IT'S, YOU KNOW, WHAT THE WORLD THAT WE'RE LIVING IN HERE IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY, IT'S EVERYTHING'S DUSTY, RIGHT? AND THE AIR AND EVERYTHING. BUT I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHAT TYPE OF MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT IS ON THAT JUST BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, IT'S A NEW LOCATION. AND, AND WE WANTED TO HAVE THE INVESTMENT OF MR. EBERHART IS GOING TO BE THERE. YOU KNOW, WE, I THINK WE I THINK HE AND US WOULD LIKE TO MAINTAIN THAT [00:15:05] THAT STEP, THAT ESTHETIC AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. NUMBER 13, THERE WOULD BE A REQUIREMENT FOR A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON SITE AND OFF ON SITE AND OFF SITE LANDSCAPING. SO, SO THEN I GUESS MY NEXT QUESTION IS, I WANT TO UNDERSTAND IN, IN THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS, IS, IS THE RECOMMENDATION IS A CONDITIONALLY APPROVED WHAT, WHAT IS THE CONDITION THAT THAT WE ARE REFERRING TO AND NOT A STRAIGHT APPROVAL CAN CAN YOU CLARIFY AS STAFF WHAT THAT THAT WOULD BE THE KIND OF APPROVAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW NUMBER 25131 THROUGH 19 WOULD BE THOSE CONDITIONS. SO IT WOULD STILL NEED TO GO THROUGH THAT ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL OR THIS WOULD BE THE SECOND. YEAH, THIS ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW, IF APPROVED, WOULD BE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BECAUSE THERE'S THOSE LISTED CONDITIONS. THIS WOULD BE THE FINAL STEP FOR THE PROJECT. OKAY. THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW. YEAH. BECAUSE I THINK THERE'S BEEN A COUPLE OF TIMES THAT THAT THAT HAS BEEN IT, BUT THE, THE REASONS HAVE BEEN VERY VARIED. SO THAT'S WHY I WANT TO UNDERSTAND WHERE THAT, WHERE THAT CAME FROM. SO I APPRECIATE THAT CLARIFICATION. AND THOSE ARE ALL MY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER ORDORICA. I FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU, STEVE, FOR COMING OUT HERE, MAKING THE DRIVE AND COMING OUT TO THE THE CITY IN PERSON FOR THE MEETING. I APPRECIATE THAT IT LOOKS THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS SIMILAR TO THE EXISTING BUILDING, SO IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE A WHOLE OTHER LIKE BELONGS TO ANOTHER COMPANY. SO I LIKE THAT IT'S THE SAME TYPE OF DESIGN. I KNOW THAT IT'S LISTED ON HERE, THAT LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ALONG 54 ARE NOT PROPOSED AT THIS TIME. AND THAT'S AT THE CITY MANAGER'S, I'M SORRY, THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS REVIEW, I KNOW THAT THERE'S PROBABLY NOT A TIMELINE AS TO WHEN THAT WILL BE, BUT I'M JUST CURIOUS. THOUGHTS OF HAVING BEAUTIFUL LANDSCAPING DONE. IF THE SIDEWALK ISN'T VERY UP TO PAR WITH HOW. IF THE SIDEWALK ISN'T. I'M NOT SURE IF THE SIDEWALK CONDITION AS IT LOOKS RIGHT NOW, BUT IF IT'S NOT AS APPEALING TO WALK THROUGH, IF WE'RE SPENDING MONEY ON LANDSCAPING. FOR LANDSCAPING, I NEED TO FOLLOW UP WITH ENGINEERING TO SEE IF THAT'S GOING TO BE A PART OF THEIR PROJECT IN THE FUTURE. THEY MENTIONED THAT SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS WOULD BE INCLUDED, AND THAT'S WHEN THERE'S FUNDING FOR THE PROJECT. YEAH. AND JUST TO CLARIFY, WE DID REACH OUT TO THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND THOSE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE DONE ONCE WE ARE ABLE TO ALLOCATE FUNDING FOR THIS. AND IT WILL ONLY BE SIDEWALK. THERE ARE NO LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTED FOR AVENUE 54, BUT WE DIDN'T REQUEST LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AT THIS TIME BECAUSE WHEN THAT FUTURE SIDEWALK COMES IN, IT WILL RIP OR IT WILL HAVE TO DAMAGE SOME OF THE LANDSCAPING THERE. OKAY, I SEE, OKAY, THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION. OTHER THAN THAT, I DON'T THINK I HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS. I THINK IT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD, AND I KNOW THIS COULDN'T HAVE COME AT A BETTER TIME OF YEAR, DEPENDING ON HOW QUICKLY THIS GETS COMPLETED. I KNOW WORKING OUT IN THIS HEAT AND SUN IS NOT. IT'S IT'S NOT FUN. SO I'M GLAD THAT AT LEAST STAFF WILL BE ABLE TO HAVE SOME SORT OF SHADE STRUCTURE WHILE OUT THERE. THAT'S IT FOR MY COMMENTS. THANK YOU SO MUCH, COMMISSIONER, FOR MY COMMENTS. SINCE THE LANDSCAPING WILL NOW GO IN AVENUE 54. WILL IT GO AFTER THE SIDEWALK? THAT WOULD BE WITH. IT'S NOT A CONDITION OF APPROVAL AS PART OF THIS PROJECT, AND WE DON'T HAVE REALLY PROJECTED TIMELINE, SO IT WOULD BE UP TO THE APPLICANT TO PUT THAT LANDSCAPING IN AFTERWARD. CAN THAT BE ADDED TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL? YEAH, THAT COULD BE JUST SOMETIME AFTER AFTER THE SIDEWALK, THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS. AGAIN, WE DON'T HAVE A TIMELINE FOR THAT. SO IT COULD BE SOME TIME FROM NOW. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH, I WOULD LIKE THAT TO BE A CONDITION SINCE IT'S ON THE CORNER OF THAT STREET. TO THAT CONDITION. AND LET'S SEE, AND IF WE COULD HAVE THE APPLICANT ALSO CONFIRM THAT [00:20:06] THEY ARE ACCEPTABLE OF THIS CONDITION. OKAY. SO. THERE'S BEEN QUITE A DISCUSSION BETWEEN OUR MYSELF AND STAFF ON THE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED FOR A $100,000 PROJECT, THAT THE COSTS OF THE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS WERE INITIALLY PROPOSED TO BE DOUBLE THE 100,000 AND. SO WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR IS NOT A TRIVIAL COST. SO I OBJECT TO THAT CONDITION. YOU OBJECT. OKAY, SO WHAT WE'VE OFFERED IS ON $100,000 PROJECT WE'VE OFFERED. WHAT'S A $35,000 IMPROVEMENT? AND AS I UNDERSTAND IT, IN THE WHOLE WORLD OF AN ATTORNEY MAY COMMENT ON THIS. THE WHOLE WORLD OF LAND USE EXEMPTION, THAT 30% IS CONSIDERED KIND OF A LIMIT. SO WHAT I'VE OFFERED IS A $35,000 IMPROVEMENT ON TYLER STREET, AND THAT'S THE LANDSCAPING AND THE SIDEWALK. NO SIDEWALK, NO SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING, JUST THE LANDSCAPING ON TYLER STREET. DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY COMMENTS? NO. OKAY. SO EVEN AFTER WE HAVE THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON AVENUE 54, IT STILL HAVE NO LANDSCAPING. WHAT WE DO HAVE IS A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, AND WHAT WE DO HAVE IS ON THE PLANS. THEY ARE GOING TO PUT THAT TYLER STREET. SO IT WOULD BE TO MAINTAIN THE EXISTING ON SITE LANDSCAPING, THE NEW TYLER STREET LANDSCAPING AND MAINTAIN AT LEAST AND SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS CONDITION, WHEN THE SIGNAGE CAME IN TO MAINTAIN FREE OF WEEDS AND DEBRIS, AND THAT THEY MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPING AS PART OF THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL, THEY WERE AGAIN REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPING FREE OF WEEDS AND DEBRIS. SO THEY DID. AND OKAY, OKAY. PERFECT. ALL RIGHT. SO I WILL DO MY MOTION AND THEN WE CAN AND ANYONE ELSE CAN MOTION SOMETHING DIFFERENTLY. I WILL MOTION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2026-17 TO CONDITIONALLY APPROVE AR NUMBER 2313 WITH THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS AS WELL, WITH THE FINDING AND CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, AND TO INCLUDE SOME CONDITION TO ADD LANDSCAPING ON AVENUE 54 AFTER THE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN OR STREET IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN PUT IN. WOULD YOU LIKE TO INCLUDE A TIMELINE? SO A YEAR OR TWO YEARS AFTER THE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE ON AVENUE 54, LIKE A YEAR AND A HALF YEAR AND A HALF. I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION. ROLL CALL. SORRY, COMMISSIONER ORDORICA YES. COMMISSIONER FONSECA. YES. CHAIRPERSON. LATTA. YES. MOTION PASSES. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. EVERHART. ALL RIGHT. SO NOW I THINK WE'RE MOVING INTO INFORMATIONAL ITEMS. DO WE [Informational] HAVE ANY INFORMATIONAL ITEMS? OUR NEW CITY MANAGER, MR. GUS ROMO, STARTED THIS PAST MONDAY. SO HE'S REALLY EXCITED TO BE HERE. HE'S BEEN A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH SO FAR. I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO YOU GUYS MEETING WITH HIM. I DO THINK HE'S GOING TO COME TO ONE OF OUR UPCOMING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS, BUT I'LL LET YOU GUYS KNOW IN ADVANCE WHEN HE'S GOING TO BE ABLE TO MAKE ONE OF THOSE MEETINGS. OKAY, PERFECT. AND THEN WE DID HAVE OUR ALTERNATE COMMISSIONER AS CITY ATTORNEY, DANIEL MENTIONED, MISS STEPHANIE AUBRY, WHO WAS SELECTED AT THE LAST CITY COUNCIL MEETING. SO SHE'S GOING TO BE SWORN IN ON JULY 1ST. SO AT THAT JULY 1ST MEETING, IN THE EVENT THAT WE HAVE AN ABSENCE, SHE'LL BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THAT MEETING. PERFECT. AND THEN JUST TO WRAP THINGS UP AGAIN, OUR NEXT MEETING IS GOING TO BE JULY 1ST HERE AT COUNCIL CHAMBERS. OKAY, PERFECT. AND THEN ALSO A QUICK COMMENT. I'M STILL OPEN TO DOING ONE ON ONES WITH ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS. IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR ANY CONCERNS REGARDING PUBLIC COMMENT OR ANYTHING BROWN ACT RELATED, ALWAYS OPEN TO DISCUSSIONS WITH YOU IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, ANYTHING. [00:25:06] RIGHT. BECAUSE OF EVERYTHING GOING ON, JUST SO THAT WE ALL KNOW THE LEGALITY AND THE SCOPE OF THE COMMISSION AND EVERYTHING. SO PERFECT. THANK YOU. WELL, WELCOME, MR. COMMISSIONER MORRIS, WE'LL HOPE TO SEE YOU IN JULY. SO I WILL THEN ADJOURN THE MEETING. OR DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION THAT YOU WANT TO ADD? NO OR YES? I DON'T THINK SO. NO. ALL RIGHT. SO WITH THAT I WILL ADJOURN THE MEETING AT LET'S SEE. IT'S * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.