[CALL TO ORDER ] [00:00:08] YOU KNOW, CAUSE MEETING TO ORDER AT 6:00. COMMISSIONER, CAN WE GET THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE? YES. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. MOMMY. ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE THIS. THERE'S ANY NUMBER. CAN WE PLEASE GET ROLL CALL? CHAIRPERSON MURILLO HERE. VICE CHAIRPERSON FONSECA, PRESENT. COMMISSIONER LAURA, PRESENT. AND ALTERNATE COMMISSIONER CABALLERO IS ABSENT. OKAY, GIVE ME A SECOND. AT THIS MOMENT, WE'LL DO [ APPROVAL OF AGENDA] THE APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. AT THIS TIME, THE COMMISSION MAY ANNOUNCE ANY ITEMS BEING PULLED FROM THE AGENDA OR CONTINUE TO THEIR DATE, OR REQUEST THE MOVING OF AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA. CAN I GET A MOTION? WE DON'T HAVE ANY ITEMS BEING MOVED. NO, A MOTION TO APPROVE. I'LL SECOND. CHAIRPERSON. MURILLO. YES. VICE CHAIRPERSON. FONSECA. YES. COMMISSIONER. LARA. YES. [ APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES] MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING? MINUTES OF MAY 21ST, 2025. AND WE CAN DO THOSE RIGHT, KENDRA? BECAUSE THAT WAS WHEN COMMISSIONER RIVERA WAS HERE, RIGHT? I WAS HERE, AND I KNOW COMMISSIONER CABALLERO WAS HERE. SO CAN WE APPROVE THOSE WITHOUT HIM? YES. SO YOU CAN APPROVE THEM? YOU'RE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME THAT THOSE ARE THE MINUTES FOR THAT MEETING. LIKE YOU'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING LEGAL OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. SO. OKAY, YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND APPROVE THEM. SO I MOVE MOTION TO APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS FOR MAY 21ST, 2025. I WILL SECOND. CHAIRPERSON MURILLO. YES. VICE CHAIRPERSON. FONSECA. YES. COMMISSIONER. LARA. YES. MOTION CARRIES FOR JUNE 4TH. COMMISSIONER LARA WAS NOT HERE. SO WE DON'T HAVE A QUORUM TO APPROVE, CORRECT? YES. SO? SO YOU'RE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME THAT THOSE ARE THE MINUTES FOR THAT MEETING. SO IT DOESN'T IT DOESN'T HINDER THAT PROCESS. NO IT DOESN'T. OKAY. OKAY. SO MOVING ON TO RANKED COMMUNICATIONS. WE HAVE TO MAKE A MOTION ON THE MOTION. THE APPROVAL FOR THE MINUTES FOR JUNE 4TH, 2025. IS THERE A SECOND SECOND. I'LL SECOND. OKAY. CHAIRPERSON. MURILLO. YES. VICE CHAIRPERSON. FONSECA. YES. COMMISSIONER. LARA. YES. MOTION CARRIES. OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS? THERE ARE NONE. PUBLIC COMMENTS. THE PUBLIC MAY ADDRESS THE COMMISSION AT ANY ITEM OF INTEREST TO THE PUBLIC. THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, BUT IS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION THEREOF. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE MINUTES. I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC COMMENT AT 603. THERE ARE NONE ONLINE. OKAY, SO I'LL BE CLOSING THE PUBLIC COMMENT AT 604. REPORTS AND REQUESTS. THERE ARE NO REPORTS [PUBLIC HEARING CALENDAR (QUASI-JUDICIAL)] AND REQUESTS AND THERE ARE NO NON HEARING ITEMS. SO MOVING ON TO PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. WE'RE GOING TO GO WITH ITEM NUMBER THREE, THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF NUMBER 20 501 OCEAN MIST SIGNAGE. HELLO PLANNING COMMISSION AND CHAIR I'LL BE PRESENTING THIS ITEM FOR R 2501 OCEAN MIST SIGNAGE CASE FILE NUMBER R 2501. SO FOR A BIT OF BACKGROUND, THE APPLICANT IS DANIEL MARTINEZ. THE CITY APPLICATION DATE WAS JANUARY 7TH, 2025. THIS WAS FOR A NEW AND VARIANCE APPLICATION. THE VARIANCE ONE OF THE VARIANCE APPLICATIONS WAS ALREADY APPROVED IN THE PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AND WE'RE ONLY PRESENTING THE R NUMBER 2501 FOR THIS PROJECT. FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, ONE MONUMENT SIGN AND ONE MAIN BUILDING SIGN AT SITE 5300 ENTERPRISE WAY. THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION IS INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND THE ZONING DESIGNATIONS ARE MANUFACTURING, SERVICE AND HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. [00:05:05] FOR MORE. BACKGROUND. ON MAY 7TH, 2025, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE LOCATION VARIANCE. VARIANCE 2503. THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONTINUED R 2501 AND VARIANCE 2502 FOR THE DESIGN OF THE SIGNS. AND JUST TO CLARIFY, THERE WERE ORIGINALLY THREE ENTITLEMENTS FOR THE PROJECT. R 2501 FOR THE SIGN DESIGN IS BEING PRESENTED HERE TODAY FOR THIS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AS WAS CONTINUED FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING. VARIANCE 2502 WAS A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR THE MONUMENT SIGN DESIGN, BUT THIS REQUEST IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SO THAT VARIANCE IS NO LONGER REQUIRED AND TO CONTINUE VARIANCE 2503 AS I MENTIONED, WAS ALREADY APPROVED IN THE LAST PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON MAY 7TH. TO CONTINUE THE PROJECT AGAIN IS FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, ONE MONUMENT SIGN AS THE IMAGE YOU SEE IN THE MIDDLE, AND THEN ONE MAIN BUILDING SIGN. AND JUST TO GO BACK TO WHAT HAPPENED IN THE PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTED STAFF TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT TO MEET IN THE MIDDLE FOR THESE SIGNS. SO I'LL BE GOING OVER HOW WE MET IN THE MIDDLE HERE. SO SIGN BELOW IS THE PROPOSED SIGN FOR THIS. SO IN OUR ORIGINAL PRESENTATION, WE HAD ASKED THEM TO PROVIDE DESIGN AND MATERIALS TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL THEME OF THE BUILDING. SO WHAT THEY'RE ADDING TO THIS SIGN NOW IS THIS WHITE CAP ON TOP OF THE STONE BASE, WHICH WE BELIEVE WILL PROVIDE A BETTER LOOK FOR THE SIGN. AND THEY ARE ALSO PROVIDING POP OUT LETTERS. SO IF YOU COULD IT'S A LITTLE BIT HARD TO TELL, BUT THE IMAGE SHOWS THAT THEY NOW ARE PROVIDING THOSE POP OUT LETTERS, WHICH IN THE ORIGINAL SIGN THEY DIDN'T. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WHITE CAP, WHY ARE WE WHY WAS THIS A REQUEST FROM STAFF. RIGHT. AND THE REASON FOR THE WHITE CAP IS TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL THEME OF THE BUILDING. SO IF YOU CAN SEE IN THE CIRCLES OF THE BUILDING, ON THE BUILDING ROOF, IT IS A WHITE AND BROWN BUILDING DESIGN, AND YOU CAN SEE IN THE OTHER RED CIRCLED AREA IS THEIR FENCING PILLARS. AND THAT IS ALSO A WHITE BROWN DESIGN. SO WE FELT THAT HAVING THE WHITE CAP WOULD MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL THEME OF THE BUILDING. AND JUST TO SHOW HOW WE MET IN THE MIDDLE, OUR ORIGINAL STAFF REQUEST WAS FOR THEM TO REDESIGN THE SIGN COMPLETELY AND TO HAVE SOMETHING LIKE THAT IMAGE THERE WHERE IT'S ALL LIKE A STUCCO MATERIAL, AND THE ORIGINAL REQUEST IS SHOWN ALL THE WAY IN THE RIGHT. AND HOW WE MET IN THE MIDDLE WAS TO PROVIDE THAT WHITE CAP. I THINK THE CITY REALLY WANTED TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT, NOT TO, YOU KNOW, ALL THESE SIGNS PER THE APPLICANT WERE ALREADY BOUGHT AND EVERYTHING. SO WE WANTED TO BE ABLE TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT AND MAKE A CHANGE THAT STILL WORKS WITH WHAT WE REQUESTED, BUT ALSO WORKS WITH THE APPLICANT AS WELL. TO CONTINUE FOR THE MONUMENT DESIGN, THERE IS A MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENT REQUIRING TO PROVIDE A DESIGN AND MATERIALS TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL THEME OF THE BUILDING, SO ORIGINALLY IT DIDN'T HAVE THAT STONE BASE AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE IMAGE. SO AS PART OF MEETING IN THE MIDDLE, WE DID REQUEST HAVING THAT STONE BASE AND A WHITE CAP SO IT CAN MATCH THE OTHER SIGNS, AND IT COULD ALSO MATCH THE BUILDING AGAIN TO HAVE A BROWN WHITE DESIGN TO MATCH THE BUILDINGS. AND ALSO THEY ARE PROVIDING POP OUT LETTERS AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. SO THEY ARE MEETING OUR REQUESTS FOR THIS MONUMENT SIGN. AND AGAIN HOW WE MET IN THE MIDDLE. ORIGINALLY WE WANTED SOMETHING THAT ENTIRELY LOOKED LIKE THE BUILDING, RIGHT? AND THE ORIGINAL REQUEST DIDN'T HAVE THAT STONE BASE. SO THIS IS HOW WE WORK WITH THE APPLICANT TO MEET IN THE MIDDLE AND TO AGAIN, UNDERSTANDING THAT THE APPLICANT ALREADY PUT THESE SIGNS UP WITHOUT A PERMIT. BUT WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE, YOU KNOW, WE COULD MEET IN THE MIDDLE SO WE COULD STILL MEET OUR DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT, FOR THE DESIGN OF THE MAIN BUILDING SIGN, WE ASKED ORIGINALLY FOR THEM TO NOT PROVIDE A BACKING TO THE TO THE SIGN, BUT AS PART OF MEETING IN THE MIDDLE, WE HAD REQUESTED THAT WE UNDERSTAND THAT THEY HAVE THE BACKING FOR THE SIGN FOR THEIR BRANDING. RIGHT? THIS IS PART OF THEIR BRAND. SO WE WERE OKAY KEEPING THE BACKING, BUT WE DID REQUEST THAT GREEN PERIMETER. IT'S A LITTLE BIT HARD TO SEE, BUT THE GREEN PERIMETER AROUND THE SIGN TO PROVIDE A POP OUT TO IT SO IT HAS A BETTER, YOU KNOW, QUALITY LOOK TO ADD SOME DIMENSION. AND AGAIN, THIS IS HOW WE MET IN THE MIDDLE. THE ORIGINAL REQUEST NOT TO HAVE THE BACKING AND TO MEET IN THE MIDDLE. WE ARE ASKING FOR THEM YES TO KEEP THE BRANDING BUT TO PROVIDE SOME DIMENSION TO THAT SIGN. AND AS FOR OUR [00:10:06] RECOMMENDATION, STAFF RECOMMENDS THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW NUMBER 2501 FOR APPROVAL OF FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, ONE MONUMENT SIGN AND ONE MAIN BUILDING SIGN AT THE OCEAN FARM PROPERTY AT 52 300 ENTERPRISE WAY, WITH THE FINDINGS LISTED IN RESOLUTION NUMBER PC 2025 DASH 11, AND DETERMINING THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS COMPLIANT WITH SEQUA. THAT'S THE END OF MY PRESENTATION. THE APPLICANTS TEAM IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, AND I'M ALSO AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER? YES. WELL IT'S NOT REALLY QUESTIONS. I DO HAVE SUGGESTIONS. SO FOR THE MONUMENT SIGN I LIKE IT. I LIKE THE MONUMENT SIGN. THAT'S ALL GOOD FOR THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. I FEEL LIKE THE COLORS CLASH. LIKE HAVING THAT BLUE AND THEN THE RED AND THEN THE GREEN. SO IS THERE SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DO THAT CAN MAKE IT LOOK BETTER? I DON'T MIND THE SIGN ITSELF. IT'S JUST I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN CHANGE THE RED TO SOMETHING ELSE, LIKE ANOTHER COLOR. THAT'D BE A QUESTION. BEST FOR THE APPLICANT. OKAY. APPLICANT'S TEAM. MAYBE BLOCK OR. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S GOING TO LIGHT UP AT NIGHT. I. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S THE CASE FOR THIS ONE. YEAH. SORRY. JEFF GRADY WITH CINERAMA. SO RED IS NORMALLY USED BECAUSE IT'S KNOWN AS THE MOST VISIBLE COLOR. ESPECIALLY FOR THIS BEING USED AS DIRECTIONAL. THESE SIGNS WILL BE LIT. THEY HAVE, I GUESS, A LOT OF TRAFFIC, SHIPPING, TRUCK SHIPPING AND STUFF. SO THAT'S WHY WE USE THAT. GOING BLACK I DON'T KNOW. YEAH. BUT IT'S COMMONLY USED MAINLY BECAUSE IT'S MORE FOR DIRECTIONAL. IT'S NOT. I DO SEE THAT CURRENTLY I KNOW THAT WE'RE WE'RE AMAZON IS SETTING LIKE IN DHS OR SETTING THEIR SIGNAGE AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE. AND IT'S ACTUALLY LIKE A BLUE. SO I DON'T KNOW IF IT COULD I DON'T KNOW I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU GUYS ARE THINKING. MAYBE, I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE WE CAN WAIT TILL THEY YOU KNOW WHAT THEY THINK. BUT THAT'S JUST MY THOUGHT. WE COULD USE THE BLUE THAT THEY HAVE IN THEIR LOGO. SO IT'S MORE IN THEIR BRANDING AND WE'RE OPEN TO JUST SUGGESTIONS. JUST SO I DON'T KNOW. FOR ME IT'S JUST IT DOESN'T MATCH. AND IT, YOU KNOW, WE'RE GOING ALL THIS WAY TO DO THE STONE AND MAKE IT LOOK NICE AND THEN HAVE THE COLORS CLASH. I FEEL LIKE IT'S A LOT FOR IT NOT TO LOOK EXTREMELY COHESIVE, I GUESS. RIGHT. AND IN REGARDS TO THE ACTUAL SIGN IN THE BUILDING OR ON THE BUILDING, I DO LIKE THAT SIGN A LOT. IT'S JUST THAT IT CLASHES AGAIN WITH THE BROWN WOOD. CHANGING THAT BROWN PAINT OR PAINTING THAT BROWN COLOR TO SOMETHING ELSE. BE MORE COHESIVE AS WELL. SO DANIEL MARTINEZ DID SHARE WITH US. SO I DO WANT TO THANK KENDRA AND ADRIAN. WE DID HAVE A MEETING, A COUPLE MEETINGS SO FAR WITH DANIEL. HE DID SHARE WITH US THAT THEY ARE PLANNING TO PAINT THE BUILDING. OKAY, SO THAT WOULD BE A GREAT INPUT FOR THAT. SO YEAH, THOSE ARE MY TWO INPUTS. LIKE I WOULD LIKE THAT COLOR TO BE CHANGED JUST SO IT DOESN'T CLASH WITH THE BLUE AND THE GREEN. AND THEN I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU GUYS THINK ABOUT THE OTHER DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE. BUT YEAH THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU I DO AGREE WITH THE THAT RED IS FOR. IT'S JUST MORE VISIBLE, ESPECIALLY WHEN TRUCKS ARE COMING IN AND LOADING AND JUST FINDING WHERE TO PARK OR WHERE THE DOCKS ARE. IT'S THE RED IS JUST YOU KNOW, FROM AFAR. SO I DO SEE WHY WHY THEY WENT WITH THE RED. ANY COMMENTS? YEAH I THINK THE RED ONES, WHAT YOU GUYS HAD BEFORE. RIGHT TOO. RIGHT. YOU GUYS HAD A RED COLOR BEFORE AND THE SIGNAGE. MY QUESTION IS, ARE SOME OF THESE SIGNS ALREADY UP? AND THEY'RE JUST THERE ARE NOT THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. NO, NOT THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. SO WHAT IS IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND ME ASKING WHAT IS UP ALREADY? THE MONUMENT SIGN AND THE BUILDING SIGN. OKAY, SO THEN THAT MEANS THAT THE BUILDING SIGN. YOU'RE JUST GOING TO ADD THAT GREEN, CORRECT. POP IT UP. AND THEN THE ROUND AND THE MONUMENTS THAT YOU'RE, YOU'RE TAKING IT OFF AND THEN BUILDING THE STONE. WE'RE GOING TO BE ADDING THAT TO THE BASE OF THE EXISTING SIGN. OKAY. [00:15:03] COOL. WHAT'S THE ESTIMATE DATE OF COMPLETION FOR THE. I WAS GOING TO ASK IF I COULD HAVE 60 DAYS OR SO TO DO THIS. I SEE A REASONABLE. WHAT DO WE THINK? YEAH, I THINK AT THIS POINT, YOU KNOW. AND I'M WITH COMMISSIONER LARA AND MAKING ALL THESE RECOMMENDATIONS. BUT IT'S JUST OBVIOUSLY THE REALITY IS I APPRECIATE YOU COMING BACK. AND OBVIOUSLY LAST MEETING WAS A LEARNING OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL OF US. RIGHT. AND SO I THINK MOVING FORWARD WE WANT TO, YOU KNOW, GIVE, GIVE SOME SORT OF ADJUSTMENT WITH THIS PROCESS. BUT I THINK AS I'VE BEEN SAYING FOR LIKE THREE MINUTES ALREADY, RIGHT? KENDRA IS JUST THIS IS AN ISSUE ACROSS OUR CITY, RIGHT, THAT WE NEED TO WORK ON AND WE NEED TO BE MINDFUL AND EMPATHETIC. BUT AT THE SAME TIME, THERE'S NEW GUIDELINES, RIGHT, THAT WE NEED TO ADHERE BY, NOT JUST YOU AS A BUSINESS, BUT OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW, WE'VE SEEN A COUPLE OTHER BUSINESSES AFTER YOU'VE COME IN THAT WE'VE HAD THESE SAME CONVERSATIONS. AND SO I'M ALSO TAKING THIS ON AS A, AS A, AS A LEARNING OPPORTUNITY FOR THE COMMUNITY. BUT AS OF RIGHT NOW, I THINK WHAT YOU'VE DONE IS GREAT AND, AND KIND OF CONTINUE MEETING IN THE MIDDLE. BUT THIS IS A TRIAL ERROR FOR US. AND THEN MOVING FORWARD, THIS IS WHAT IT'S GOING TO GO. BUT AS OF RIGHT NOW, I HAVE NO QUESTIONS. IF ANYTHING I WOULD LIKE TO SAY IS A LESSONS BEEN LEARNED NOT ONLY FROM US, BUT HOPEFULLY FROM EVERYONE ELSE, THAT THE CITY IS VERY SERIOUS ABOUT THIS AND CHANGE IT. SO WE NORMALLY DO NOT DO WHAT HAPPENED HERE. SOME GUIDANCE FROM THE CLIENT, BUT IN ANY CASE THE LESSONS BEEN LEARNED. SO RIGHT. USE US AS A PRECEDENCE IF YOU WOULD LIKE. AND OH YES, TRUST ME, WE I WILL, THANK YOU AND I'LL PUT THAT IN THE RECORD. I WILL USE THIS AS A PRESIDENT. NOT NOT. AND AGAIN, I THINK IT'S BEEN MORE OF A LEARNING OPPORTUNITY, RIGHT, FOR ALL OF US. WE'RE NOT HERE TO, YOU KNOW, BE LIKE YOU DID BAD. NO. IT'S JUST LIKE, HEY, I KNOW THAT THESE WERE DONE AND HAD BEEN DONE HISTORICALLY IN A CERTAIN WAY. WE JUST WANT TO CHANGE THAT. RIGHT. AND SO IT'S ONLY ABOUT EDUCATING. AND SO THAT'S WHY I GO BACK AND TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE AS A CITY, RIGHT. AND AS A COMMISSION CAN HELP, THIS CAN HELP OUR BUSINESSES UNDERSTAND THAT AND THAT THEY FULLY UNDERSTAND, RIGHT. AND THAT THEY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT THE PARAMETERS ARE. YEAH. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. THANK YOU. ANY FURTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? NO. SO I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD AND APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER PC 2025 DASH 11 APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW NUMBER 25 014 FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, ONE MONUMENT SIGN AND ONE MAIN BUILDING SIGN AT THE OCEAN MIST FARM PROPERTY VARIANCE 2502 FOR DESIGN VARIANCE FOR THE MONUMENT SIGN. ORIGINALLY REQUESTED FOR THE FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS NO LONGER REQUIRED AS A PROPOSED PLANS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT WOULD ENSURE THE PROJECT DESIGN COMPLIES WITH MUNICIPAL CODE AND REQUIREMENTS TO HAVE A SECOND CHAIR. SO THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. SO CAN YOU OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING? YES I APOLOGIZE, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 618. THERE IS NO ONE ONLINE. SO I'LL BE CLOSING PUBLIC HEARING AT 618. ARE WE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE MOTION? YEAH. OKAY. SO I WILL MOVE FORWARD TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 20 PC 20 2511 APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW NUMBER 20 501 FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, ONE MONUMENT SIGN AND ONE MAIN BUILDING SIGN AT THE OCEAN MIST FARM PROPERTY. I'LL SECOND THAT. CHAIRPERSON MURILLO. YES. VICE CHAIRPERSON. FONSECA. YES, COMMISSIONER. LARA, CAN I ASK A QUESTION LIKE SO? AT THIS POINT MY SUGGESTIONS LIKE ARE OUT OF. YES. OKAY, SO RIGHT NOW WE NEED TO VOTE ON THAT MOTION. BUT I DO HAVE TO RUN YOU GUYS THAT IT'S ONLY THREE OF YOU GUYS. SO ALL THREE OF YOU HAVE TO AGREE. AND THEN SO IF YOU WANT THEM TO ADD YOUR SUGGESTIONS TO THAT MOTION, THE CHAIR WOULD HAVE TO RECALL HER MOTION AND THEN AMEND HER MOTION TO INCLUDE YOUR SUGGESTIONS. OKAY. COULD WE AT LEAST INCLUDE THE SUGGESTION FOR PAINTING THE BUILDING? I THINK THAT WAS IN THEIR PLANS ALREADY. SO WHENEVER THEY DO PAINT, THEY HAVE TO COME BACK WITH A PROPOSAL PAINT, OR BECAUSE THEY DON'T COME BACK WITH THE PAINTING PROPOSAL. SO RIGHT NOW THE WAY YOU'RE APPROVING IT IS APPROVING WHAT WAS PRESENTED TO YOU. SO RIGHT NOW, YOUR SUGGESTION OF THE PAINTING OR [00:20:04] WHATEVER THAT'S NOT INCLUDED IN THE MOTION. SO IF THE CHAIR WOULD LIKE TO AMEND HER MOTION AND INCLUDE YOUR RECOMMENDATION OF PAINTING THE BUILDING, THEN SHE CAN ACCEPT THE FRIENDLY AMENDMENT AND AMEND HER MOTION TO INCLUDE COMMISSIONER LARA'S SUGGESTION OF PAINTING THE BUILDING, AND THEN YOU WOULD HAVE TO GET A SECOND AND THEN JUST REVOTE ALL OVER AGAIN. OKAY, SO I WILL AMEND MY MOTION TO INCLUDE COMMISSIONER LARA'S REQUEST OF PAINTING THE BUILDIN, TO HAVE THE SIGN POP OUT MORE CORRECT. IS THERE A PARTICULAR COLOR THAT YOU'RE I MEAN, NO, I WILL LEAVE THAT TO THE STAFF. YOU KNOW, JUST LIKE THAT IT IT'S COHESIVE BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE THE BLUE WITH THE BROWN, IT LOOKS KIND OF TACKY TO ME. AND SINCE WE'RE GOING THROUGH ALL OF THIS, MIGHT AS WELL MAKE IT LOOK NICE. YEAH. SO IF I COULD SUGGEST THAT YOUR MOTION OR YOUR SUGGESTED, THE WAY YOU WOULD DO IT WOULD BE TO HAVE PROVIDE STAFF DIRECTION TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT, TO INTEGRATE YOUR SUGGESTIONS AND PAINTING THE BUILDING SOME SORT OF COLOR THAT WOULD MAKE THE SIGN STAND OUT OR. TO MAKE IT NOT CLASH. SO IF YOU GUYS WANT TO PROVIDE THAT DIRECTION OF STAFF, THEN STAFF CAN JUST FINALIZE THAT ON THEIR END. BUT YOU DO HAVE TO REMEMBER THAT YOU'RE NOT PROVIDING ANY SPECIFIC COLOR OR ANYTHING. SO WHATEVER STAFF FEELS WOULD BE THE CORRECT COLOR WOULD BE THE ONE THAT THEY WOULD WORK WITH THE APPLICANT AND PAINT THAT BUILDING OR THAT PORTION OF THE COLOR. YEAH, YEAH. OKAY. SO I, YOU KNOW, GIVE THAT DIRECTION TO STAFF, YOU KNOW, TO JUST FIND A COLOR THAT'S COHESIVE AND THAT'S ALL. YEAH. SO CHAIR, IF YOU CAN MAYBE RECALL YOUR MOTION AND THEN JUST THROUGH YOUR MOTION AGAIN, YOU DON'T NEED TO READ THE WHOLE THING. JUST YOU COULD JUST SAY THAT APPROVE THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW NUMBER 2501 WITH COMMISSIONER LARA SUGGESTIONS AND PROVIDE STAFF DIRECTION TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT TO FINALIZE THE PAINTING OF THAT THAT BUILDING. OKAY, SO I WILL RECALL MY PREVIOUS MOTION AND MOVING FORWARD WITH THE NEW MOTION OF APPROVING RESOLUTION NUMBER PC 20 2511, APPROVING THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW, INCLUDING COMMISSIONER LARA'S SUGGESTIONS OF PAINTING THE BUILDING AND HAVING STAFF WORK DIRECTLY WITH THE COMPANY TO FOR DIRECTION FOR FURTHER DIRECTION. DO YOU HAVE A SECOND I SECOND? CHAIRPERSON. MURILLO. YES. VICE CHAIRPERSON. FONSECA. YES. COMMISSIONER. LARA. YES. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. [INFORMATIONAL] ADRIAN. THANK YOU. ADRIAN. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY INFORMATIONAL? YES. SO THE YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATIONS WILL BE OPEN SOON IF THEY'RE NOT OPEN ALREADY. IF YOU GUYS KNOW ANY HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THAT ARE LIVING IN THE CITY OF COACHELLA THAT WOULD BE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THE YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION, WHERE LOOKING FOR APPLICATIONS, THE APPLICATION PERIOD CLOSES IN AUGUST, SO I CAN GET YOU GUYS A LINK TO THOSE APPLICATIONS. AND PLEASE ENCOURAGE ANYONE YOU KNOW TO APPLY. THEY HAVE TO LIVE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS, CORRECT? CORRECT. YES. ADVISORY. YES. AND WHAT DOES THAT ENTAIL? SO IT'S ALMOST KIND OF LIKE A MOCK CITY COUNCIL IN A SENSE, BUT FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS, JUST SO THEY CAN LEARN MORE ABOUT GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF COACHELLA SO THEY CAN BE A PART OF INITIATIVES, VOLUNTEER WORK, THINGS LIKE THAT. AND THIS ALLOWS THEM TO HAVE COMMUNITY SERVICE HOURS AS WELL, I BELIEVE. SO, YES. YEAH. AND THEN WE HAVE A CODE SECTION IN OUR MUNICIPAL CODE ABOUT IT AS WELL. SO WHEN I EMAIL YOU GUYS OVER THAT LINK, I'LL INCLUDE THE LINK TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION AS WELL. OKAY. AND THEY HAVE TO RESIDE IN THE CITY OF COACHELLA. THEY DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO GO TO SCHOOL IN THE CITY OF COACHELLA. SO I KNOW LAST YEAR THERE WAS A COUPLE STUDENTS THAT WENT TO INDIO HIGH SCHOOL OR SHADOW HILLS HIGH SCHOOL, BUT THEY LIVED IN COACHELLA, SO THEY WERE ABLE TO BE A PART OF THAT COMMISSION AS WELL. OKAY. ADVISORY COMMISSION. AWESOME. AND YOU'LL SEND OVER THE LINKS? I WILL, YES. THANK YOU. AND THEN THOSE WILL ALSO BE ANNOUNCED ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITES. IF YOU GUYS GET A CHANCE TO CHECK THOSE OUT. IF IT'S NOT UP NOW IT'LL BE UP SOON. SO JUST MAKE SURE TO SHARE WITH ANYONE THAT YOU KNOW. AND THEN THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS WERE CONTINUED AGAIN FROM THE LAST MEETING. SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AGAIN AT THE JUNE 25TH MEETING, AND APPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN [00:25:01] REOPENED FOR THAT AS WELL. WE'RE GOING TO BE ACCEPTING APPLICATIONS UP UNTIL 3 P.M. ON JUNE 25TH. SO IF YOU KNOW ANYBODY WHO'S INTERESTED IN APPLYING TO BE ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION, PLEASE ENCOURAGE THEM TO APPLY. THEY CAN EMAIL THEIR APPLICATIONS DIRECTLY TO OUR CITY CLERK OR MYSELF. AND AGAIN, THEY'RE GOING TO BE AVAILABLE UNTIL 3 P.M. THE DAY OF THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON JUNE 25TH. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO ANY OTHER INFORMATION FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? NO, MA'AM. NO. SO WE'LL ADJOURN THIS MEETING AT 625. THANK YOU. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.